<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hillary&#8217;s Male Problem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2007/11/08/hillarys-male-problem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/11/08/hillarys-male-problem/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 07:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/11/08/hillarys-male-problem/#comment-383442</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 02:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/11/08/hillarys-male-problem/#comment-383442</guid>
		<description>I would love to vote for a qualified woman as president. I just don't think Hillary is the one. She doesn't have the experience. I don't count being married to Bill as 'qualifying " experience. After all he cheated on her and she did little more than cover for him till she could get "her shot"  at power. Her resume is light except for the totally planned things she did in the Senate to position herself for this run. She is very thin skinned, secreative and dogmatic and do we need a president with all the bad qualities of both Bush and Cheney.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to vote for a qualified woman as president. I just don&#8217;t think Hillary is the one. She doesn&#8217;t have the experience. I don&#8217;t count being married to Bill as &#8216;qualifying &#8221; experience. After all he cheated on her and she did little more than cover for him till she could get &#8220;her shot&#8221;  at power. Her resume is light except for the totally planned things she did in the Senate to position herself for this run. She is very thin skinned, secreative and dogmatic and do we need a president with all the bad qualities of both Bush and Cheney.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil K.</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/11/08/hillarys-male-problem/#comment-383434</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 21:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/11/08/hillarys-male-problem/#comment-383434</guid>
		<description>It's not even that Hillary is a woman, it's that she finds *nothing* wrong with corporate lobbying. She certainly does not have my vote. I would vote for a woman if it was the right one. Maybe Sigourney Weaver.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not even that Hillary is a woman, it&#8217;s that she finds *nothing* wrong with corporate lobbying. She certainly does not have my vote. I would vote for a woman if it was the right one. Maybe Sigourney Weaver.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geek for Mike Huckabee</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/11/08/hillarys-male-problem/#comment-383430</link>
		<dc:creator>Geek for Mike Huckabee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/11/08/hillarys-male-problem/#comment-383430</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;50%+ of Married American Men Would Not Vote for Hillary...&lt;/strong&gt;

Additional stats showing that Hillary Clinton's popularity among men is a major area of concern...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>50%+ of Married American Men Would Not Vote for Hillary&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Additional stats showing that Hillary Clinton&#8217;s popularity among men is a major area of concern&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bnvocasapyko</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/11/08/hillarys-male-problem/#comment-383058</link>
		<dc:creator>bnvocasapyko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/11/08/hillarys-male-problem/#comment-383058</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;titpykunywiko...&lt;/strong&gt;

exxiriwexewa...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>titpykunywiko&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>exxiriwexewa&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/11/08/hillarys-male-problem/#comment-382862</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 11:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/11/08/hillarys-male-problem/#comment-382862</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I’m desperate for a Democratic win - but can we stand to be nagged and condescended to for four or eight years by a persed-lipped nanny President? I initially supported Hillary because she represented competence, but I’m thinking twice. Edwards is too feminine,&lt;/i&gt;

