<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Solar Power Now Cheaper Than Coal?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2007/12/23/solar-power-now-cheaper-than-coal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/12/23/solar-power-now-cheaper-than-coal/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:56:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ziusudra</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/12/23/solar-power-now-cheaper-than-coal/comment-page-1/#comment-387063</link>
		<dc:creator>Ziusudra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 21:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/12/23/solar-power-now-cheaper-than-coal/#comment-387063</guid>
		<description>Indium availability might be a problem for wide spread use.

They&#039;ye pretty tight lipped about the top electrode, but with CIGS there&#039;s more options, so component availability probably isn&#039;t an issue there.

Their panels apparently have a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nanosolar.com/Designedtolast.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;25-year warranty&lt;/a&gt; which I think is a little less than current tech but still long enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indium availability might be a problem for wide spread use.</p>
<p>They&#8217;ye pretty tight lipped about the top electrode, but with CIGS there&#8217;s more options, so component availability probably isn&#8217;t an issue there.</p>
<p>Their panels apparently have a <a href="http://www.nanosolar.com/Designedtolast.htm" >25-year warranty</a> which I think is a little less than current tech but still long enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/12/23/solar-power-now-cheaper-than-coal/comment-page-1/#comment-386877</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 13:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/12/23/solar-power-now-cheaper-than-coal/#comment-386877</guid>
		<description>It may need to move past a sole-manufacturer/proprietary-deal stage in order to see some real widespread use.

But still, very promising.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may need to move past a sole-manufacturer/proprietary-deal stage in order to see some real widespread use.</p>
<p>But still, very promising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
