<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Did Redstate.com Ban Ron Paul Talk?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2007/10/23/why-did-redstatecom-ban-ron-paul-talk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/10/23/why-did-redstatecom-ban-ron-paul-talk/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:08:28 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: RickB</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/10/23/why-did-redstatecom-ban-ron-paul-talk/comment-page-4/#comment-441543</link>
		<dc:creator>RickB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 23:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/10/23/why-did-redstatecom-ban-ron-paul-talk/#comment-441543</guid>
		<description>Right on Vickey and Zappa...  These supposed conservatives are just Democrats in disguise...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on Vickey and Zappa&#8230;  These supposed conservatives are just Democrats in disguise&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keeper of jimmy the Dimmi</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/10/23/why-did-redstatecom-ban-ron-paul-talk/comment-page-4/#comment-386642</link>
		<dc:creator>Keeper of jimmy the Dimmi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 03:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/10/23/why-did-redstatecom-ban-ron-paul-talk/#comment-386642</guid>
		<description>Everyone is scared to say the I-word. And is Israel-firsters is manipulating the Americans to fight their wars.

Has anyone been wondering why there isn&#039;t a single Israeli soldier fighting with us in Iraq? After all, we&#039;re sending them a huge amount in aid every-year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone is scared to say the I-word. And is Israel-firsters is manipulating the Americans to fight their wars.</p>
<p>Has anyone been wondering why there isn&#8217;t a single Israeli soldier fighting with us in Iraq? After all, we&#8217;re sending them a huge amount in aid every-year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/10/23/why-did-redstatecom-ban-ron-paul-talk/comment-page-4/#comment-385233</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/10/23/why-did-redstatecom-ban-ron-paul-talk/#comment-385233</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve boycotted Redstate. No more links, traffic, reference, nothing, zip, nada for them.

It is mystifying that the Republican party is all against the only true conservative running, Ron Paul. If you run around quoting the Constitution you are a kook? Wow. Republicans like Bush, McCain all want to legalize illegal immigrants? That&#039;s treason.

Since most Republicans seem to be living in some sort of RepublicanMatrix, let me make it clear to you:   Ron Paul is the only Republican candidate that has a remote chance in hell of winning the next election.

Independents and some Democrats would vote for Ron Paul. Independents and Democrats would not do that for any other Republican candidate.

If Ron Paul is not the candidate, the Republican party is doomed for the next few decades.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve boycotted Redstate. No more links, traffic, reference, nothing, zip, nada for them.</p>
<p>It is mystifying that the Republican party is all against the only true conservative running, Ron Paul. If you run around quoting the Constitution you are a kook? Wow. Republicans like Bush, McCain all want to legalize illegal immigrants? That&#8217;s treason.</p>
<p>Since most Republicans seem to be living in some sort of RepublicanMatrix, let me make it clear to you:   Ron Paul is the only Republican candidate that has a remote chance in hell of winning the next election.</p>
<p>Independents and some Democrats would vote for Ron Paul. Independents and Democrats would not do that for any other Republican candidate.</p>
<p>If Ron Paul is not the candidate, the Republican party is doomed for the next few decades.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vlad</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/10/23/why-did-redstatecom-ban-ron-paul-talk/comment-page-4/#comment-385046</link>
		<dc:creator>Vlad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/10/23/why-did-redstatecom-ban-ron-paul-talk/#comment-385046</guid>
		<description>Its so funny to listen those &quot;government snake&quot;people in audience that are set up to shout boo whenever Ron Paul speaks so that the dumb audience can just follow like sheep and so it sounds on tv like majority is for war. One more example that everything is psychological warfare on all fronts.  .....they all start to tremble when truth is spoken.   ...show must go on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its so funny to listen those &#8220;government snake&#8221;people in audience that are set up to shout boo whenever Ron Paul speaks so that the dumb audience can just follow like sheep and so it sounds on tv like majority is for war. One more example that everything is psychological warfare on all fronts.  &#8230;..they all start to tremble when truth is spoken.   &#8230;show must go on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dale legan</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/10/23/why-did-redstatecom-ban-ron-paul-talk/comment-page-4/#comment-382326</link>
		<dc:creator>dale legan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 05:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/10/23/why-did-redstatecom-ban-ron-paul-talk/#comment-382326</guid>
		<description>I wonder why no one has reported the fact that Ron Paul has also won most of the STRAW POLLS?