Umm, Hillary is a "nanny"?  Dems are like "an annoying wife"?  Edwards is too "feminine"?  You do realize that these comments come off as hostile to women (and gays too, given the Edwards comment).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I’m desperate for a Democratic win - but can we stand to be nagged and condescended to for four or eight years by a persed-lipped nanny President? I initially supported Hillary because she represented competence, but I’m thinking twice. Edwards is too feminine,</i></p>
<p>Umm, Hillary is a &#8220;nanny&#8221;?  Dems are like &#8220;an annoying wife&#8221;?  Edwards is too &#8220;feminine&#8221;?  You do realize that these comments come off as hostile to women (and gays too, given the Edwards comment).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike mceachran</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/11/08/hillarys-male-problem/#comment-382849</link>
		<dc:creator>mike mceachran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 21:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/11/08/hillarys-male-problem/#comment-382849</guid>
		<description>Read my buddy, David Paul Kuhn’s book, The Neglected Voter: White Men and the Democratic Dilemma and read a great analysis of how the Democratic Party has lost the male vote since the Carter administration.  (I'm going to his book party tonight).  Hillary is just another in a long line of Dem candidates who have alienated white male voters.  Dems nag like an annoying wife.  Poor Hillary fits that bill to a tee.  As a white male who is sick of the Republican hypocrisy and incompetence and knee bending to the whacko religious right, I'm desperate for a Democratic win - but can we stand to be nagged and condescended to for four or eight years by a persed-lipped nanny President? I initially supported Hillary because she represented competence, but I'm thinking twice.  Edwards is too feminine, too.   Maybe Barrack, but he seems light.  What's a White male who wants change supposed to do?  This race ain't over, that's for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read my buddy, David Paul Kuhn’s book, The Neglected Voter: White Men and the Democratic Dilemma and read a great analysis of how the Democratic Party has lost the male vote since the Carter administration.  (I&#8217;m going to his book party tonight).  Hillary is just another in a long line of Dem candidates who have alienated white male voters.  Dems nag like an annoying wife.  Poor Hillary fits that bill to a tee.  As a white male who is sick of the Republican hypocrisy and incompetence and knee bending to the whacko religious right, I&#8217;m desperate for a Democratic win - but can we stand to be nagged and condescended to for four or eight years by a persed-lipped nanny President? I initially supported Hillary because she represented competence, but I&#8217;m thinking twice.  Edwards is too feminine, too.   Maybe Barrack, but he seems light.  What&#8217;s a White male who wants change supposed to do?  This race ain&#8217;t over, that&#8217;s for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomo</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/11/08/hillarys-male-problem/#comment-382846</link>
		<dc:creator>tomo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 20:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/11/08/hillarys-male-problem/#comment-382846</guid>
		<description>Hillary will be the democratic candidate!  This type of poll parsing is just fodder for us to keep talking about her!  She has been anointed and, no matter how much the democrat fringe-left complains about her, she will be the candidate... check my post on Presidential Primary Data to see just how big her influence is, not only polls and fundraising, but in web traffic and the blogosphere....
http://thetomoreport.blogspot.com/2007/11/2008-presidential-primary-data-tracker.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary will be the democratic candidate!  This type of poll parsing is just fodder for us to keep talking about her!  She has been anointed and, no matter how much the democrat fringe-left complains about her, she will be the candidate&#8230; check my post on Presidential Primary Data to see just how big her influence is, not only polls and fundraising, but in web traffic and the blogosphere&#8230;.<br />
<a href="http://thetomoreport.blogspot.com/2007/11/2008-presidential-primary-data-tracker.html" rel="nofollow">http://thetomoreport.blogspot.com/2007/11/2008-presidential-primary-data-tracker.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/11/08/hillarys-male-problem/#comment-382845</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 19:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/11/08/hillarys-male-problem/#comment-382845</guid>
		<description>Hillary is such an ambiguous president candidate. First she votes against ethanol then she changes her mind and decides to support it in her energy plan. In the last debate, she contradicted herself in different subjects, which is obvious in this video that compares her many contradictions at the same day: http://www.weshow.com/us/p/22225/the_politics_of_parsing_by_hillary_clinton
You guys that have watched the debate or this video that shows just some of her obvious contradictions should agree with me that we just can't vote for a so clearly pathetic candidate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary is such an ambiguous president candidate. First she votes against ethanol then she changes her mind and decides to support it in her energy plan. In the last debate, she contradicted herself in different subjects, which is obvious in this video that compares her many contradictions at the same day: <a href="http://www.weshow.com/us/p/22225/the_politics_of_parsing_by_hillary_clinton" rel="nofollow">http://www.weshow.com/us/p/22225/the_politics_of_parsing_by_hillary_clinton</a><br />
You guys that have watched the debate or this video that shows just some of her obvious contradictions should agree with me that we just can&#8217;t vote for a so clearly pathetic candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.467 seconds -->
