<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nuclear Power Backed By U.N.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2007/04/30/nuclear-power-backed-by-un/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/04/30/nuclear-power-backed-by-un/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:03:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Aach</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/04/30/nuclear-power-backed-by-un/comment-page-1/#comment-318488</link>
		<dc:creator>James Aach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 22:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/04/30/nuclear-power-backed-by-un/#comment-318488</guid>
		<description>Any energy plan should begin with conservation, since the cheapest, safest energy is that which isn&#039;t used.  

My biggest concern when electric energy policy is discussed is that few understand how electricity is actually made right now.  If we don&#039;t understand our energy present, how can we hope to pick the best energy future?   I happen to work in the U.S. nuclear industry, but I&#039;m not sold on any particular kind of energy for the future.  (Really.  They all have problems.)

To help with the public energy discussion, I&#039;ve written a  novel looking at nuclear power in the U.S. - its people, its politics, its technology.  Rad Decision is available at no cost online at http://RadDecision.blogspot.com - and readers seem to like it judging from their comments on the homepage.   It is also now in paperback at online retailers.  Both proponents and critics will find a lot to muse over in Rad Decision - because the real world of nuclear power is far different than what most imagine it to be (both good and bad).

&quot;I&#039;d like to see Rad Decision widely read.&quot; - Stewart Brand, internet pioneer, founder of &quot;The Whole Earth Catalog&quot; and noted futurist. 
 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://raddecision.blogspot.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;RadDecision.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any energy plan should begin with conservation, since the cheapest, safest energy is that which isn&#8217;t used.  </p>
<p>My biggest concern when electric energy policy is discussed is that few understand how electricity is actually made right now.  If we don&#8217;t understand our energy present, how can we hope to pick the best energy future?   I happen to work in the U.S. nuclear industry, but I&#8217;m not sold on any particular kind of energy for the future.  (Really.  They all have problems.)</p>
<p>To help with the public energy discussion, I&#8217;ve written a  novel looking at nuclear power in the U.S. &#8211; its people, its politics, its technology.  Rad Decision is available at no cost online at <a href="http://RadDecision.blogspot.com" >http://RadDecision.blogspot.com</a> &#8211; and readers seem to like it judging from their comments on the homepage.   It is also now in paperback at online retailers.  Both proponents and critics will find a lot to muse over in Rad Decision &#8211; because the real world of nuclear power is far different than what most imagine it to be (both good and bad).</p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;d like to see Rad Decision widely read.&#8221; &#8211; Stewart Brand, internet pioneer, founder of &#8220;The Whole Earth Catalog&#8221; and noted futurist. </p>
<p><a href="http://raddecision.blogspot.com" >RadDecision.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

