<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can John Edwards Surprise?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2007/12/14/can-john-edwards-surprise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/12/14/can-john-edwards-surprise/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:08:28 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: wj</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/12/14/can-john-edwards-surprise/comment-page-1/#comment-386155</link>
		<dc:creator>wj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 23:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/12/14/can-john-edwards-surprise/#comment-386155</guid>
		<description>Well this life-long Republican might vote for Edwards . . . if the alternative were a nutcase like Tancredo.  But in general, the Democrats are going to have to go with someone like Obama to have a good shot at my vote in November.  

Even Hilary has a better (not to be confused with good) shot compared to Edwards.  &quot;Electability&quot;?  Edwards?  No way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well this life-long Republican might vote for Edwards . . . if the alternative were a nutcase like Tancredo.  But in general, the Democrats are going to have to go with someone like Obama to have a good shot at my vote in November.  </p>
<p>Even Hilary has a better (not to be confused with good) shot compared to Edwards.  &#8220;Electability&#8221;?  Edwards?  No way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Johnson,PE</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/12/14/can-john-edwards-surprise/comment-page-1/#comment-386137</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Johnson,PE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 15:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/12/14/can-john-edwards-surprise/#comment-386137</guid>
		<description>HERE&#039;S A SLOGAN FOR JOHN EDWARDS: &quot; IT;S THE CONSTITUTION, STUPID! &quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HERE&#8217;S A SLOGAN FOR JOHN EDWARDS: &#8221; IT;S THE CONSTITUTION, STUPID! &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy the Dhimmi</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/12/14/can-john-edwards-surprise/comment-page-1/#comment-386056</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy the Dhimmi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 18:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/12/14/can-john-edwards-surprise/#comment-386056</guid>
		<description>Not to mention that he is a foppish aristocrat who wears women&#039;s skin care products and makeup, gets 400$ haircuts and, as every gay man  in provincetown MA will tell you, he is as closeted homosexual as they come.  It is a guaranteed victory for any Republican if John Edwards wins the nomination.  Ron Paul could even beat him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to mention that he is a foppish aristocrat who wears women&#8217;s skin care products and makeup, gets 400$ haircuts and, as every gay man  in provincetown MA will tell you, he is as closeted homosexual as they come.  It is a guaranteed victory for any Republican if John Edwards wins the nomination.  Ron Paul could even beat him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/12/14/can-john-edwards-surprise/comment-page-1/#comment-386052</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/12/14/can-john-edwards-surprise/#comment-386052</guid>
		<description>Democrats shouldn&#039;t pin their hopes on John Edwards&#039; &quot;electability&quot;. He was already VP on a ticket that tanked in 2004 and as the &quot;southern male&quot; on the Kerry/Edwards bid, he didn&#039;t help them win even ONE southern state. NOT ONE. 

Not to mention the fact that he&#039;s been campaigning in Iowa for 4 YEARS (he never left) and he&#039;s in 3rd place! Edwards is not a good bet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democrats shouldn&#8217;t pin their hopes on John Edwards&#8217; &#8220;electability&#8221;. He was already VP on a ticket that tanked in 2004 and as the &#8220;southern male&#8221; on the Kerry/Edwards bid, he didn&#8217;t help them win even ONE southern state. NOT ONE. </p>
<p>Not to mention the fact that he&#8217;s been campaigning in Iowa for 4 YEARS (he never left) and he&#8217;s in 3rd place! Edwards is not a good bet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
