<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 3 Reasons Why Ron Paul Should Go 3rd Party</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2007/12/12/3-reasons-why-ron-paul-should-go-3rd-party/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/12/12/3-reasons-why-ron-paul-should-go-3rd-party/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:03:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: disinter</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/12/12/3-reasons-why-ron-paul-should-go-3rd-party/comment-page-3/#comment-385950</link>
		<dc:creator>disinter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 19:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/12/11/3-reasons-why-ron-paul-should-go-3rd-party/#comment-385950</guid>
		<description>Poor Donklephant has succumed to the brainwashing propaganda perpetuated by the MSM.  

Ron Paul CAN win as a Republican,  In fact, that is the only way he can win.  Anyone who wants him to run third party wants him to lose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor Donklephant has succumed to the brainwashing propaganda perpetuated by the MSM.  </p>
<p>Ron Paul CAN win as a Republican,  In fact, that is the only way he can win.  Anyone who wants him to run third party wants him to lose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: disinter</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/12/12/3-reasons-why-ron-paul-should-go-3rd-party/comment-page-3/#comment-385949</link>
		<dc:creator>disinter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 19:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/12/11/3-reasons-why-ron-paul-should-go-3rd-party/#comment-385949</guid>
		<description>Please Protect Us from Ron Paul!

http://www.nolanchart.com/article428.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please Protect Us from Ron Paul!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nolanchart.com/article428.html" >http://www.nolanchart.com/article428.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: All American Blogger</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/12/12/3-reasons-why-ron-paul-should-go-3rd-party/comment-page-3/#comment-385890</link>
		<dc:creator>All American Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 16:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/12/11/3-reasons-why-ron-paul-should-go-3rd-party/#comment-385890</guid>
		<description>The only chance Ron Paul has is to get the Republican nomination.  If he is able to do that he&#039;ll have enough money and press coverage to get his message to the masses.  It&#039;s a real longshot though, and I think most people know it.  I&#039;m definitely a Ron Paul supporter, but without the money and the press you can only do so much in a Presidential race.

If Ron Paul were to make a third-party run he would have no real chance of winning unless he had Ross Perot money.  The idea that Ron Paul should make a non-Republican run is interesting but not really realistic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only chance Ron Paul has is to get the Republican nomination.  If he is able to do that he&#8217;ll have enough money and press coverage to get his message to the masses.  It&#8217;s a real longshot though, and I think most people know it.  I&#8217;m definitely a Ron Paul supporter, but without the money and the press you can only do so much in a Presidential race.</p>
<p>If Ron Paul were to make a third-party run he would have no real chance of winning unless he had Ross Perot money.  The idea that Ron Paul should make a non-Republican run is interesting but not really realistic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dddienst</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/12/12/3-reasons-why-ron-paul-should-go-3rd-party/comment-page-3/#comment-385886</link>
		<dc:creator>dddienst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/12/11/3-reasons-why-ron-paul-should-go-3rd-party/#comment-385886</guid>
		<description>Ross Perot didn&#039;t try to run under a major party and then switch. Texas specifically has a law that prevents anyone who does this from getting on the ballot so if he did he COULD NOT GET ON THE BALLOT IN ALL 50 STATES. He would not be on the ballot in his OWN state! At least for President. 

Ron Paul has made his choice to run for the party to which he belongs and been a elected member of for 20 years. He has rejected the libertarian offer. SO FORGET IT.  The only Choice the GOP has now is to nominate Ron Paul or LOSE the major election with any other candidate because most people that would vote RP (even from the other party) would not vote for any other candidate. Thats the GOP base&#039;s choice now Choose RP and victory or Loose to Hillery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ross Perot didn&#8217;t try to run under a major party and then switch. Texas specifically has a law that prevents anyone who does this from getting on the ballot so if he did he COULD NOT GET ON THE BALLOT IN ALL 50 STATES. He would not be on the ballot in his OWN state! At least for President. </p>
<p>Ron Paul has made his choice to run for the party to which he belongs and been a elected member of for 20 years. He has rejected the libertarian offer. SO FORGET IT.  The only Choice the GOP has now is to nominate Ron Paul or LOSE the major election with any other candidate because most people that would vote RP (even from the other party) would not vote for any other candidate. Thats the GOP base&#8217;s choice now Choose RP and victory or Loose to Hillery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darel</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/12/12/3-reasons-why-ron-paul-should-go-3rd-party/comment-page-3/#comment-385846</link>
		<dc:creator>Darel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 02:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/12/11/3-reasons-why-ron-paul-should-go-3rd-party/#comment-385846</guid>
		<description>Justin,  


I respect your thoughts... As you have mentioned you have offered a 3rd party political scenario often.   

