iWK5Qt2 | adult cam chat live sex …

http://www.jpfo.org/hope.htm

A couple of quotes:

“From his office in the White House, President Hope labors to bring a swollen, murderous, runaway government under control by binding it “with the chains of the Constitution” — an objective that would end at least 90% of all government activities — while the enemies of liberty at both ends of the political spectrum (and within his own party, as well) attempt to obstruct, discredit, impeach, and even kill him.”

“See how one man drags a whole country, kicking and screaming, into the 21st century and makes it the century of the Bill of Rights. See how one man brings the grand ideas and ideals of the Founding Fathers back to life.”

So the one big difference I’d expect to see in a Ron Paul presidency would be a honest administration…that alone would be mind blowingly refreshing. All the rest of the guys are full of shit…if you can’t see that then you are full of shit. Apologies to Kuccinich and Gravel, they seem honest but not quite as smart as Ron Paul.

FIRST (4)
New Hampshire Taxpayers, July 7 ~ 1st 61.9% (182/294)
North Carolina, Gaston GOP, August 13, ~ 1st 36.6% (15/41)
New Hampshire, Stafford, NH, August 18~ 1st 72.7% (208/286)
West Alabama, August 18 ~ 1st 81.2% (216/266)

SECOND (4)
Utah GOP, June 12, 2nd 5.4% (70/1295)
LibertyPapers.org conference, June 16 ~ 2nd 16.7% (NA)
Georgia, Cobb Co. GOP, July 4 ~ 2nd 17% (42/247)
South Carolina, Georgetown Co., July 28 ~ 2nd 18% (40/223)

THIRD (2)
National Federation of Republican Assemblies, August 4, St. Louis, MO ~ 3rd 14% (NA)
Illinois, Springfield, August 16 ~ tied 3rd 18.87% (174/922)

FOURTH (1)
California Republican Assembly, July 1 ~ 4th 12% (NA)

FIFTH (1)
Iowa, Ames, August 11 ~ 5th 9.12% (1,305/14,302)

SIXTH (1)
Young Republican National Federation, Ft Lauderdale FL, July 8th ~ 6th 4.5% (11/247)

Sourced in part from:
http://www.freemarketnews.com/WorldNews.asp?nid=47579

Other data on 14 polls: http://isilion.blogsome.com/2007/08/19/85/

Dan, you are wrong, plain and simple. (So, screw you, too.) Paul is personally pro-life but he does not support a federal ban on abortion either. His voting record reflects his refusal to give funding to abortion (or to make those who disagree with abortion pay for it through their taxes). The federal govt should not decide, but each individual state should:

http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul301.html

“Roe v. Wade was wrongly decided, but not because the Supreme Court presumed to legalize abortion rather than ban it. Roe was wrongly decided because abortion simply is not a constitutional issue.”

Paul does not believe in fighting the culture wars with laws:

“Those who seek a pro-life culture must accept that we will never persuade all 300 million Americans to agree with us. A pro-life culture can be built only from the ground up, person by person. For too long we have viewed the battle as purely political, but no political victory can change a degraded society. No Supreme Court ruling by itself can instill greater respect for life. And no Supreme Court justice can save our freedoms if we don’t fight for them ourselves.”

Lastly, you know what, people? Abortion is not REALLY that big of a thing. Compared to our terroristic foreign policy and irresponsible economic policy, which inflicts so much suffering on the living…abortion is going to be the issue you vote on? are you fucking kidding me?

but ron paul’s voting record seems to always favor anti-abortion. always. which is REALLY not very anti-big-government.

so screw him. that’s kind of a big thing.

I have lots more but i ask that you visit this site and see what they have to say.
http://christianschoiceronpaul.com

1) an unprecedent number of interstate compacts,
2) an increase in charitable giving and non-for-profit organizations;
3) an appreciation of the USD;
4) repeal of the 16th Amendment;
5) a general decentralization of power.

-It would be an administration that spent all its time working to repeal laws instead of passing new ones.

-The oval office would be far less important and wield far less power when President Paul retired from service

You seem to be laboring under the false assumption that party registration for the purpose of primary election is unchangable.

Here’s a chance to do some real reporting. Go to the voter reg place and ask some questions about who is registering for what party. A whole lot of anti-war people are registering Republican.

A whole lot of pro-war republicans are mad as hell at the GOP’s domestic spending (more money spent than drunken Democrat saliors could) and seeing as the war isn’t going so hot anyway, they might just vote for someone who really intends to wield the veto pen.

Later.

He’s a firm believer in the constitution but also a savvy politico and understands reality. He doesn’t get a lot of credit for this but it’s worth pointing out when people suggest his policy’s are unworkable.

i would go to tobey mcguire concerts and drink coors lite and not feel like an ass