The Perversion Of Supply-Side Economics

By Justin Gardner | Related entries in Economy, Money

One of the brains behind the economic theory has harsh words for the current crop of fiscal conservatives.

From the NY Times:

AS one who was present at the creation of “supply-side economics� back in the 1970s, I think it is long past time that the phrase be put to rest. It did its job, creating a new consensus among economists on how to look at the national economy. But today it has become a frequently misleading and meaningless buzzword that gets in the way of good economic policy. [...]

The original supply-siders suggested that some tax cuts, under very special circumstances, might actually raise federal revenues. For example, cutting the capital gains tax rate might induce an unlocking effect that would cause more gains to be realized, thus causing more taxes to be paid on such gains even at a lower rate.

So what happened?

Today, supply-side economics has become associated with an obsession for cutting taxes under any and all circumstances. No longer do its advocates in Congress and elsewhere confine themselves to cutting marginal tax rates � the tax on each additional dollar earned � as the original supply-siders did. Rather, they support even the most gimmicky, economically dubious tax cuts with the same intensity. [...]

This is a simplification of what supply-side economics was all about, and it threatens to undermine the enormous gains that have been made in economic theory and policy over the last 30 years. Perhaps the best way of preventing that from happening is to kill the phrase “supply-side economics� and give it a decent burial.

Read the whole thing.

This entry was posted on Friday, April 6th, 2007 and is filed under Economy, Money. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

8 Responses to “The Perversion Of Supply-Side Economics”

  1. DosPeros Says:

    Your link isn’t working for me — who is the “supply-side” brain?

  2. probligo Says:

    Works for me.

    Bruce Bartlett.

  3. Justin Gardner Says:

    I fixed the link.

    Sorry everybody.

  4. DosPeros Says:

    Supply-side economics is now just “economics” - I point this out because your title to this post could be taken two different ways.

    Moreover, we were adamant that only permanent cuts in marginal tax rates would stimulate the economy. We thought that temporary tax cuts, tax rebates, tax credits and such were economically worthless, and we strongly opposed them.

    Today, hardly any economist believes what the Keynesians believed in the 1970s and most accept the basic ideas of supply-side economics � that incentives matter, that high tax rates are bad for growth, and that inflation is fundamentally a monetary phenomenon. Consequently, there is no longer any meaningful difference between supply-side economics and mainstream economics.

  5. Elyas Says:

    Tax cuts aren’t even about stimulating the economy anymore for many politicians. They’re a gimmick, a talking point used to win elections. Not to mention a way to scratch the backs of those contributing to their campaigns.

    Take a look at how the current economic recovery compares with others since WWII. This one has seen lower growth rates in GDP, employment, equipment investment, and residential investment. I’m sure you can guess the one economic growth area that has outpaced all others (and is significantly higher than in past recoveries): Corporate profits.

  6. ford4x4 Says:

    Yes, let’s kill the phrase “Supply-Side Economics”. While we’re at it,
    let’s kill “Global War on Terror”.

    and the point would be?

  7. Jimmy the Dhimmi Says:

    Not to mention a way to scratch the backs of those contributing to their campaigns.

    As well as the everyday middle class people who don’t like paying taxes.

  8. sleipner Says:

    Yeah, but the everyday middle class people aren’t the ones who get 90% of the dollars from the tax cuts Republicans have been passing.

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: