<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does A 3rd Party Ticket Really Have A Shot?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2007/08/06/does-a-3rd-party-ticket-really-have-a-shot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/08/06/does-a-3rd-party-ticket-really-have-a-shot/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:24:43 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sleipner</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/08/06/does-a-3rd-party-ticket-really-have-a-shot/comment-page-1/#comment-380190</link>
		<dc:creator>sleipner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 00:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/08/06/does-a-3rd-party-ticket-really-have-a-shot/#comment-380190</guid>
		<description>The biggest problem with a third party candidate is that the electoral system is not designed to have more than two candidates.  If Bloomberg, for example, takes a few big states he could easily screw up either of the other two candidates, depending on whether that state usually leans slightly left or right.

Since he&#039;s Republican, theoretically he&#039;s more likely to take red states, but since he&#039;s somewhat socially liberal, he may appeal better to republicans in more moderate states.  Basically if he&#039;s in the running, it&#039;s REALLY tough to figure out how it would swing the race, or if he would even possible win.  Especially since he would likely spend a few billion of his own money on the race.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest problem with a third party candidate is that the electoral system is not designed to have more than two candidates.  If Bloomberg, for example, takes a few big states he could easily screw up either of the other two candidates, depending on whether that state usually leans slightly left or right.</p>
<p>Since he&#8217;s Republican, theoretically he&#8217;s more likely to take red states, but since he&#8217;s somewhat socially liberal, he may appeal better to republicans in more moderate states.  Basically if he&#8217;s in the running, it&#8217;s REALLY tough to figure out how it would swing the race, or if he would even possible win.  Especially since he would likely spend a few billion of his own money on the race.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Herman</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/08/06/does-a-3rd-party-ticket-really-have-a-shot/comment-page-1/#comment-380174</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Herman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 20:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/08/06/does-a-3rd-party-ticket-really-have-a-shot/#comment-380174</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s inaccurate to say that Clinton&#039;s floor is 40%. I&#039;d say closer to 35%. The Republicans&#039; floor is as low as 25% at this point. So from a pure numbers standpoint, at least by my figuring, Bloomberg could win if he won just about every available voter that wasn&#039;t already committed to one of the major party candidates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s inaccurate to say that Clinton&#8217;s floor is 40%. I&#8217;d say closer to 35%. The Republicans&#8217; floor is as low as 25% at this point. So from a pure numbers standpoint, at least by my figuring, Bloomberg could win if he won just about every available voter that wasn&#8217;t already committed to one of the major party candidates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
