Last thoughts on Dem debate.

By mw | Related entries in Blogging, Elections, In The News, Partisan Hacks

Hey, better late than never. I was live blogging the live bloggers during the debate on DWSUWF Monday night, but decided to spare Donklephant readers the real-time experience. You can thank me later. After a couple of days reflection and surveying the blogosphere, I distilled my conclusions into a more digestible form. Concluding thoughts:

Justin asked about our favorite YouTube debate question. Instead, I’ll offer the one that pissed me off:



Overall, I thought CNN and Anderson Cooper did a great job. But CNN selected this guy to represent the legitimate 2nd Amendment concerns of many Americans. Tell me there wasn’t a better choice to ask this question. Tell me why CNN selected this whackjob. I am a gun owner and an outdoorsman, and my concerns were not represented by him. This legitimate question was given short shrift as result of CNN’s selection. This is the weakness of the format. YouTube submitters will ask questions in a manner that would not be considered acceptable by a professional journalist. That makes it more interesting. But bias can be inserted by the selection of more extreme and off the wall YouTube videos, to a degree that is not possible with professional questioners. A great deal of attention should be focused on how videos are selected, and who does the the selection.

excerpted from Divided We Stand United We Fall


This entry was posted on Thursday, July 26th, 2007 and is filed under Blogging, Elections, In The News, Partisan Hacks. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

3 Responses to “Last thoughts on Dem debate.”

  1. Becky Says:

    Hey, thanks for mentioning he second amendment question, which CNN, by choosing a total nutcase to present the issue, made a blatant editorial comment. It is certainly, as you point out, a legitimate issue, and one that is very likely headed to the Supreme Court for some definitive resolution.

    On the postscript to my blog post today, I posted a question that had been submitted on this issue by Rachael Mills, who is kind of the YouTube “Ron Paul Girl” It would have been nice if they had used that one.

    ~Becky

  2. Left Flank Says:

    The YouTube/CNN ???

    Donklephant agrees with me about this wasted video question on the Second Amendment.
    But more importantly, his criticisms point to one big issue, that others have pointed out unsuccessfully:
    This is the weakness of the format. YouTube submitters will …

  3. mw Says:

    Becky, LF,
    I’m surprised this has not gotten more attention in either the MSM or the blogosphere. I think it is because the most vocal defenders of 2nd Amendment issues feels obligated to defend gun collectors like our Michigan Militia friend, and so instead criticize Biden for calling him a nut. As a result ,the real issue of “Why was this video selected?” is obscured. We’ll hear about it again when a more focused constituency finds their ox gored in a similar way.

    Here is an idea. How about this for a YouTube question in the Republican debate:

    You’ll need to find a hard-core Earth-First type. Film him walking down the street, slashing tires on SUV’s and pouring sugar in their gas tanks, cut to the same guy spiking trees in a forest, all the while recording his voice-over – “I am doing what I can to stop global warming. A question for all the candidates. Are you committed to doing whatever it takes to save the planet?”

    Resonable question. Unresonable questioner.

    BTW LF – I am one of a number of bloggers posting and x-posting, at Donklephant. Sooo its not quite accurate to say that “Donklephant agrees” – in fact I suspect I might be in a minority here.

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: