http://donklephant.com/2008/01/17/bill-clinton-defends-disenfranchising-nevada-voters/ Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable. Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:56:10 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 http://donklephant.com/2008/01/17/bill-clinton-defends-disenfranchising-nevada-voters/comment-page-1/#comment-388912 Doug’s Dynamic Drivel » Democracy Clinton Style? Fri, 18 Jan 2008 02:55:31 +0000 http://donklephant.com/2008/01/17/bill-clinton-defends-disenfranchising-nevada-voters/#comment-388912 [...] revelation we get news of what’s happening in Nevada where Clinton supporters have, with the blessings apparently of Bill Clinton, done a 180 and started a legal action (that thankfully failed) to block hotel/casino/’strip [...] [...] revelation we get news of what’s happening in Nevada where Clinton supporters have, with the blessings apparently of Bill Clinton, done a 180 and started a legal action (that thankfully failed) to block hotel/casino/’strip [...]

]]> http://donklephant.com/2008/01/17/bill-clinton-defends-disenfranchising-nevada-voters/comment-page-1/#comment-388864 Richard Andre Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:18:58 +0000 http://donklephant.com/2008/01/17/bill-clinton-defends-disenfranchising-nevada-voters/#comment-388864 Bill Clinton Defends Disenfranchising Nevada Voters? here is what I know... It is interested to note that NBC went to court to prevent Kucinich appearing on the debate in Nevada. One on the reason for this censorship is that they are afraid that Kucinich will talk about what happen in New Hampshire. The polls were actually correct; indeed there was a fraud benefiting the so-called surprised winner. Eventually the American people will know the truth. And when that happens the propensity will clearly go toward the leader with the sound judgment not the divider. Kucinich really believe that there was a fraud. He supports this belief with hard cash, by paying for the recounts that is now in order. Kucinich believes that Barrack Obama has won the New Hampshire primary; And Hillary Clinton came in second, if the machine were accurate. Technicians who support the Diebold machine were allowed to break the security seal and to change the memory card on the machine during the Election Day under the pretense that the diebold machine broke down. There seems to be evidence that the surprise winner got a bump of +4.5% and the second candidate’s count was subtracting by 2.5% Bill Clinton Defends Disenfranchising Nevada Voters?
here is what I know…
It is interested to note that NBC went to court to prevent Kucinich appearing on the debate in Nevada. One on the reason for this censorship is that they are afraid that Kucinich will talk about what happen in New Hampshire. The polls were actually correct; indeed there was a fraud benefiting the so-called surprised winner. Eventually the American people will know the truth. And when that happens the propensity will clearly go toward the leader with the sound judgment not the divider. Kucinich really believe that there was a fraud. He supports this belief with hard cash, by paying for the recounts that is now in order. Kucinich believes that Barrack Obama has won the New Hampshire primary; And Hillary Clinton came in second, if the machine were accurate. Technicians who support the Diebold machine were allowed to break the security seal and to change the memory card on the machine during the Election Day under the pretense that the diebold machine broke down. There seems to be evidence that the surprise winner got a bump of +4.5% and the second candidate’s count was subtracting by 2.5%

]]>