http://www.ronpaul2008.com/straw-poll-results

Also, the text message polls were set up so you could only vote one time per phone. No one went out and bought 5,000 phones!  Ron Paul Really Won. 

I&#039;ve voted republican 24 years am I a RINO?  I support Dr. Paul.  I&#039;ll chew my voting arm off before I vote for any of those other hacks who have proved by their record that they are willing to violate the constitution and rule of law.

IF Dr. Paul is not elected our republic is lost, period.  
If Dr. Paul is not the nominee the Dems will win and our economy will collapse.  

NEWT GINGRITCH SAID HE LIKED RON PAUL ON FOX NEWS.

HANNITY WAS ABOUT IN TEARS.  !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder why no one has reported the fact that Ron Paul has also won most of the STRAW POLLS?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ronpaul2008.com/straw-poll-results" rel="nofollow">http://www.ronpaul2008.com/straw-poll-results</a></p>
<p>Also, the text message polls were set up so you could only vote one time per phone. No one went out and bought 5,000 phones!  Ron Paul Really Won. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve voted republican 24 years am I a RINO?  I support Dr. Paul.  I&#8217;ll chew my voting arm off before I vote for any of those other hacks who have proved by their record that they are willing to violate the constitution and rule of law.</p>
<p>IF Dr. Paul is not elected our republic is lost, period.<br />
If Dr. Paul is not the nominee the Dems will win and our economy will collapse.  </p>
<p>NEWT GINGRITCH SAID HE LIKED RON PAUL ON FOX NEWS.</p>
<p>HANNITY WAS ABOUT IN TEARS.  !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy the Dhimmi</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/10/23/why-did-redstatecom-ban-ron-paul-talk/comment-page-4/#comment-382269</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy the Dhimmi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 12:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/10/23/why-did-redstatecom-ban-ron-paul-talk/#comment-382269</guid>
		<description>Well then, you guys can keep deluding yourselves into thinking that Ron Paul actually has 75% of the republican vote locked up.  I&#039;ll see you on super tuesday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well then, you guys can keep deluding yourselves into thinking that Ron Paul actually has 75% of the republican vote locked up.  I&#8217;ll see you on super tuesday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott McDonnell</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/10/23/why-did-redstatecom-ban-ron-paul-talk/comment-page-3/#comment-382264</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott McDonnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 11:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/10/23/why-did-redstatecom-ban-ron-paul-talk/#comment-382264</guid>
		<description>Oh, and btw, Ron Paul supporters. Several bloggers have &quot;declared war&quot; on the Ron Paul supporters. I say we just yawn and ignore them. Pisses them off even more than attacking them. They are truly irrelevent without us. Let them look like the morons that they are, all alone in their hate-filled corner.

With google news, you can see the summary of an article. If it is an attack, just don&#039;t click it. Click on the positive articles to drive up their stats instead. When someone is attacking childishly like Redstate does, there is NO chance of convincing them. And you don&#039;t need to worry about convincing their readers. They are just turned off all on their own.