Though I write with a humble hand I must question your authentic understanding of our &quot;Two Party System&quot;?  For sure if a candidate has an endless source of cash a third party run may offer an authentic protest vote.  But until our policies benefit easier inclusion into the political system  a 3rd party message and  opportunity to win is limited.  

Ross Perrot was unique in his time but the opportunity for a 3rd party to obtain the nomination and debate the winning nominated candidates from all parties will not happen.  

Besides I think Dr. Paul has made if clear he will not be running as a 3rd party candidate when he has the opportunity to win the nomination.  

If you haven&#039;t noticed a recent Zobgy poll has Paul winning by nearly 18% when counting &quot;L&#039;, &quot;C&quot;, &quot;R&quot; and &quot;D&quot;.   

Personally I think it&#039;s time to effect change with Dr. Paul&#039;s message right now and use the same grass roots support and begin to call every congress member of every district to support many of his bills.  Once it passes then turn right around and send letters and call our senate members.  I think we could be extremely productive in the political process &quot;RIGHT NOW.&quot;

I have been a GOP member for over 20 years and while at one time I trusted my party leadership I ended my trust nearly three years ago.  Regardless of my lack of trust I can assure you  of a few basic facts which the Ron Paul revolution is already having within the GOP.  Sure, the GOP is very quit about it nationally but locally it&#039;s easy to notice.  What is it?  Well, over the years prior to elections cycles our local GOP meetings usually gather 30-40 for a party meet.   But since April I have noticed a tremendous increase within the GOP.  Here are the facts.... Our 2nd qtr meeting had  62 voters who attended.   I was able to ask a few questions of those who attended if they were new to the area or if a single candidate provided the increase in the GOP.  At that time we had 17 new folks in attendance and they were Paul supporters, Mitt had only one new supporter in the room as did Rudy.  In our area the die hard GOP is supporting McCain even though he broke ranks and supports amnesty.   

During our 3rd qtr meeting we had  119 who attended and they were all new Paul supporters...  No other candidate grew it&#039;s support.....  What is even stranger is that even though Mike Huckabee is rising in the polls he had only four supporters.  The local GOP are still scratching there heads wondering what is going on.  We call it the Ron Paul Revolution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justin,  </p>
<p>I respect your thoughts&#8230; As you have mentioned you have offered a 3rd party political scenario often.   </p>
<p>Though I write with a humble hand I must question your authentic understanding of our &#8220;Two Party System&#8221;?  For sure if a candidate has an endless source of cash a third party run may offer an authentic protest vote.  But until our policies benefit easier inclusion into the political system  a 3rd party message and  opportunity to win is limited.  </p>
<p>Ross Perrot was unique in his time but the opportunity for a 3rd party to obtain the nomination and debate the winning nominated candidates from all parties will not happen.  </p>
<p>Besides I think Dr. Paul has made if clear he will not be running as a 3rd party candidate when he has the opportunity to win the nomination.  </p>
<p>If you haven&#8217;t noticed a recent Zobgy poll has Paul winning by nearly 18% when counting &#8220;L&#8217;, &#8220;C&#8221;, &#8220;R&#8221; and &#8220;D&#8221;.   </p>
<p>Personally I think it&#8217;s time to effect change with Dr. Paul&#8217;s message right now and use the same grass roots support and begin to call every congress member of every district to support many of his bills.  Once it passes then turn right around and send letters and call our senate members.  I think we could be extremely productive in the political process &#8220;RIGHT NOW.&#8221;</p>
<p>I have been a GOP member for over 20 years and while at one time I trusted my party leadership I ended my trust nearly three years ago.  Regardless of my lack of trust I can assure you  of a few basic facts which the Ron Paul revolution is already having within the GOP.  Sure, the GOP is very quit about it nationally but locally it&#8217;s easy to notice.  What is it?  Well, over the years prior to elections cycles our local GOP meetings usually gather 30-40 for a party meet.   But since April I have noticed a tremendous increase within the GOP.  Here are the facts&#8230;. Our 2nd qtr meeting had  62 voters who attended.   I was able to ask a few questions of those who attended if they were new to the area or if a single candidate provided the increase in the GOP.  At that time we had 17 new folks in attendance and they were Paul supporters, Mitt had only one new supporter in the room as did Rudy.  In our area the die hard GOP is supporting McCain even though he broke ranks and supports amnesty.   </p>
<p>During our 3rd qtr meeting we had  119 who attended and they were all new Paul supporters&#8230;  No other candidate grew it&#8217;s support&#8230;..  What is even stranger is that even though Mike Huckabee is rising in the polls he had only four supporters.  The local GOP are still scratching there heads wondering what is going on.  We call it the Ron Paul Revolution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mick Russom</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/12/12/3-reasons-why-ron-paul-should-go-3rd-party/comment-page-3/#comment-385844</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick Russom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 01:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/12/11/3-reasons-why-ron-paul-should-go-3rd-party/#comment-385844</guid>
		<description>The reason he HAS to win the GOP ticket in the USA is simple. Election rigging is so bad, and voter disenfranchisement is so bad, that the only way to even have a chance is to run on a big-Party ticket. PERIOD.

We have no democracy anymore. Russia, Iraq, Venezuela and Mexico, run fair-er elections than the USA does.

Think:
2000 - had bad irregularities
2004 - had a Diebold CEO, Walden Odell, promise bush the Ohio votes in Aug 2003, and he did. Kerry because he works for Bush, didnt challenge the irregularities in Ohio
Christine Gregoire stole an election in plain daylight in King County in Washington State. 
etc.

In fact, last election here in California, I had to vote with a Spanish libertarian polling card because they didnt have libertarian-english poll cards! 

- You have no visibility into the election.
- Vote fraud is real.
- Pollsters rig the polls to help prepare the poor abused public to accept a rigged election
- You no longer control this country. As STALIN said, &quot;its not who votes, its who counts the votes.&quot;
- Primaries are closed up and rigged to keep unwanted voters from spoiling a rigged election. 

So Ron Paul has to run for GOP ticket to not be frauded out of the election. Its a fact:

ELECTIONS IN THE USA ARE FAKE AND YOU HAVE BEEN AND ARE BEING LIED TO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason he HAS to win the GOP ticket in the USA is simple. Election rigging is so bad, and voter disenfranchisement is so bad, that the only way to even have a chance is to run on a big-Party ticket. PERIOD.</p>
<p>We have no democracy anymore. Russia, Iraq, Venezuela and Mexico, run fair-er elections than the USA does.</p>
<p>Think:<br />
2000 &#8211; had bad irregularities<br />
2004 &#8211; had a Diebold CEO, Walden Odell, promise bush the Ohio votes in Aug 2003, and he did. Kerry because he works for Bush, didnt challenge the irregularities in Ohio<br />
Christine Gregoire stole an election in plain daylight in King County in Washington State.<br />
etc.</p>
<p>In fact, last election here in California, I had to vote with a Spanish libertarian polling card because they didnt have libertarian-english poll cards! </p>
<p>- You have no visibility into the election.<br />
- Vote fraud is real.<br />
- Pollsters rig the polls to help prepare the poor abused public to accept a rigged election<br />
- You no longer control this country. As STALIN said, &#8220;its not who votes, its who counts the votes.&#8221;<br />
- Primaries are closed up and rigged to keep unwanted voters from spoiling a rigged election. </p>
<p>So Ron Paul has to run for GOP ticket to not be frauded out of the election. Its a fact:</p>
<p>ELECTIONS IN THE USA ARE FAKE AND YOU HAVE BEEN AND ARE BEING LIED TO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: duke</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/12/12/3-reasons-why-ron-paul-should-go-3rd-party/comment-page-3/#comment-385839</link>
		<dc:creator>duke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 01:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/12/11/3-reasons-why-ron-paul-should-go-3rd-party/#comment-385839</guid>
		<description>Since Ron Paul has run as both a Republican and a third party candidacy, I think he may have a bit more insight into where his best chances lie than you are crediting him with.  The real issue is that he won&#039;t get into the debates, which was not a problem Perot had to face.

