<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Curing libertarian political impotence &#8211; a prescription for Electile Dysfunction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2007/07/16/curing-libertarian-political-impotence-a-prescription-for-electile-dysfunction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/07/16/curing-libertarian-political-impotence-a-prescription-for-electile-dysfunction/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:53:41 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DosPeros</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/07/16/curing-libertarian-political-impotence-a-prescription-for-electile-dysfunction/comment-page-1/#comment-373480</link>
		<dc:creator>DosPeros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 19:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=3765#comment-373480</guid>
		<description>mw - I&#039;ll give you Huxley and, with prior written consent, James Ballard and Malcom Muggeridge on Tuesdays and Thursdays.  

I too am libertarian leaning, particular on economic matters, in which I credit libertarianism with general adherence to the Austrian school and a general repulsion with Keynes.  On social issues, I am pretty much of a traditionalist and a federalist.  This is were I run into some disagreement with libertarianism.

&quot;Government&#039;s view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.&quot; - Ronald Reagan -- we can share the Gipper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mw &#8211; I&#8217;ll give you Huxley and, with prior written consent, James Ballard and Malcom Muggeridge on Tuesdays and Thursdays.  </p>
<p>I too am libertarian leaning, particular on economic matters, in which I credit libertarianism with general adherence to the Austrian school and a general repulsion with Keynes.  On social issues, I am pretty much of a traditionalist and a federalist.  This is were I run into some disagreement with libertarianism.</p>
<p>&#8220;Government&#8217;s view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.&#8221; &#8211; Ronald Reagan &#8212; we can share the Gipper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mw</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/07/16/curing-libertarian-political-impotence-a-prescription-for-electile-dysfunction/comment-page-1/#comment-373435</link>
		<dc:creator>mw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 17:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=3765#comment-373435</guid>
		<description>TwoPears ( or is it &lt;i&gt;tTwoButs&lt;/i&gt;?),
Sorry to step on your area of responsibility. I&#039;ll limit my Orwell references in the future. I am still not understanding your perspective here. You agreed with Jim S statement, but seem to be saying libertarianism and communism are polar opposites, which is of course true. 

I guess the confusion is in this use of a &quot;mirror&quot; as a metaphor. Is the reflection the same or the opposite? Jim S is clearly dismissing libertarians by saying the are the same as communists, which is nonsense. You are saying they are the opposite (inverted), yet &quot;you agree&#039;... perhaps we should also agree to no more mirror metaphors.

FWIW, I am neither a Libertarian nor an Objectivist. My political views &lt;i&gt;are&lt;/i&gt; &quot;libertarian leaning&quot;, which means I have to do some &lt;a href=&quot;http://donklephant.com/2007/06/23/i-change-my-underwear-political-party-affiliation/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;party hopping&lt;/a&gt; on an issue by issue basis to get any electoral satisfaction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TwoPears ( or is it <i>tTwoButs</i>?),<br />
Sorry to step on your area of responsibility. I&#8217;ll limit my Orwell references in the future. I am still not understanding your perspective here. You agreed with Jim S statement, but seem to be saying libertarianism and communism are polar opposites, which is of course true. </p>
<p>I guess the confusion is in this use of a &#8220;mirror&#8221; as a metaphor. Is the reflection the same or the opposite? Jim S is clearly dismissing libertarians by saying the are the same as communists, which is nonsense. You are saying they are the opposite (inverted), yet &#8220;you agree&#8217;&#8230; perhaps we should also agree to no more mirror metaphors.</p>
<p>FWIW, I am neither a Libertarian nor an Objectivist. My political views <i>are</i> &#8220;libertarian leaning&#8221;, which means I have to do some <a href="http://donklephant.com/2007/06/23/i-change-my-underwear-political-party-affiliation/" rel="nofollow">party hopping</a> on an issue by issue basis to get any electoral satisfaction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DosPeros</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/07/16/curing-libertarian-political-impotence-a-prescription-for-electile-dysfunction/comment-page-1/#comment-373029</link>
		<dc:creator>DosPeros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 14:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=3765#comment-373029</guid>
		<description>mw - it is my job and my job alone to reference Orwell around here.  My quote was that Ayn Rand was a &quot;inverted marxists&quot; which is to say that pure Objectivism (the philosophical creature of Rand. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Objectivism_(Ayn_Rand)) is inverted marxism - to the extent that it rejects any external source of morality or transcendence or God and relies entirely on a schema of self-interested rationalism.  Marxism, of course, does the same, but instead of relying on self-interested rationalism, goes after modes of production and class. So it is not a perfect argument, but it is there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mw &#8211; it is my job and my job alone to reference Orwell around here.  My quote was that Ayn Rand was a &#8220;inverted marxists&#8221; which is to say that pure Objectivism (the philosophical creature of Rand. See <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Objectivism_(Ayn_Rand))" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Objectivism_(Ayn_Rand))</a> is inverted marxism &#8211; to the extent that it rejects any external source of morality or transcendence or God and relies entirely on a schema of self-interested rationalism.  Marxism, of course, does the same, but instead of relying on self-interested rationalism, goes after modes of production and class. So it is not a perfect argument, but it is there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mw</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/07/16/curing-libertarian-political-impotence-a-prescription-for-electile-dysfunction/comment-page-1/#comment-372929</link>
		<dc:creator>mw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 04:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=3765#comment-372929</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã…â€œLibertarianism is just communism in the mirror.ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚? &lt;/i&gt;