We have no reason to be angry. Ron Paul is kicking ass with his message. THEY are the ones threatened, not us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and btw, Ron Paul supporters. Several bloggers have &#8220;declared war&#8221; on the Ron Paul supporters. I say we just yawn and ignore them. Pisses them off even more than attacking them. They are truly irrelevent without us. Let them look like the morons that they are, all alone in their hate-filled corner.</p>
<p>With google news, you can see the summary of an article. If it is an attack, just don&#8217;t click it. Click on the positive articles to drive up their stats instead. When someone is attacking childishly like Redstate does, there is NO chance of convincing them. And you don&#8217;t need to worry about convincing their readers. They are just turned off all on their own.</p>
<p>We have no reason to be angry. Ron Paul is kicking ass with his message. THEY are the ones threatened, not us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott McDonnell</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/10/23/why-did-redstatecom-ban-ron-paul-talk/comment-page-3/#comment-382263</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott McDonnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 11:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/10/23/why-did-redstatecom-ban-ron-paul-talk/#comment-382263</guid>
		<description>It should be pointed out that they are digging an even bigger hole for themselves (kinda like GWB&#039;s strategy in the GWOT.)

They are now banning non-Ron-Paul supporters that are dissenting to the ban or pointing out how stupid it is that they are continuing to post anti-Ron Paul crap after getting rid of the supporters so they can&#039;t defend themselves.

They are banning long-time posters (remember they said if you had been there 6 months you could stay? - not true...)

I have to admit, they are certainly putting on a hillarious show!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should be pointed out that they are digging an even bigger hole for themselves (kinda like GWB&#8217;s strategy in the GWOT.)</p>
<p>They are now banning non-Ron-Paul supporters that are dissenting to the ban or pointing out how stupid it is that they are continuing to post anti-Ron Paul crap after getting rid of the supporters so they can&#8217;t defend themselves.</p>
<p>They are banning long-time posters (remember they said if you had been there 6 months you could stay? &#8211; not true&#8230;)</p>
<p>I have to admit, they are certainly putting on a hillarious show!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/10/23/why-did-redstatecom-ban-ron-paul-talk/comment-page-3/#comment-382243</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 05:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/10/23/why-did-redstatecom-ban-ron-paul-talk/#comment-382243</guid>
		<description>I was not going to vote for Ron Paul, but thanks to Red State, I will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was not going to vote for Ron Paul, but thanks to Red State, I will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/10/23/why-did-redstatecom-ban-ron-paul-talk/comment-page-3/#comment-382239</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 05:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/10/23/why-did-redstatecom-ban-ron-paul-talk/#comment-382239</guid>
		<description>Conservatives don&#039;t mind open discussion as long as you share their point of view, if you don&#039;t, then your POV doesn&#039;t count. No blog should censor the points of view of its viewers unless those views are out of line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conservatives don&#8217;t mind open discussion as long as you share their point of view, if you don&#8217;t, then your POV doesn&#8217;t count. No blog should censor the points of view of its viewers unless those views are out of line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mw</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/10/23/why-did-redstatecom-ban-ron-paul-talk/comment-page-3/#comment-382236</link>
		<dc:creator>mw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 04:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/10/23/why-did-redstatecom-ban-ron-paul-talk/#comment-382236</guid>
		<description>John Campbell - Too cool!  

I had to post it on my blog immediately:

&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://westanddivided.blogspot.com/2007/10/ron-paul-kicks-redstate-butt.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ron Paul kicks RedState butt. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;

If there is one thing that neocons cannot tolerate, it is the notion that anyone, particularly Ron Paul  is &quot;bigger&quot; than they are. 

