<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Safire on pardons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2007/07/03/safire-on-pardons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/07/03/safire-on-pardons/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:03:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim S</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/07/03/safire-on-pardons/comment-page-1/#comment-367884</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 01:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/07/03/safire-on-pardons/#comment-367884</guid>
		<description>Sean,

    Please tell me you don&#039;t expect rationality from someone who&#039;d make that post. Notice that they don&#039;t address the fact that no one who Clinton pardoned worked for them and had potentially incriminating evidence they could testify to. Though I do think that Libby was loyal enough so that he wouldn&#039;t betray his boss no matter what he did. And I do mean that he places no limits on what he would protect both Cheney and Bush from.

   As far as Taranto&#039;s article goes, I couldn&#039;t care less. The WSJ OpEd pages are pure junk. Completely worthless paper that makes Fox News actually seem fair and balanced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean,</p>
<p>    Please tell me you don&#8217;t expect rationality from someone who&#8217;d make that post. Notice that they don&#8217;t address the fact that no one who Clinton pardoned worked for them and had potentially incriminating evidence they could testify to. Though I do think that Libby was loyal enough so that he wouldn&#8217;t betray his boss no matter what he did. And I do mean that he places no limits on what he would protect both Cheney and Bush from.</p>
<p>   As far as Taranto&#8217;s article goes, I couldn&#8217;t care less. The WSJ OpEd pages are pure junk. Completely worthless paper that makes Fox News actually seem fair and balanced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Aqui</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/07/03/safire-on-pardons/comment-page-1/#comment-367245</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Aqui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 15:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/07/03/safire-on-pardons/#comment-367245</guid>
		<description>Wonder of wonders! I can post comments again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonder of wonders! I can post comments again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Aqui</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/07/03/safire-on-pardons/comment-page-1/#comment-367223</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Aqui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 14:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/07/03/safire-on-pardons/#comment-367223</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;ClintonÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s pardon of the FALN terrorists was politcally motivated and helped pave ClintonÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s image as a terrorist-lover.&lt;/i&gt;

If you can explain why Clinton would want to be known as a terrorist lover, be my guest.

&lt;i&gt;In addition, so was his pardon of that Jewish leader from upstate NY in exchange for vote for Hillary in 2000.&lt;/i&gt;

Got a name?

&lt;i&gt;Will you defend that? IÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢m not holding my breath. &lt;/i&gt;

This is incoherent. It would make sense if you wrote &quot;Will you condemn that?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>ClintonÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s pardon of the FALN terrorists was politcally motivated and helped pave ClintonÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s image as a terrorist-lover.</i></p>
<p>If you can explain why Clinton would want to be known as a terrorist lover, be my guest.</p>
<p><i>In addition, so was his pardon of that Jewish leader from upstate NY in exchange for vote for Hillary in 2000.</i></p>
<p>Got a name?</p>
<p><i>Will you defend that? IÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢m not holding my breath. </i></p>
<p>This is incoherent. It would make sense if you wrote &#8220;Will you condemn that?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/07/03/safire-on-pardons/comment-page-1/#comment-366123</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 02:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/07/03/safire-on-pardons/#comment-366123</guid>
		<description>Clinton&#039;s pardon of the FALN terrorists was politcally motivated and helped pave Clinton&#039;s image as a terrorist-lover.

In addition, so was his pardon of that Jewish leader from upstate NY in exchange for vote for Hillary in 2000.

Will you defend that?

I&#039;m not holding my breath.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clinton&#8217;s pardon of the FALN terrorists was politcally motivated and helped pave Clinton&#8217;s image as a terrorist-lover.</p>
<p>In addition, so was his pardon of that Jewish leader from upstate NY in exchange for vote for Hillary in 2000.</p>
<p>Will you defend that?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not holding my breath.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Olson</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/07/03/safire-on-pardons/comment-page-1/#comment-366115</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Olson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 02:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/07/03/safire-on-pardons/#comment-366115</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s all politics as usual. That is it goes the other way. See Mr Taranto&#039;s comments regarding a Clinton pardon of FALN in today&#039;s opinion journal and the reaction of the Democrats in Congress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s all politics as usual. That is it goes the other way. See Mr Taranto&#8217;s comments regarding a Clinton pardon of FALN in today&#8217;s opinion journal and the reaction of the Democrats in Congress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