I guess I have to agree . This is absolutely true, in the same sense that:

&quot;Left is just Right in the mirror&quot;
&quot;Freedom is just Slavery in the mirror&quot;
&quot;War is just Peace in the mirror&quot;
&quot;Ignorance is just Strength in the mirror&quot;

The &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nineteen_Eighty-Four&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Ministry of Truth&lt;/a&gt; has a job for you guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã…â€œLibertarianism is just communism in the mirror.ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚? </i></p>
<p>I guess I have to agree . This is absolutely true, in the same sense that:</p>
<p>&#8220;Left is just Right in the mirror&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Freedom is just Slavery in the mirror&#8221;<br />
&#8220;War is just Peace in the mirror&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Ignorance is just Strength in the mirror&#8221;</p>
<p>The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nineteen_Eighty-Four" rel="nofollow"> Ministry of Truth</a> has a job for you guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DosPeros</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/07/16/curing-libertarian-political-impotence-a-prescription-for-electile-dysfunction/comment-page-1/#comment-372384</link>
		<dc:creator>DosPeros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 04:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=3765#comment-372384</guid>
		<description>&quot;Libertarianism is just communism in the mirror.&quot; I agree and so did Russell Kirk.  He considered Ayn Rand an &quot;inverted marxist.&quot;  My father was involved heavily in the conservative movement in the 1950&#039;s-60&#039;s in academia. 

Brian Doherty gives a fascinating and impassioned talk about the libertarianism/conservative divergence.  
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hiFDYqFzGVA

&quot;We will never end wars until we understand why the garage service should be removed from the police force. That is government.&quot; Words of infinite wisdom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Libertarianism is just communism in the mirror.&#8221; I agree and so did Russell Kirk.  He considered Ayn Rand an &#8220;inverted marxist.&#8221;  My father was involved heavily in the conservative movement in the 1950&#8217;s-60&#8217;s in academia. </p>
<p>Brian Doherty gives a fascinating and impassioned talk about the libertarianism/conservative divergence.<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hiFDYqFzGVA" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hiFDYqFzGVA</a></p>
<p>&#8220;We will never end wars until we understand why the garage service should be removed from the police force. That is government.&#8221; Words of infinite wisdom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim S</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/07/16/curing-libertarian-political-impotence-a-prescription-for-electile-dysfunction/comment-page-1/#comment-371675</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=3765#comment-371675</guid>
		<description>There cannot be a real place in the political center for a radical movement that&#039;s completely out of touch with modern reality. Libertarianism is just communism in the mirror.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There cannot be a real place in the political center for a radical movement that&#8217;s completely out of touch with modern reality. Libertarianism is just communism in the mirror.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