Secondly, while I can appreciate your many points, it does not appear clear that you understand that running as a Republican in the primaries, even to the very end does not preclude a 3rd party ticket.  So, what you say, even if 100% fact does not mean he has to quit a mainstream party right now or even any time soon.  Besides, I happen to think he will win the primaries, as his support is already larger than the % that typically vote in primaries, so even if NONE of the usual suspect vote for him, he still has a majority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since Ron Paul has run as both a Republican and a third party candidacy, I think he may have a bit more insight into where his best chances lie than you are crediting him with.  The real issue is that he won&#8217;t get into the debates, which was not a problem Perot had to face.</p>
<p>Secondly, while I can appreciate your many points, it does not appear clear that you understand that running as a Republican in the primaries, even to the very end does not preclude a 3rd party ticket.  So, what you say, even if 100% fact does not mean he has to quit a mainstream party right now or even any time soon.  Besides, I happen to think he will win the primaries, as his support is already larger than the % that typically vote in primaries, so even if NONE of the usual suspect vote for him, he still has a majority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LibertarianRepublican</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/12/12/3-reasons-why-ron-paul-should-go-3rd-party/comment-page-2/#comment-385837</link>
		<dc:creator>LibertarianRepublican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 01:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/12/11/3-reasons-why-ron-paul-should-go-3rd-party/#comment-385837</guid>
		<description>http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?print=yes&amp;id=18555</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?print=yes&#038;id=18555" >http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?print=yes&#038;id=18555</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremiah</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/12/12/3-reasons-why-ron-paul-should-go-3rd-party/comment-page-2/#comment-385836</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremiah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/12/11/3-reasons-why-ron-paul-should-go-3rd-party/#comment-385836</guid>
		<description>Number two is wrong.  &quot;Sore loser laws&quot; in many states prohibit a candidate from running for the same office under another party once they have lost in the primaries.  I know Texas is one of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Number two is wrong.  &#8220;Sore loser laws&#8221; in many states prohibit a candidate from running for the same office under another party once they have lost in the primaries.  I know Texas is one of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda Inveninato</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/12/12/3-reasons-why-ron-paul-should-go-3rd-party/comment-page-2/#comment-385835</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Inveninato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/12/11/3-reasons-why-ron-paul-should-go-3rd-party/#comment-385835</guid>
		<description>Surely RP&#039;s campaign managers have a fine strategy. Instead of second guessing I&#039;ll just continue to contribute,  speak of Ron Paul&#039;s excellent message at every opportunity, and VOTE when the time comes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely RP&#8217;s campaign managers have a fine strategy. Instead of second guessing I&#8217;ll just continue to contribute,  speak of Ron Paul&#8217;s excellent message at every opportunity, and VOTE when the time comes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/12/12/3-reasons-why-ron-paul-should-go-3rd-party/comment-page-2/#comment-385834</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/12/11/3-reasons-why-ron-paul-should-go-3rd-party/#comment-385834</guid>
		<description>I agree with your last two points:  ballot access would not be difficult, and Ron Paul would have a chance to win as a third party candidate.

I strongly disagree with your first point.  Ron Paul doesn&#039;t need the Republican base, if he draws new people into voting in the Republican primaries.  Winning is all about voter turnout, not fitting some existing mold.

There is still no clear Republican front-runner.  There are still 6 viable candidates, including Ron Paul.  It will probably take only 30% of the vote to win the nomination.  With many states being winner-take-all, a candidate with 30% of the vote might earn a majority of the delegates.  30% of Republicans want out of Iraq.  Ron Paul is more conservative than McCain and Giuliani on every other issue.  He is more fiscally conservative than Huckabee, by a long shot.  Fred Thompson isn&#039;t creating 1/10th the excitement that Ron Paul is.

Ron Paul does not need to depend on surprise victories in the early primaries.  He has enough cash to contest the race through February 5th, and beyond if necessary.  He has more volunteers than the other candidates put together, and is one of the few candidates capable of competing in all 50 states.  Only Mitt and Rudy have enough cash to hang with him if it becomes a drawn out race.

