Comments on: Sponsored Post: PresidentElectionPolls.com Review http://donklephant.com/2007/11/16/sponsored-post-presidentelectionpollscom-review/ Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable. Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:41:00 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Justin Gardner http://donklephant.com/2007/11/16/sponsored-post-presidentelectionpollscom-review/comment-page-1/#comment-383479 Justin Gardner Sat, 17 Nov 2007 16:10:20 +0000 http://donklephant.com/2007/11/16/sponsored-post-presidentelectionpollscom-review/#comment-383479 All sites should have an RSS feed. New York Times has RSS feeds for all of their sections now. Same with all major publications. It's simply an industry standard so people can subscribe to your content. All sites should have an RSS feed. New York Times has RSS feeds for all of their sections now. Same with all major publications. It’s simply an industry standard so people can subscribe to your content.

]]> By: Johnny http://donklephant.com/2007/11/16/sponsored-post-presidentelectionpollscom-review/comment-page-1/#comment-383459 Johnny Sat, 17 Nov 2007 09:03:25 +0000 http://donklephant.com/2007/11/16/sponsored-post-presidentelectionpollscom-review/#comment-383459 This is funny my coworker showed me this site at lunch today. Is it a new site? I thought you were kind of mean... They don't look like a blog so they don't need an RSS feed. Does not look like they have a lot of articles either and I don't think they want to. I mean they say they "archive poll results" not write or analyze. I see them as an upgraded and improved browsable version of pollingreport.com... I guess you right about the design being suck and I never really thought about it. If my friend didnt show me the site maybe I never would have bothered to check it out more than the front page. But if it is as bad as you say I'm sure they would know that they have crappy site stickiness.. just a guess. Well anyways I rate it an 8 because I'm in the political industry and it is imperative sometimes for me to compare large bulks of polls together at a time and with this site I can find whatever I need. Writing articles and all that crap would just get in the way of finding data. That daily news section is eerily out of place LOL... They should junk it or at least make it more visible. Besides they don't even say Ron Paul got 4 million in one day, what a joke .. This is funny my coworker showed me this site at lunch today. Is it a new site?

I thought you were kind of mean… They don’t look like a blog so they don’t need an RSS feed. Does not look like they have a lot of articles either and I don’t think they want to. I mean they say they “archive poll results” not write or analyze.

I see them as an upgraded and improved browsable version of pollingreport.com…

I guess you right about the design being suck and I never really thought about it. If my friend didnt show me the site maybe I never would have bothered to check it out more than the front page. But if it is as bad as you say I’m sure they would know that they have crappy site stickiness.. just a guess.

Well anyways I rate it an 8 because I’m in the political industry and it is imperative sometimes for me to compare large bulks of polls together at a time and with this site I can find whatever I need. Writing articles and all that crap would just get in the way of finding data.

That daily news section is eerily out of place LOL… They should junk it or at least make it more visible. Besides they don’t even say Ron Paul got 4 million in one day, what a joke ..

]]>