WTF. I think I&#039;ll x-post it here. Later</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Campbell &#8211; Too cool!  </p>
<p>I had to post it on my blog immediately:</p>
<p><i><b><a href="http://westanddivided.blogspot.com/2007/10/ron-paul-kicks-redstate-butt.html" rel="nofollow">Ron Paul kicks RedState butt. </a></b></i></p>
<p>If there is one thing that neocons cannot tolerate, it is the notion that anyone, particularly Ron Paul  is &#8220;bigger&#8221; than they are. </p>
<p>WTF. I think I&#8217;ll x-post it here. Later</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/10/23/why-did-redstatecom-ban-ron-paul-talk/comment-page-3/#comment-382235</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 04:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/10/23/why-did-redstatecom-ban-ron-paul-talk/#comment-382235</guid>
		<description>Right.  Well, here&#039;s how I see things.  The GOP used to be a &quot;big tent&quot; party.  You didn&#039;t have to agree with everyone else, you just had to be generally &quot;conservative&quot; in some sense of the word.  You could be small government, religious, military, economic, etc, so long as you were conservative.  Today this is not so true.  Now to be a welcomed member of the republican party you must be a religious conservative, nationalist, law-and-order conservative (big government conservative like Nixon or Guliani, who believe that the firm hand of government is necessary to keep people in line), or neocon to really be welcome in the party.  As the tent shrinks people will abandon the GOP for third parties, apathy, or god forbid the democrats.  Ron Paul is their oppurtunity to turn this trend around.  They probably won&#039;t take it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right.  Well, here&#8217;s how I see things.  The GOP used to be a &#8220;big tent&#8221; party.  You didn&#8217;t have to agree with everyone else, you just had to be generally &#8220;conservative&#8221; in some sense of the word.  You could be small government, religious, military, economic, etc, so long as you were conservative.  Today this is not so true.  Now to be a welcomed member of the republican party you must be a religious conservative, nationalist, law-and-order conservative (big government conservative like Nixon or Guliani, who believe that the firm hand of government is necessary to keep people in line), or neocon to really be welcome in the party.  As the tent shrinks people will abandon the GOP for third parties, apathy, or god forbid the democrats.  Ron Paul is their oppurtunity to turn this trend around.  They probably won&#8217;t take it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Campbell</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/10/23/why-did-redstatecom-ban-ron-paul-talk/comment-page-3/#comment-382234</link>
		<dc:creator>John Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 03:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/10/23/why-did-redstatecom-ban-ron-paul-talk/#comment-382234</guid>
		<description>I think this just about sums it up:

http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?site0=redstate.com&amp;site1=dailypaul.com&amp;site2=ronpaul2008.com&amp;y=p&amp;z=3&amp;h=300&amp;w=610&amp;range=6m&amp;size=Medium&amp;url=redstate.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this just about sums it up:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?site0=redstate.com&amp;site1=dailypaul.com&amp;site2=ronpaul2008.com&amp;y=p&amp;z=3&amp;h=300&amp;w=610&amp;range=6m&amp;size=Medium&amp;url=redstate.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?site0=redstate.com&amp;site1=dailypaul.com&amp;site2=ronpaul2008.com&amp;y=p&amp;z=3&amp;h=300&amp;w=610&amp;range=6m&amp;size=Medium&amp;url=redstate.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ginger Partington</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/10/23/why-did-redstatecom-ban-ron-paul-talk/comment-page-3/#comment-382232</link>
		<dc:creator>Ginger Partington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 02:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/10/23/why-did-redstatecom-ban-ron-paul-talk/#comment-382232</guid>
		<description>Wow. I&#039;ve seen two identical anti-Paul posts and a couple others complaining of &quot;brownshirt agit-prop tactics screwing up the debate for the rest of us.&quot;

What a spammer this Jimmy the Dimwit is. Thanks for keeping it lively, dude!

Maybe the reason Rudy, Mitt and Fred are doing so well in these polls is because the audience consists of 270 people who voted Republican in the last election, have a landline and are at home between 3 and 4pm. That is why polls are always abysmal indicators of the likely outcome of an election.

It&#039;s a good thing some people still think for themselves. Otherwise, Republican candidates would have no chance running on Hillary&#039;s platform without half of her looks or charm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. I&#8217;ve seen two identical anti-Paul posts and a couple others complaining of &#8220;brownshirt agit-prop tactics screwing up the debate for the rest of us.&#8221;</p>
<p>What a spammer this Jimmy the Dimwit is. Thanks for keeping it lively, dude!</p>
<p>Maybe the reason Rudy, Mitt and Fred are doing so well in these polls is because the audience consists of 270 people who voted Republican in the last election, have a landline and are at home between 3 and 4pm. That is why polls are always abysmal indicators of the likely outcome of an election.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a good thing some people still think for themselves. Otherwise, Republican candidates would have no chance running on Hillary&#8217;s platform without half of her looks or charm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Howard</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/10/23/why-did-redstatecom-ban-ron-paul-talk/comment-page-3/#comment-382229</link>
		<dc:creator>John Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/10/23/why-did-redstatecom-ban-ron-paul-talk/#comment-382229</guid>
		<description>There really are people who enjoy harming others.  They like war - as long as they don&#039;t have to be in it.  They enjoy sarcasm, insult and ridicule more than honest debate.  