Your observations about his viability as a third party candidate are spot on, but it&#039;s much too early to give up the easier route -- winning the Republican nomination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your last two points:  ballot access would not be difficult, and Ron Paul would have a chance to win as a third party candidate.</p>
<p>I strongly disagree with your first point.  Ron Paul doesn&#8217;t need the Republican base, if he draws new people into voting in the Republican primaries.  Winning is all about voter turnout, not fitting some existing mold.</p>
<p>There is still no clear Republican front-runner.  There are still 6 viable candidates, including Ron Paul.  It will probably take only 30% of the vote to win the nomination.  With many states being winner-take-all, a candidate with 30% of the vote might earn a majority of the delegates.  30% of Republicans want out of Iraq.  Ron Paul is more conservative than McCain and Giuliani on every other issue.  He is more fiscally conservative than Huckabee, by a long shot.  Fred Thompson isn&#8217;t creating 1/10th the excitement that Ron Paul is.</p>
<p>Ron Paul does not need to depend on surprise victories in the early primaries.  He has enough cash to contest the race through February 5th, and beyond if necessary.  He has more volunteers than the other candidates put together, and is one of the few candidates capable of competing in all 50 states.  Only Mitt and Rudy have enough cash to hang with him if it becomes a drawn out race.</p>
<p>Your observations about his viability as a third party candidate are spot on, but it&#8217;s much too early to give up the easier route &#8212; winning the Republican nomination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Madison</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/12/12/3-reasons-why-ron-paul-should-go-3rd-party/comment-page-2/#comment-385833</link>
		<dc:creator>James Madison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/12/11/3-reasons-why-ron-paul-should-go-3rd-party/#comment-385833</guid>
		<description>Ron Paul is going to have an overwhelming money advantage going into Super Tuesday on FEB 5.  To suggest he can&#039;t win is ludicrous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron Paul is going to have an overwhelming money advantage going into Super Tuesday on FEB 5.  To suggest he can&#8217;t win is ludicrous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Taht</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/12/12/3-reasons-why-ron-paul-should-go-3rd-party/comment-page-2/#comment-385832</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Taht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/12/11/3-reasons-why-ron-paul-should-go-3rd-party/#comment-385832</guid>
		<description>1) Perot had a net worth in the billions of dollars, and poured a high percentage of that into his 1992 campaign. Ron Paul&#039;s current funding, even with the moneybomb(s), is a mere drop in the bucket compared to what Perot had available.

2) It is much harder to run as a third party today than it was in 92. 

3) Paul has said he wouldn&#039;t run, in almost entirely &quot;no&quot; terms, on multiple occasions.

I think that Paul remaining in Congress, should he lose the republican nomination, would be the best thing for the country and the movement he&#039;s awakened. Remember that the Boston Tea party took place a full 3 years before the actual American Revolution.

Only when the suffering increases to intolerable levels will actual change be feasible. Let there be rolling blackouts, a currency collapse, more torturing liberals, and then and only then, could new blood rise to the top of either party or a third.

In the meantime, trying to take back the Republican party from within strikes me as the best short term and long term strategy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) Perot had a net worth in the billions of dollars, and poured a high percentage of that into his 1992 campaign. Ron Paul&#8217;s current funding, even with the moneybomb(s), is a mere drop in the bucket compared to what Perot had available.</p>
<p>2) It is much harder to run as a third party today than it was in 92. </p>
<p>3) Paul has said he wouldn&#8217;t run, in almost entirely &#8220;no&#8221; terms, on multiple occasions.</p>
<p>I think that Paul remaining in Congress, should he lose the republican nomination, would be the best thing for the country and the movement he&#8217;s awakened. Remember that the Boston Tea party took place a full 3 years before the actual American Revolution.</p>
<p>Only when the suffering increases to intolerable levels will actual change be feasible. Let there be rolling blackouts, a currency collapse, more torturing liberals, and then and only then, could new blood rise to the top of either party or a third.</p>
<p>In the meantime, trying to take back the Republican party from within strikes me as the best short term and long term strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerald Gibson Jr.</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/12/12/3-reasons-why-ron-paul-should-go-3rd-party/comment-page-2/#comment-385827</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Gibson Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/12/11/3-reasons-why-ron-paul-should-go-3rd-party/#comment-385827</guid>
		<description>The Republican party is sick... and so is the Democratic party... but lets start with the Republican party... Dr. Paul has the cure. The corruption piled on top of lies piled on top of emergency measures has made them sick. We dont just need to win. We need to heal the America society. Many of us dont care who has power as long as the government is honest and honestly sticks to the Constitution. We need to heal the Republicans and then the Democrats next... hell maybe making the Democratic elites watch many of their supporters vote for Ron Paul just might straighten them up at the same time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Republican party is sick&#8230; and so is the Democratic party&#8230; but lets start with the Republican party&#8230; Dr. Paul has the cure. The corruption piled on top of lies piled on top of emergency measures has made them sick. We dont just need to win. We need to heal the America society. Many of us dont care who has power as long as the government is honest and honestly sticks to the Constitution. We need to heal the Republicans and then the Democrats next&#8230; hell maybe making the Democratic elites watch many of their supporters vote for Ron Paul just might straighten them up at the same time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard wicks</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/12/12/3-reasons-why-ron-paul-should-go-3rd-party/comment-page-2/#comment-385823</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard wicks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 23:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/12/11/3-reasons-why-ron-paul-should-go-3rd-party/#comment-385823</guid>
		<description>He&#039;s run on a 3rd party ticket before.  He knows that it&#039;s impossible to win on a 3rd party.

It&#039;s much easier for him to win the Republican nomination.  There is huge support for him, and if you don&#039;t believe it, drive around your hometown and see how many signs are up for Paul versus ANY other politician.

I don&#039;t think he should run 3rd party.  He should run on the Republican ticket.  That&#039;s where I&#039;m registered to vote, and that&#039;s how I&#039;m voting for him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s run on a 3rd party ticket before.  He knows that it&#8217;s impossible to win on a 3rd party.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s much easier for him to win the Republican nomination.  There is huge support for him, and if you don&#8217;t believe it, drive around your hometown and see how many signs are up for Paul versus ANY other politician.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think he should run 3rd party.  He should run on the Republican ticket.  That&#8217;s where I&#8217;m registered to vote, and that&#8217;s how I&#8217;m voting for him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/12/12/3-reasons-why-ron-paul-should-go-3rd-party/comment-page-2/#comment-385822</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/12/11/3-reasons-why-ron-paul-should-go-3rd-party/#comment-385822</guid>
		<description>A strong showing in the Repub primary will be a great launch pad for an independent bid. Let&#039;s see what he can do in the primaries first before talking about 3rd party. I&#039;ll say this though... I&#039;ve never seen so many people this excited for a candidate in my entire life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A strong showing in the Repub primary will be a great launch pad for an independent bid. Let&#8217;s see what he can do in the primaries first before talking about 3rd party. I&#8217;ll say this though&#8230; I&#8217;ve never seen so many people this excited for a candidate in my entire life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Ostrowski</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/12/12/3-reasons-why-ron-paul-should-go-3rd-party/comment-page-2/#comment-385821</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Ostrowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/12/11/3-reasons-why-ron-paul-should-go-3rd-party/#comment-385821</guid>
		<description>How many presidents have been elected as the nominees of a third party?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many presidents have been elected as the nominees of a third party?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/12/12/3-reasons-why-ron-paul-should-go-3rd-party/comment-page-2/#comment-385820</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/12/11/3-reasons-why-ron-paul-should-go-3rd-party/#comment-385820</guid>
		<description>AGAIN PEOPLE - THINK ABOUT IT. IF RON PAUL HAS &quot;NO CHANCE,&quot; WHY IS HE BEING PUSHED TO A 3RD PARTY OR INDEPENDENT RUN? These are GOP flunkies talking here, they&#039;re scared s--tless of Paul winning the nomination so they have to throw the 3rd party crock out there &amp; hope his supporters take the bait. Trust me, none of the GOP candidates besides Paul are exciting the grassroots and even the registered Republican base. 

