Bush And Dems Reach Bipartisan Trade Deal

By Justin Gardner | Related entries in Foreign Policy, General Politics, The World

Well done.

From NY Times:

The unusual agreement, which came after weeks of negotiations, would guarantee workers the right to organize, ban child labor and prohibit forced labor in trading-partner countries. It would also require trading partners to enforce environmental laws already on their books and comply with several international environmental agreements.

While the understanding was a victory for Democrats, it also represented a shrewd compromise by the White House. The agreement is the first major bipartisan economic deal to emerge since Democrats took control of Congress in January. It has immediate importance for four countries � Colombia, Panama, Peru and South Korea � that are seeking to enter into trade pacts with the United States.

But officials in Washington predicted that the agreement’s effect would go beyond those countries and could be a template for all trade deals, including a possible worldwide accord.

Is there anything else to say besides that?


This entry was posted on Friday, May 11th, 2007 and is filed under Foreign Policy, General Politics, The World. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

One Response to “Bush And Dems Reach Bipartisan Trade Deal”

  1. wj Says:

    I keep wondering if those who argue the most strongly on this topic are familiar with one concept: subsistance agriculture. Any idea the hours, working conditions, number of children involved? Thought not — not a clue in the world.

    Certainly all of these labor practices would be good to ban. And I personally think nobody ought to have to deal with them. But if the alternative is living and working in a subsistance agriculture situation, they can look like a step forward. And sometimes, however regretable it is, they show every sign of being the only available step forward. Anybody who urges a blanket ban ought to have some hard evidence for how his alternative will successfully get people out of subsistance agriculture in the real world.

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: