No, I don’t sell them and I just bought some. But I’ve been looking for this and am sure lots of other people are also. Put them up near freeway entrances and lets show our neighbors that ‘We aren’t just the Internet!”

>How can a guy who has not supported a single free-trade bill can
>be called a defender of freedom? WHat about my freedom to
>commerce with anyone i want?

It is precisely because those bills did not represent free trade. They represented *managed* trade. A free trade bill should only need to be a few lines – maybe a paragraph – in length. These so-called “free trade” bills ran into hundreds of pages, and defer sovereignty to a international governing board.

> How can a guy who wants to go back to the gold standard be trustable?

Because gold can’t be promised into creation. It has to actually exist. From that standpoint, gold is inherently trustworthy. It is only those who come to you with greenbacks and dollars that can default on their promises.

> How can a guy that adheres to the loony Rothbard’s thesis on
> war and peace make me feel safe?

He can’t. Rothbard isn’t about safety; Rothbard is about freedom. Once you have freedom, you can guarantee your own safety. If you are waiting for some politician to make you feel safe, then you will have a long wait, and it will only be an illusion in the end.

Laters

http://emp.byui.edu/DavisR/202/Libertarians.htm

And if anyone really thinks that Ron Paul is a conservative, just take a look at his ratings. All of them: taxpayers, government contractors, conservatives and liberals interest groups. Then, take your own conclusions.

I just gave that “weirdo” Ron Paul $2,300.

I’m 34 and have never donated money to a political campaign. I didn’t even bother voting in 2004.

$2,300 is a lot of money for me.

I think people are going to be shocked at how much money Paul raises from people like me.

You can join this meetup at: http://ronpaul.meetup.com/43

You can participate in our forums at: http://www.ronpaulkc.com

After the California debate, all major networks had polls straming on the newsbar immediately following the debate. You can go to youtube or goog video and find a clip of Hannity lauding Ghouliani, while the poll results are going across the bottom of the screen showing that Paul winning. Funny stuff.

Following the most recent debate, I flipped between CNN, HNN, FOX and MSNBC for about an hour following that debate….what was NOT streaming across the newsbar on ANY of these channels…and why?

its obvious to me!

Go Ron Go

Here is an interactive audio archive of
Ron Paul speeches and interviews as a resource in chronological
order.

http://www.ronpaulaudio.com

The power of mainstream media is well documented right here in this 2003 film.
http://www.ronpaulaudio.com/rpaudio/TheRevolutionWillNotBeTelevised2003.wvx

The rest of the party only looks at him in a weird way because he goes by this document called a “Constitution” that they’ve never heard of nor thought of outside their oaths of office, in which they swear to uphold it. The rest of the time, they like to rip it up and stomp on it when they don’t just completely ignore it.

I think inside you realize that it is the dumbest thing in the world to go on a pro-Paul discussion board and act like Paul supporters are just a few crazy tin-foil hatters, RIGHT AFTER READING THAT RON PAUL’s campaign has raised upwards of THREE or FOUR MILLION!

I think you know that, and you’re just trying to make anti-Paul people look stupid.

I’d put money on the fact that Jimmy the D is 100% pro-Paul and is just involved in the Pro-Paul conspiracy to paint the rest of the country as idiots.

I spotted you Jimmy! I can beat you up probably!

The 9-11 truth smear on Paul is proof the media are scared. He just points out the unspeakable truth: our atrocious, interventionist murder in other nations makes us hated.

RON PAUL FOR THE WIN 2008!

I sited numerous polls that Dr. Paul had outright won after numerous debates. Now here’s the real milk of politics. Apparently Dr. Paul has one of the fastest growing campaigns according to funds raised. Check this out. It appears that, perhaps Dr. Paul has raised over 4 perhaps 5 million dollars since the debates. If this proves true, it moves Dr. Ron Paul into the top tier.

Dr. Ron Paul could surpass McCain in cash on hand by the next debate and Dr. Paul could raise over 10 million in a few more months. As a former fund raiser, it takes “cash� to play this game.

Apparently Republicans want their Party back. This could be a start of a new Republican Revolution.

1) Internet-oriented people are more libertarian, so RP polls higher online. I couldn’t take part in one of these “scientific polls” if I wanted to – I don’t have a land line, and if I did, I wouldn’t answer a CallerID as “Unknown” or “Rasmussen Inc” or whatever shows up. Admittedly, lots of those phone-answering old farts vote in both primaries and general elections – somebody’s gotta tell Washington to keep the SS payments coming.

2) As “Seer” mentioned, even if 4/5 of Republicans love the war, that 4/5 split 4 ways (Rudy, McCain, Romney, Other) is 1/5. Ron gets the 1/5 of antiwar all to himself, putting him on par with front runners.

3) Internet polls include Democrats and the disaffected – people who would not be useful in the primaries (unless they get inspired to register Republican), but could be very valuable in the general election (I don’t see a democrat voting for Giuliani ever), so that bumps up RP’s online numbers.

So it doesn’t require a vast unix nerd conspiracy to account for this, just a couple common sense demographic observations. It’s not an overturning of the status quo; however, it is a small but real phenonmenon.

I also wonder (no I’m not a “truther”) how these people all poo-poo the notion that there would be a conspiracy surrounding an event unique in American history that has drastically altered our foreign and domestic policy, yet a couple on-line poll blips and they scream “conspiracy! conspiracy!”

Lighten up, neocons – freedom doesn’t suck as much as you think.