What JimmyDim writes here is truthless and he knows it – nice try

>ve heard on this website people claim, “Only Ron Paul can save >merica,” he will “kick the money changers out of the temple” and Ron >aul will “Deliver America into the promised land.” That’s pretty kooky. > don’t hear this rhetoric coming from any other candidate, and I don’t >ee any other candidate recieving upwards of 75% of votes on >nternet polls, or his voteries flooding wbsites with comments en->asse. WTF is going on here? Are you guys so deluded and narcissistic >hat you don’t see there is something extremely unusual about all this?

>Predicted response: “What’s unusual is that Ron Paul will stand up to >he pharisees of America and offer salvation to this country, redeem >he values of the consitution and rebuild the temple in 3 days. RON >AUL 2008!!!”)

Not sure how old you are JimmyDim, I’m guessing not very old because you obviously haven’t been in many campaigns – actually its pretty common stuff for one Candidate to dominate. For example, don’t you think its odd that Hillary has already been crowned President, and that you see here 99% of the time on every station everywhere?
I have actually turned the channel 2-3 times and seen her on every station.
WTF is going on here, is the Mainstream Media delusional and wacked because this is happening? Are they stuck on Hillary and her campaign so much that they are worshipping her?

One last thing JimmyDim, can you please spell Constitution correctly next time.

This is the first time I have seen Republicans, Democrats, liberals, conservatives, Libertarians, Constitution Party members, America First Party Members, Reform Party and Independents come together for one person – its truly amazing and I have been in the political game for a long long time.

Now go back under your rock and try to figure that one out.

Thank you very much for confirming one of my beliefs about libertarianism.

libertarian = selfish sociopath

Is it such a wacko idea to get rid of the IRS? Considering the govt gets a huge chunk of my hard earned money every payday, then when I need help, I get denied..why? Because I make too much money (TX figures out your wages before taxes). Hey, I don’t want to be on the teat, I just want my f-ing money back, so that *I* can provide health care for me and mine.

If the only things that Dr. Paul can get accomplished as president are: a) Begin the slow pullback from empire that we have become, b) reduce or eliminate my tax liability, c) serve as an example of personal excellence, d) overturn most of the presidential directives that undermine liberty; well, he’s earned my vote. Personally, I believe that he will be a one-term, embattled president. Neither party will get behind him, mainly because he represents a threat to the status quo (read: K Street).

Better to keep fighting for the vision of This Great Experiment, rather than submit to the wills of those who would profit from tyranny.

Ron Paul 2008. America Forever.

Lets consider facts folks: we have right now one of the most unpopular presidents in the history of this country sitting in office. The last two elections have sapped quite a bit of true concern and care from the public and people are apathetic. Within such a context, you’ll have the average person out there thinking “I dont really give a crap who wins…as long as its not some Bsuh-republican,” and they’ll take that sentiment to the polls unless they hear different.

Therefore many people will assume that they can only choose from the set of candidates which the Council on Foreign Relations has handed to them. With Hillary posing herself as the “anti-war candidate” even though she isnt, she’ll be guaranteed to grab votes including from the poor sheepish deluded who think Bill’s administration was some sort of “golden age.”

What’s even more alarming about this- is that although ALL of the candidates currently running (except for Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich) are members of the Council on Foreign Relations, most people have no opinion of that organization whatsoever. Not because they did some quick reserach on their own and decided it’s unimportant…but because the vast majority have NEVER EVEN HEARD OF IT and have NO IDEA that virtually all their choices are members of the same thinktank.

This is political apathy and ignorance on a downright frightening level; if 90% of my choices for who sits in the highest office in the country ALL chew the same kind of bubblegum then I’d want to know why such a coincidence exists and just what is so great about that gum.
It’s ASTONISHING that so many are willfully ignorant of the fact that all these candidates belong to the same international organization attended by some of the most powerful international bankers, heads of state, media organizations, and multi-national corporations…and arent interested at all in what the goals of this organization are, what they do, who else belongs to it, and to what ends.

Im voting for Ron Paul not because he is some savior who will wave a wand and fix everything, not because he will end/begin X Y and Z the day he gets into office, and not because he’s “the lesser of two evils.” I’ve studied government long enough and Im grown up enough to know that the president is not the emperor and cannot do this…but that a megalithic federal government with no internal conflict of interest, true differences of opinion, or concern for its actual stated task (serving the people of the US and defending/upholding the constitution) essentially is. As President, Ron Paul could slow this process and help stop us on our road to disaster by actually using his veto pen and leaving most special interest groups out in the cold/aka not taking their bribes which should be a criminal act for those who run this country.

