<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McCain Has Romney&#8217;s Number</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/01/04/mccain-has-romneys-number/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/01/04/mccain-has-romneys-number/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:46:37 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: S.W. Anderson</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/01/04/mccain-has-romneys-number/comment-page-1/#comment-387889</link>
		<dc:creator>S.W. Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 08:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/01/04/mccain-has-romneys-number/#comment-387889</guid>
		<description>The change Romney represents is the small change most nonwealthy, not-well-connected Americans will be left with if he gets to continue Bush&#039;s Robin Hood-in-reverse policies.

Romney is also wrong about McCain not representing change. It was reported today McCain would be perfectly OK with keeping our troops in Iraq for 100 years â€”  up 80 years from what he was saying back in November. This is a change from the &quot;until my last day in office&quot; limit Bush put on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The change Romney represents is the small change most nonwealthy, not-well-connected Americans will be left with if he gets to continue Bush&#8217;s Robin Hood-in-reverse policies.</p>
<p>Romney is also wrong about McCain not representing change. It was reported today McCain would be perfectly OK with keeping our troops in Iraq for 100 years â€”  up 80 years from what he was saying back in November. This is a change from the &#8220;until my last day in office&#8221; limit Bush put on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
