<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bush And Dems Reach Bipartisan Trade Deal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2007/05/11/bush-and-dems-reach-bipartisan-trade-deal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/05/11/bush-and-dems-reach-bipartisan-trade-deal/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: wj</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/05/11/bush-and-dems-reach-bipartisan-trade-deal/#comment-325363</link>
		<dc:creator>wj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 23:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=3505#comment-325363</guid>
		<description>I keep wondering if those who argue the most strongly on this topic are familiar with one concept: subsistance agriculture.  Any idea the hours, working conditions, number of children involved?  Thought not -- not a clue in the world. 

Certainly all of these labor practices would be good to ban.  And I personally think nobody ought to have to deal with them.  But if the alternative is living and working in a subsistance agriculture situation, they can look like a step forward.  And sometimes, however regretable it is, they show every sign of being the only available step forward.  Anybody who urges a blanket ban ought to have some hard evidence for how his alternative will successfully get people out of subsistance agriculture in the real world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I keep wondering if those who argue the most strongly on this topic are familiar with one concept: subsistance agriculture.  Any idea the hours, working conditions, number of children involved?  Thought not &#8212; not a clue in the world. </p>
<p>Certainly all of these labor practices would be good to ban.  And I personally think nobody ought to have to deal with them.  But if the alternative is living and working in a subsistance agriculture situation, they can look like a step forward.  And sometimes, however regretable it is, they show every sign of being the only available step forward.  Anybody who urges a blanket ban ought to have some hard evidence for how his alternative will successfully get people out of subsistance agriculture in the real world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.473 seconds -->
