Were I a more pragmatic man, politically, I would shrug and continue to actively support his campaign, but I’m a principled, centerist Libertarian – just as he’s a Lib somewhat right of center and clearly less anti-authoritarian than I.

But when a man who is running on the basis of being a strict constittutionalist can nonetheless say damn-fool things such as I record in the link above, I have to wonder if he’s the same sort of Constitutionalist as Alito.

Nonetheless, as president, he’s not nearly as dangerous, constitutionally speaking, as a powerful and motivated congress, and I think a constitutionalist veto would be a very, very good thing.

But then, Kuchinich is a constitutionalist as well.

Shame on that post. Ron Paul is a ethnic Jew as well. VERY well has he hidden it under the cloak of protestantism.

the Gold Standard is VERY Jewish as well. Remember Greenspans words why he likes gold. Fractional Reserve banking had its start under the goy and the Jew had NO CHOICE but to follow including the Rothschild who intially was against it.

Yes, online polls suffer from self-selection error. Off-line polls suffer from other deficits. Like it or not, Dr. Paul has gotten his message out. And the same old tired corrupt politicians who mouth platitudes are going to look like fools from now on.

Not of all Ron Paul’s ideas could be implemented at the drop of a hat but he certainly has the right ideas.

Why not just change “Texas” to “China” or “Africa” and see if you can get away with your inherently racist remark.

What separates Ron Paul is the fact he is willing to address scams like the IRS, Federal Reserve, etc… No one else would dare bring these issues up for fear of their own political career and/or agenda. All Ron Paul cares about is the Constitution.

While I think right now is the worst time in history to be a Republican, we have to remember two things. One, the “republicans” in office are FAR from text-book Republicans. No true Republican party would’ve spent as much money as this current administration has spent, nor would they try to create such a world police. They are a farce with their own agendas in mind. Two, you have to look past “democrat” vs. “republican”, and think “what candidate would be best right now for America”. If you think Democrats don’t have their own agenda, think again. Just looking at Hilary gives me the chills.

That all being said, Ive been making sure to get the word out about Ron Paul as much as possible. People tend to listen when you ask them how they would feel if the IRS was no more. :)

First of all, we can never trust on-line polls. But this goes to the point I was trying to make in my earlier comment. Ron Paul supporters are clearly coordinating on line and gaming the boards and polls. Nevertheless, it requires a committed and passionate following to pull that off as effectively as they have. It begs the question – Why is the same level of commitment and passion not in evidence from the supporters of other Republican candidates?

The enthusiasm for a second tier candidate like Paul can only be this visible when placed against as backdrop of limited to no enthusiasm for the other candidates.