Banning Ron Paul defenders and then engaging in wholesale insults and ridicule aimed at Ron Paul defenders is exactly consistent with the kind of armchair sadists who cheer on the wholesale mass murder of defenceless foreiners in the neocon wars. 

These &quot;redstate.com&quot; people, like the dishonest insult-artists running the debates at Fox news, are one of the reasons so many people are turning to Ron Paul.  He is both a gentleman and a scholar.   People are growing weary of the sadistic and cowardly intellectual bullies like &quot;redstate.com&quot;  who want a one-way conversation where they can whip their opponent and the opponent can&#039;t fight back.  They have set up a website to give themselves that ugly little pleasure.  It is fully consistent with their political philosophy promoting war, torture and censorship. 

The principle of human consistency teaches us that war mongers will be debate cheats.  It is to be expected.  We should thank them for repulsing more and more decent people into our liberty-property-peace revolution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There really are people who enjoy harming others.  They like war &#8211; as long as they don&#8217;t have to be in it.  They enjoy sarcasm, insult and ridicule more than honest debate.  </p>
<p>Banning Ron Paul defenders and then engaging in wholesale insults and ridicule aimed at Ron Paul defenders is exactly consistent with the kind of armchair sadists who cheer on the wholesale mass murder of defenceless foreiners in the neocon wars. </p>
<p>These &#8220;redstate.com&#8221; people, like the dishonest insult-artists running the debates at Fox news, are one of the reasons so many people are turning to Ron Paul.  He is both a gentleman and a scholar.   People are growing weary of the sadistic and cowardly intellectual bullies like &#8220;redstate.com&#8221;  who want a one-way conversation where they can whip their opponent and the opponent can&#8217;t fight back.  They have set up a website to give themselves that ugly little pleasure.  It is fully consistent with their political philosophy promoting war, torture and censorship. </p>
<p>The principle of human consistency teaches us that war mongers will be debate cheats.  It is to be expected.  We should thank them for repulsing more and more decent people into our liberty-property-peace revolution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thurston</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/10/23/why-did-redstatecom-ban-ron-paul-talk/comment-page-3/#comment-382228</link>
		<dc:creator>Thurston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 23:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/10/23/why-did-redstatecom-ban-ron-paul-talk/#comment-382228</guid>
		<description>Shouldn&#039;t you note that not all Paul talk was banned.  Only pro-Paul talk is banned.  Anti-Paul remarks are, of course, still &quot;legal&quot; in redstate.

After all, isn&#039;t this the American way?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shouldn&#8217;t you note that not all Paul talk was banned.  Only pro-Paul talk is banned.  Anti-Paul remarks are, of course, still &#8220;legal&#8221; in redstate.</p>
<p>After all, isn&#8217;t this the American way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NH</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/10/23/why-did-redstatecom-ban-ron-paul-talk/comment-page-3/#comment-382225</link>
		<dc:creator>NH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 21:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/10/23/why-did-redstatecom-ban-ron-paul-talk/#comment-382225</guid>
		<description>All of this banning nonsense is just sour grapes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All of this banning nonsense is just sour grapes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tannim</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/10/23/why-did-redstatecom-ban-ron-paul-talk/comment-page-3/#comment-382224</link>
		<dc:creator>Tannim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 21:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/10/23/why-did-redstatecom-ban-ron-paul-talk/#comment-382224</guid>
		<description>Gee, Jimmy the Dimmy, are you a closet redstater?  If so, come on out of the closet, the air of freedom is fine!