If the following policies and our march towards them/continuing them were even simply SLOWED DOWN it would be enough for me to vote for Ron Paul- yes EVEN DESPITE his $500 donation from a racist that we’re all so curiously fixated on while Hillary takes over $800,000 from a 15 year federal fugitive, felon, and known embezzler:
- Codex Alimentarius/the WTO
- The Council on Foreign Relations’
- The Drug War
- Interventionist policy overseas
- The Federal Reserve

I’d encourage you to familiarize yourselves with just what those are if you arent already.

Jim S – it’s not that I do or don’t think there are enough jobs for those currently receiving handouts from “social programs.” It’s that I simply don’t care.

In my church (and I know my church isn’t an isolated phenomenon), Romney has a wacko base that swears the same deliverance at his hand. Now does that mean that every Romney supporter is “touched” so to say? Of course not.

The same is true of Paul’s supporters, except that while evidence of Paul’s wackos can readily be found on a forum or blog post, to find the same evidence of the other candidates’ wackos requires talking to people comfortable enough to open up to you personally. This is to say nothing about the average signal to noise ratio on any site where anyone may post anything they wish.

So yes jimmy2, I’m sure you’ll get your fanatical response, but attributing the response of any number of odd people to the candidate they support is stupid. By that logic all of the candidates are worthless… hrmmmm actually, maybe you’re on to something.

(Predicted response: “What’s unusual is that Ron Paul will stand up to the pharisees of America and offer salvation to this country, redeem the values of the consitution and rebuild the temple in 3 days. RON PAUL 2008!!!”)

About as delusional as those who think that the campaign promises of the “top tier” candidates are anything more than pillow talk. Although maybe that’s what the jimmys prefer… that way they can act indignant after they’ve given it up on the first night.

Personally I’d rather know where a candidate stands rather than where they say they stand… right now… based on current polling… and considering the current position of the moon.

A kook is foolish or insane. Fools lack common sense and insanity is doing the same thing twice and expecting different results. By my count, that means that anyone who expects the current round of clones, err candidates, to be considerably different than the candidates of the last two decades is in fact a kook.

I can play ad hominem too.

Jimmy D did – first comment in this thread. My comment was more directed at him. I added you to the salutation as an afterthought as I mistakenly thought he was quoting you with the “kooks” comment. I see now he was quoting the ubiquitous “anon”. Sorry about that. Should have been more careful.

Pro-Abortion Democrat guys really just want knock girls up and not have to love them in the morning. Take some personal responsibility. If you don’t love the girl enough to father her child and raise it (even if the pregnancy is unintended), then you should probably not be sleeping with her. Women are wonderful and they should be cared for and loved, not used for play things.

All Ron Paul wants to do is leave abortion up to the States to decide.

It looks a lot more like the Republican partisans who have forgotten what it means to be a conservative, are putting their fingers in their ears and saying over and over again “NYAH! NYAH! NYAH! NYAH! NYAH! – I can’t hear you!”

That includes your ridiculous repetition of the tiresome RedState refrain trying to make something from some neo-nazi nutcase that sends him a contribution. It convinces exactly no one, and says more about you than it does about Ron Paul. I dunno, I guess it probably fees good for you to parrot that crap for each other and anybody else who already feels like you do, so you can hear your message bounce around the echo chamber and pretend you are saying something meaningful.

If any group needs to worry about being tarred by who contributes to their coffers, it’s Republicans.

All you have to do is listen to what RP says, to know that he is not an anti-semite and the polar opposite of a Nazi. I am a Jew and I can see that. I don’t know why you can’t. Unless you are just not listening.

As a very normal person with a profession, a family, and a house I own, I defy the ubiquitous stereotype peddled by Paul-haters, that we’re all a bunch of freaks and spammers. I suppose what annoys these people the most in return is when you ignore their libel and simply get back to the discussion at hand… so let’s do that.

Ron Paul’s supporters are called kooks because they spam comments sections and “debate” Paul’s chances of winning by effectively plugging their ears and screaming his name over and over.

BRAVO!!

And, yes, Ron Paul is opposed to gay marriage or else he wouldn’t consider it a valid proposition that states can ban homosexual activity or any other activity they find immoral while he says the feds shouldn’t be involved at all, including having the Supreme Court able to say that it violates individual rights.