Get Rid Of Electoral College?

By Justin Gardner | Related entries in 2008 Election

Apparently a majority of Americans are in favor of it, but is it likely that we can switch without some serious movement in the halls of power?

From FairVote:

Many adults in the United States are questioning the way their head of state us elected, according to a poll by Rasmussen Reports. 54 per cent of respondents think the U.S. should get rid of the Electoral College so that the winner of the popular vote becomes president. [...]

On Aug. 25, Democratic California senator Dianne Feinstein called for the abolition of the Electoral College, saying, “The current system enables a handful of states to become battleground states, and disenfranchises tens of millions of American voters in the most important election in the nation. By amending the Constitution to abolish the Electoral College, and replacing it with a system in which the winner is the candidate with the most votes nationwide, we will ensure that the method of electing the president and vice-president is fair and uniform.” [...]

Should the United States get rid of the Electoral College so that the winner of the popular vote becomes president?

Yes 54%
No 30%

I like “fair and uniform”…how about you?

This entry was posted on Monday, September 3rd, 2007 and is filed under 2008 Election. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

9 Responses to “Get Rid Of Electoral College?”

  1. Jeremy Says:

    There’s something I learned a long time ago, just because a majority of Americans support change doesn’t mean our government is going to enact it.

    Anything that would hurt the co-ruling parties hold on power is sure to meet indifference and/or resistance. Abolishing the Electoral College would open up the playing field for viable third-party candidates, and the co-rulers don’t want to see anything of the kind. They are used to power, it doesn’t matter that the two parties sold out America long ago, they intend to stay hell or high water.

  2. Robert D. Says:

    Of course, abolishing the Electoral College just turns the problem the other way. If we abolish it, candidates will completely ignore low-population states and campaign almost solely in New York, Pennsylvania, California, Texas, Illinois and Florida.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by_population

  3. Jim S Says:

    I’ve thought that the Electoral College should be eliminated ever since my first social sciences class that taught about it.

  4. sleipner Says:

    I’ve been in favor of its removal for a few decades as well. In addition, I personally think the primary system needs to be completely revamped.

    We should have some sort of system whereby anyone who gets enough popular support ends up on the final ballot, and then instead of a single-vote method (very primitive by scientific standards), each voter rank all candidates in order of preference (or at least the top 3). From this list, you then do sequential eliminations of those receiving the least votes, until you get to the candidate that maybe isn’t everyone’s favorite, but at least they can stand.

    The users on this site should love that idea (at least the truly moderate ones), as it would tend to eliminate both the far left and far right candidates right off the bat, as well as the ones that are repulsive to a large number of voters (Bush, Hillary, Romney).

  5. Paul Says:

    Surely it should be done away with. While a constitutional amendment would be best, the next best thing is available: the National Popular Vote interstate compact, already signed in Maryland. Check it out at nationalpopularvote.com

  6. dj Says:

    Here’s more about Instant Runoff Voting, the system sleipner describes:

    http://instantrunoff.com/
    http://www.fairvote.org/irv/

  7. Electoral College Class of ‘96 : Hear ItFrom.Us Says:

    [...] Gardner at Donklephant asks if we should Get Rid of the Electoral College. On Aug. 25, Democratic California senator Dianne Feinstein called for the abolition of the [...]

  8. Brian O. Says:

    Perhaps we should also abolish the US Senate since it is even less proportional than the electoral college. In fact by definition, congress is proportioned exactly the same way as the electoral college. Let’s abolish the Senate, and make all House elections national popular elections. Then we could have a government which best serves the will of the American people right?

    Or we could consider for a moment that this country is a federation of individual states which have rights over and above the sum total of the rights of the citizens residing in each state….

  9. Blog It Out Your Pie Hole » Blog Archive » Iowa, Electoral College, and Pie Holes Says:

    [...] the people. The House and Senate are Checks against the Electoral College. Even in spite of the people espousing their belief that the Electoral College is not needed, there are some who read between the lines of [...]

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: