<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is The Army Headed For Collapse?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2007/04/02/is-the-army-headed-for-collapse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/04/02/is-the-army-headed-for-collapse/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:33:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bob in fl</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/04/02/is-the-army-headed-for-collapse/comment-page-1/#comment-300099</link>
		<dc:creator>bob in fl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 04:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/04/02/is-the-army-headed-for-collapse/#comment-300099</guid>
		<description>To begin with, current retention &amp; recruitment rates are not adequate to solve the problems of an Army &amp; Marine Corps already stretched too thin. For starters, it takes about a year to properly train a new soldier. And the lower standards for enlistment means those new recruits will create a less professional fighting force, which will create an even bigger loss of experienced non-coms &amp; junior grade officers.

The Army is badly bent, heading for complete breakdown if conditions do not improve in the next few months.

Speaking of history: Looking back to the past several Presidents &amp; their administrations, it is those with prior experience in the armed forces who make better decisions concerning when to fight &amp; how to do the job if conflict is warranted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To begin with, current retention &amp; recruitment rates are not adequate to solve the problems of an Army &amp; Marine Corps already stretched too thin. For starters, it takes about a year to properly train a new soldier. And the lower standards for enlistment means those new recruits will create a less professional fighting force, which will create an even bigger loss of experienced non-coms &amp; junior grade officers.</p>
<p>The Army is badly bent, heading for complete breakdown if conditions do not improve in the next few months.</p>
<p>Speaking of history: Looking back to the past several Presidents &amp; their administrations, it is those with prior experience in the armed forces who make better decisions concerning when to fight &amp; how to do the job if conflict is warranted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DosPeros</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/04/02/is-the-army-headed-for-collapse/comment-page-1/#comment-295689</link>
		<dc:creator>DosPeros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 03:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/04/02/is-the-army-headed-for-collapse/#comment-295689</guid>
		<description>This is the most interesting quote from the story:

&lt;blockquote&gt;The lesson from this sad story is simple: When you fight a long war with a long-service professional Army, the force you begin with will not get any larger or better over the duration of the conflict.&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

I don&#039;t agree with that statement.  I think better statement be: The lessons from this sad story is simple: When you fight a long war with a long-service professional Army, the cost to maintain the force increases the longer the conflict goes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the most interesting quote from the story:</p>
<blockquote><p>The lesson from this sad story is simple: When you fight a long war with a long-service professional Army, the force you begin with will not get any larger or better over the duration of the conflict.</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t agree with that statement.  I think better statement be: The lessons from this sad story is simple: When you fight a long war with a long-service professional Army, the cost to maintain the force increases the longer the conflict goes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TM Lutas</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/04/02/is-the-army-headed-for-collapse/comment-page-1/#comment-295465</link>
		<dc:creator>TM Lutas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 19:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/04/02/is-the-army-headed-for-collapse/#comment-295465</guid>
		<description>All snark aside, the fix for too few available bodies is an increase in authorized end strength. So who is proposing that? Have the Joint Chiefs forwarded a proposal to Congress for that? Have any of the veterans on the Hill done it on their own? Something doesn&#039;t fit with this story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All snark aside, the fix for too few available bodies is an increase in authorized end strength. So who is proposing that? Have the Joint Chiefs forwarded a proposal to Congress for that? Have any of the veterans on the Hill done it on their own? Something doesn&#8217;t fit with this story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DosPeros</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/04/02/is-the-army-headed-for-collapse/comment-page-1/#comment-295135</link>
		<dc:creator>DosPeros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 14:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/04/02/is-the-army-headed-for-collapse/#comment-295135</guid>
		<description>Well then, what we should obviously do is cut off funding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well then, what we should obviously do is cut off funding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