Ron Paul should hold a press conference and blunty state that he WILL NOT run 3rd party. I don&#039;t want Paul running 3rd party, I want him to remain in the GOP and have a legitimate shot at becoming it&#039;s nominee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AGAIN PEOPLE &#8211; THINK ABOUT IT. IF RON PAUL HAS &#8220;NO CHANCE,&#8221; WHY IS HE BEING PUSHED TO A 3RD PARTY OR INDEPENDENT RUN? These are GOP flunkies talking here, they&#8217;re scared s&#8211;tless of Paul winning the nomination so they have to throw the 3rd party crock out there &amp; hope his supporters take the bait. Trust me, none of the GOP candidates besides Paul are exciting the grassroots and even the registered Republican base. </p>
<p>Ron Paul should hold a press conference and blunty state that he WILL NOT run 3rd party. I don&#8217;t want Paul running 3rd party, I want him to remain in the GOP and have a legitimate shot at becoming it&#8217;s nominee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/12/12/3-reasons-why-ron-paul-should-go-3rd-party/comment-page-2/#comment-385819</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/12/11/3-reasons-why-ron-paul-should-go-3rd-party/#comment-385819</guid>
		<description>The people who are pushing for a Ron Paul 3rd party are GOP insiders. DON&#039;T BE FOOLED PEOPLE! The GOP knows that whoever they elect besides Paul is going to lose big time to Hillary. They need Paul to run 3rd party so they can have a scapegoat. Forget it - the 3 &quot;points&quot; mentioned in the article are not facts, they are baseless opinion. 

The Libertarian Party needs to take a hike. They are trying to exploit Ron Paul&#039;s success and ruin it for everyone. Forget it - if Dr. Paul runs 3rd party, he and his supporters will instantaneously be marginalized and he&#039;ll lose a ton of credibility after promising his wife that he would not run 3rd party. 

Now&#039;s the time for the Libertarian Party to work within the GOP and promote change and purge the party of RINO hacks such as Specter, Snow, etc. and big government socons such as Huckabee. Move the GOP back to its true roots, that&#039;s what Paul is doing, and running 3rd party won&#039;t help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The people who are pushing for a Ron Paul 3rd party are GOP insiders. DON&#8217;T BE FOOLED PEOPLE! The GOP knows that whoever they elect besides Paul is going to lose big time to Hillary. They need Paul to run 3rd party so they can have a scapegoat. Forget it &#8211; the 3 &#8220;points&#8221; mentioned in the article are not facts, they are baseless opinion. </p>
<p>The Libertarian Party needs to take a hike. They are trying to exploit Ron Paul&#8217;s success and ruin it for everyone. Forget it &#8211; if Dr. Paul runs 3rd party, he and his supporters will instantaneously be marginalized and he&#8217;ll lose a ton of credibility after promising his wife that he would not run 3rd party. </p>
<p>Now&#8217;s the time for the Libertarian Party to work within the GOP and promote change and purge the party of RINO hacks such as Specter, Snow, etc. and big government socons such as Huckabee. Move the GOP back to its true roots, that&#8217;s what Paul is doing, and running 3rd party won&#8217;t help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PAtravler57</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/12/12/3-reasons-why-ron-paul-should-go-3rd-party/comment-page-2/#comment-385818</link>
		<dc:creator>PAtravler57</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/12/11/3-reasons-why-ron-paul-should-go-3rd-party/#comment-385818</guid>
		<description>Your three reasons sound logical but is there a better way? I think there is. 
1) earnestly seek the Republican nomination keeping in mind it is not over until it is over. - this is a battle for the heart and soul of the republican party. 
2) When and if (1) fails launch a nonprofit foundation to promote the wisdom of Ron Paul through speeches, infomercials and the Internet so that the man and his message are well known. 
3) Continue the grassroots revolution by launching a write in campaign Keeping in mind that 435 house seats and 35 senate seats are up for grabs - A write in campaign by-passes the entire corrupt election system. In my opinion this is better strategy than running as a third party candidate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your three reasons sound logical but is there a better way? I think there is.<br />
1) earnestly seek the Republican nomination keeping in mind it is not over until it is over. &#8211; this is a battle for the heart and soul of the republican party.<br />
2) When and if (1) fails launch a nonprofit foundation to promote the wisdom of Ron Paul through speeches, infomercials and the Internet so that the man and his message are well known.<br />
3) Continue the grassroots revolution by launching a write in campaign Keeping in mind that 435 house seats and 35 senate seats are up for grabs &#8211; A write in campaign by-passes the entire corrupt election system. In my opinion this is better strategy than running as a third party candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

