How about you taking back all your prevarications?
Starting from the ones in the first thread ““Why Do Republicans Fear Huckabee?” followed by the “Obama’s Victory speech” and ending with this one. You misread, misquoted, patronized and cast aspersions. My calling you a moron and a liar was a direct response to your verbal assaults.

To hold opinions that differ with yours doesn’t equate to lying; and the fact that I comment on this blog doesn’t give you the right to get nasty and post all types of bunkum. Others have dissented with me and vice versa but it remained civil and calm. There was one exception, but it never descended to your level.

Finally, read before you leap into rage. My question to probligo was legit.
Ergo, if after reading my opinions you can’t respond in a civil fashion, IGNORE them. I do the same for yours. However, I am not going to stand by if you continue engaging in the above tactics.

Elisabetta:
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1) – Cite This Source – Share This
Mus·lim /?m?zl?m, ?m?z-, ?m?s-/ Pronunciation Key – Show Spelled Pronunciation[muhz-lim, mooz-, moos-] Pronunciation Key – Show IPA Pronunciation adjective, noun, plural -lims, -lim.
–adjective 1. of or pertaining to the religion, law, or civilization of Islam.
–noun 2. an adherent of Islam.
3. Black Muslim.
Also, Moslem, Muslem (for defs. 1, 2).

Do you ever admit you’re wrong?

Really? The word you spelled doesn’t exist in the dictionary. The other variant of muslim is “moslem.”

The rest goes without saying.

Maybe you missed it, but I only respond to the idiot when he engages in ad homs. He can’t discuss the issues and has made unsubstantiated allegations, calling me stupid, liar and worse with such venom on anything I comment that leads me to think he is off his rocker.

Every time I write a positive comment about someone (now it’s Romney) he engages in personal attacks as exemplified in this thread!!

I don’t care if he ignores my posts, but I am not going to let his bouncers remain unchallenged. If anyone here is violating rules of civility, it’s him. You’d put him in place too if he harassed you.

No, but seriously folks, wtf? Calm down. And Elisabetta, your schtick is extremely transparent. Still, it should elicit a response like that from David. Calling people scum? What’s wrong with you?

If this is the type of dialogue you’re going to have, both of you aren’t welcome here. Keep it civil or don’t comment. Pretty simple.

“No one was bashing him on his religion since he’s not now nor ever was a muslem”

Ignorant or deluded. Take your pick. What did you think was the gist of Justin’s post?

and what’s a *muslem*? PAY ATTENTION!! The last question is rhetorical.

“When a viral campaign like this starts – Who starts these things? What kind of person sends them to all of their friends? What are they hoping to achieve?”

The person that put it out there for others to ponder, is none other than Hillary Clinton, aided by other dems. Hillary (as Bill) has smear down to a science. Incidentally she is a woman. Lest we forget, a dem. Her reasons are all too clear.
The causes for the aversion toward her may vary, but her gender is not one of them

Have you taken your drugs today? That foaming at the mouth is repulsive. Your behavior borders stalking.

Just 4 days ago, you posted an absolute canard about something I never said and you call me a liar and stupid?
Here: C:\WINDOWS\Desktop\Obama’s Victory Speech.htm

You are one of those people unable to carry on a conversation outside of verbal attacks. There is no substance to your comments. No matter the topic, all you can spew is “Bush….invectives.”

A fool never knows when to quit. You are a sight to behold.

No one was bashing him on his religion since he’s not now nor ever was a muslem. Liar. You simply can’t help but lie can you? I really, truly don’t think I’ve ever encountered anyone in my life as incredibly dishonest and down right stu-pid as you!!!! No wonder you love Bush.

It seems to me, you have just shown your own preconceptions. After all, it was you that following your thoughts on bias and hatred wrote, “Listen to Jimmy for a good dose of both.”
Were your intentions to be funny, it was in bad taste.

As for me, I wouldn’t vote for either Obama or Clinton or Edwards because of their ideologies. Is that good enough for you?

Apropos of chain letter, all my family and friends know I dislike this method of communication. I am wary of most of them. Never received one dealing with politics and very rarely have forwarded them. Solely the ones dealing with personal safety.
In fact, I delete them, with few exceptions, at once.

Now, I have a question that has been waiting for an answer.

Where do you stand when someone, besides a black dem, gets bashed due to his religion?

fyi, my position – that you continue to misrepresent – hasn’t changed. I was addressing probligo’s irrational logic and I amended one point that came afterwards.
So, continue to pick and choose what you want to focus on….I have wasted enough time responding to you

To Justin ~

perhaps, you should have addressed mw’s personal attacks.

When a viral campaign like this starts – Who starts these things? What kind of person sends them to all of their friends? What are they hoping to achieve?

Here are my answers -

People who are opposed to Obama for any of a number of reasons.

People who agree with the sentiment of the statement, or are sufficiently stupid to believe that because it is on the ‘net it must be true.

Stopping Obama, or whoever, from being elected.

E, have you ever passed on a chain email without checking its validity? If you have, Why? Oh, that should be rhetorical – answer not required. Personally, any of these things coming in my mailbox -whether I agree or not – they just get binned.

But that is just me… BTW this morning’s paper has an article on Obama. I have had no time to read it, but it carries the tempter that the number of Americans who would vote on racial lines has decreased from 56% to just 6%. I withdraw my “racist” comment, but am still nonplussed as to why Muslim is raised as a reason for not voting for the man.

I am satisfied that both Elisabetta and Jimmy have rewritten their positions from what they stated earlier in the thread. All you have to do is read what they wrote.

I seem not to have qualified why Barack was condiered to be a officially a Muslim (that his father was one) in my first post, but I claimed I did in the second one. my mistake.

Anyway, Nothing I said about Sharia law is untrue, but you claim to be an expert on mainstream interpretations of these Mudhabs, so you quote for me a line from those epistles that says apostasy is NOT a crime punishable by death.

I am satisfied that both Elisabetta and Jimmy have rewritten their positions from what they stated earlier in the thread. All you have to do is read what they wrote.

And Jimmy is still wrong about the apostasy, both by describing a minority view of extreme muslims as if holds for the entire religion (it does not – see my learlier comment and link) and by stating it apples to Obama (who never was a muslim).

Now I’m done.