<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hillary Is The Least Electable?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2007/12/07/hillary-is-the-least-electable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/12/07/hillary-is-the-least-electable/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 23:56:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David D</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/12/07/hillary-is-the-least-electable/comment-page-1/#comment-385471</link>
		<dc:creator>David D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 16:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/12/07/hillary-is-the-least-electable/#comment-385471</guid>
		<description>Re-Elect Hillary Clinton in 2012</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re-Elect Hillary Clinton in 2012</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/12/07/hillary-is-the-least-electable/comment-page-1/#comment-385449</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 21:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/12/07/hillary-is-the-least-electable/#comment-385449</guid>
		<description>This is supported by no evidence at all besides that one Zogby poll which everyone agreed had methodology issues. Just take a look at these polls from VERY RED STATES in which Clinton is VERY competitive -- much more so than Obama. And you will understand why there is so few evidence for Clinton is the least electable meme:

Let&#039;s start with Kansas, the state in which Clinton will supposedly sink Boyda. A &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaigndiaries.com/2007/11/presidential-diary-kansas-swinging-and.html#comments&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;poll out last week&lt;/a&gt; has Clinton trailing Giuliani 49% to 43%. She leads Romney 48% to 44%. Bush won the state 62% to 37%.In Alabama, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaigndiaries.com/2007/11/democrats-battle-over-health-care-as.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a SUSA poll out last week&lt;/a&gt; has Clinton trailing Giuliani 50-45 and ties Romney. The numbers are similar to another November poll &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaigndiaries.com/2007/11/making-some-sense-of-electability.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;from Rasmussen&lt;/a&gt;. Bush won the state 63% to 37%.The red state where Clinton has been the most consistent has been Kentucky. The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaigndiaries.com/2007/11/morning-polls-clinton-leading-in-yet.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;most recent poll&lt;/a&gt; from the state was released on November 24th and has Clinton leading Giuliani 48% to 44% and crushign Romney 54% to 39%. Bush won the state by 20%.In the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaigndiaries.com/2007/11/democrats-strong-in-minnesota-and.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;latest Missouri poll&lt;/a&gt;, Clinton crushes Rudy Giuliani 48% to 39%, and is ahead by a similar margin against Romney.In Georgia, Clinton trails Giuliani 48% to 44% in a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaigndiaries.com/2007/11/three-states-that-were-not-close-at-all.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;three-weeks-old poll&lt;/a&gt;. Kerry got demolished here 58% to 41%.The same day, a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaigndiaries.com/2007/11/three-states-that-were-not-close-at-all.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tennessee poll&lt;/a&gt; has Clinton trailing Giuliani 45% to 42% and leading Romney 43% to 42%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is supported by no evidence at all besides that one Zogby poll which everyone agreed had methodology issues. Just take a look at these polls from VERY RED STATES in which Clinton is VERY competitive &#8212; much more so than Obama. And you will understand why there is so few evidence for Clinton is the least electable meme:</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s start with Kansas, the state in which Clinton will supposedly sink Boyda. A <a href="http://www.campaigndiaries.com/2007/11/presidential-diary-kansas-swinging-and.html#comments" rel="nofollow">poll out last week</a> has Clinton trailing Giuliani 49% to 43%. She leads Romney 48% to 44%. Bush won the state 62% to 37%.In Alabama, <a href="http://www.campaigndiaries.com/2007/11/democrats-battle-over-health-care-as.html" rel="nofollow">a SUSA poll out last week</a> has Clinton trailing Giuliani 50-45 and ties Romney. The numbers are similar to another November poll <a href="http://www.campaigndiaries.com/2007/11/making-some-sense-of-electability.html" rel="nofollow">from Rasmussen</a>. Bush won the state 63% to 37%.The red state where Clinton has been the most consistent has been Kentucky. The <a href="http://www.campaigndiaries.com/2007/11/morning-polls-clinton-leading-in-yet.html" rel="nofollow">most recent poll</a> from the state was released on November 24th and has Clinton leading Giuliani 48% to 44% and crushign Romney 54% to 39%. Bush won the state by 20%.In the <a href="http://www.campaigndiaries.com/2007/11/democrats-strong-in-minnesota-and.html" rel="nofollow">latest Missouri poll</a>, Clinton crushes Rudy Giuliani 48% to 39%, and is ahead by a similar margin against Romney.In Georgia, Clinton trails Giuliani 48% to 44% in a <a href="http://www.campaigndiaries.com/2007/11/three-states-that-were-not-close-at-all.html" rel="nofollow">three-weeks-old poll</a>. Kerry got demolished here 58% to 41%.The same day, a <a href="http://www.campaigndiaries.com/2007/11/three-states-that-were-not-close-at-all.html" >Tennessee poll</a> has Clinton trailing Giuliani 45% to 42% and leading Romney 43% to 42%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