Yawn.  Guys like you are amusing in your pathetic-ness.  Just like redstate.

&quot;Hey, you two other guys!  Since our secret spamming operation from Ron Paul&#039;s basement has finally been exposed, what do you say we make a nice little script that spoofs every known IP address and reisters them into the ban list at redstate?  If we do it right  they could ban the Internet (from themselves, that is!)!

&quot;Then we can go and spam more polls and watch Sean Insanity turn even more purple in the face and maybe even blow a vein in his forehead and it&#039;ll be a great old time.  Who&#039;ll bring the popcorn and the latest issue of Scrye Magazine?  I got the Sunny Delight!&quot;

(This satire has been brought to you by the Paul-unteers, who unlike the 6 people at redstate, actually have a sense of humor.  For more information on how you, too, can get this sense of humor, and why it is the best coping mechnaism in this insane world, please see www.ronpaul2008.com today, and don&#039;t delay, political operators are standing by!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, Jimmy the Dimmy, are you a closet redstater?  If so, come on out of the closet, the air of freedom is fine!</p>
<p>Yawn.  Guys like you are amusing in your pathetic-ness.  Just like redstate.</p>
<p>&#8220;Hey, you two other guys!  Since our secret spamming operation from Ron Paul&#8217;s basement has finally been exposed, what do you say we make a nice little script that spoofs every known IP address and reisters them into the ban list at redstate?  If we do it right  they could ban the Internet (from themselves, that is!)!</p>
<p>&#8220;Then we can go and spam more polls and watch Sean Insanity turn even more purple in the face and maybe even blow a vein in his forehead and it&#8217;ll be a great old time.  Who&#8217;ll bring the popcorn and the latest issue of Scrye Magazine?  I got the Sunny Delight!&#8221;</p>
<p>(This satire has been brought to you by the Paul-unteers, who unlike the 6 people at redstate, actually have a sense of humor.  For more information on how you, too, can get this sense of humor, and why it is the best coping mechnaism in this insane world, please see <a href="http://www.ronpaul2008.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.ronpaul2008.com</a> today, and don&#8217;t delay, political operators are standing by!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/10/23/why-did-redstatecom-ban-ron-paul-talk/comment-page-3/#comment-382223</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 21:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/10/23/why-did-redstatecom-ban-ron-paul-talk/#comment-382223</guid>
		<description>It seems that since they banned RP, they can now slam him with impunity.

That, however, still gets hits on search engines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that since they banned RP, they can now slam him with impunity.</p>
<p>That, however, still gets hits on search engines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vicky</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/10/23/why-did-redstatecom-ban-ron-paul-talk/comment-page-3/#comment-382222</link>
		<dc:creator>Vicky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 21:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/10/23/why-did-redstatecom-ban-ron-paul-talk/#comment-382222</guid>
		<description>&quot;You Ron Paullians and your brownshirt agit-prop tactics are screwwing up the debate for the rest of us.&quot;

Jimmy the Dhimwit,

Just what the hell kind of real debate about the other canidates are you trying to have?

Who&#039;s is less evil? Who is neocon enough? Who will nuke Iran? Who will grow government the largest? Who will be the best cop on the world beat? What?!

Please also enlighten us with your wisdom from these debates on your favorite conservative canidate and why.

Think you can do it without mentioning Ron Paul?

Betcha can&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You Ron Paullians and your brownshirt agit-prop tactics are screwwing up the debate for the rest of us.&#8221;</p>
<p>Jimmy the Dhimwit,</p>
<p>Just what the hell kind of real debate about the other canidates are you trying to have?</p>
<p>Who&#8217;s is less evil? Who is neocon enough? Who will nuke Iran? Who will grow government the largest? Who will be the best cop on the world beat? What?!</p>
<p>Please also enlighten us with your wisdom from these debates on your favorite conservative canidate and why.</p>
<p>Think you can do it without mentioning Ron Paul?</p>
<p>Betcha can&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
