<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Word For 2008: Change</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/01/04/the-word-for-2008-change/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/01/04/the-word-for-2008-change/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:03:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donklephant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Keep the change.</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/01/04/the-word-for-2008-change/comment-page-1/#comment-388206</link>
		<dc:creator>Donklephant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Keep the change.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 01:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/01/04/the-word-for-2008-change/#comment-388206</guid>
		<description>[...] post will be a change of pace as we await the results of the New Hampshire primary. One thing is certain, the more things [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post will be a change of pace as we await the results of the New Hampshire primary. One thing is certain, the more things [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy the Dhimmi</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/01/04/the-word-for-2008-change/comment-page-1/#comment-387848</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy the Dhimmi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 00:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/01/04/the-word-for-2008-change/#comment-387848</guid>
		<description>Ok, everyone has mentioned the word, &quot;change.&quot;  Has anybody discussed what specific conditions will be changed, and to what new conditions they will be changed into?

The more people keep talking about &quot;change&quot; as a generalized bromide without any specific protocols for what we will expect to happen, the more things stay the same.  Ironic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, everyone has mentioned the word, &#8220;change.&#8221;  Has anybody discussed what specific conditions will be changed, and to what new conditions they will be changed into?</p>
<p>The more people keep talking about &#8220;change&#8221; as a generalized bromide without any specific protocols for what we will expect to happen, the more things stay the same.  Ironic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elyas</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/01/04/the-word-for-2008-change/comment-page-1/#comment-387839</link>
		<dc:creator>Elyas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 21:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/01/04/the-word-for-2008-change/#comment-387839</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think Obama recognized the zeitgeist so much as he set it in motion. Even when he was trailing in the polls, he set the terms of the debate. He promised change, so Hillary promised change through experience. It&#039;s tough to beat any candidate that sets the terms of the debate for his/her opponent.

Look at 2004. Bush was able to make the election about gay marriage and Kerry&#039;s military record rather than the war and his own presidential record, and Kerry was always on the defensive. Hillary has been playing defense for a while--not in terms of attacking her opponents, but when it comes to leading the discussion--and that&#039;s a big reason her campaign is struggling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think Obama recognized the zeitgeist so much as he set it in motion. Even when he was trailing in the polls, he set the terms of the debate. He promised change, so Hillary promised change through experience. It&#8217;s tough to beat any candidate that sets the terms of the debate for his/her opponent.</p>
<p>Look at 2004. Bush was able to make the election about gay marriage and Kerry&#8217;s military record rather than the war and his own presidential record, and Kerry was always on the defensive. Hillary has been playing defense for a while&#8211;not in terms of attacking her opponents, but when it comes to leading the discussion&#8211;and that&#8217;s a big reason her campaign is struggling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

