<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Go See Cloverfield</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/01/22/go-see-cloverfield/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/01/22/go-see-cloverfield/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/01/22/go-see-cloverfield/#comment-389427</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 03:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/01/22/go-see-cloverfield/#comment-389427</guid>
		<description>More than one blogger has referred to this movie along the lines of "&lt;i&gt;Godzilla&lt;/i&gt; meets &lt;i&gt;Blair Witch Project&lt;/i&gt;". That sounds about right. Spectacular, intense, and &lt;b&gt;short&lt;/b&gt; - only about 90 minutes or so. No bloated eye-candy marathon like so many other movies of this genre are.

As for Lovecraft, you may recall a lot of speculation that the monster in this film was going to be none other than The Big C himself. Even the film's generic title (and lack of an official title at all until around November) and mystery-shrouded marketing campaign subtly allude to this. (In Lovecraftian lore, just mentioning the creature by name is a big no-no, which is why so many alternate spellings have appeared over the years.)

It should also be noted that &lt;i&gt;Cloverfield&lt;/i&gt; has attached the first trailer for J.J. Abrams' next film, the upcoming &lt;i&gt;Star Trek&lt;/i&gt; "reboot" movie, so called because it will reportedly eschew the massive cumulative backstory developed over the years and begin basically anew - a smart move considering how uninspired the last couple of series and movies have been. (Some bloggers have reported a trailer for &lt;i&gt;10,000 B.C.&lt;/i&gt; being shown in place of the &lt;i&gt;Star Trek&lt;/i&gt; trailer. If that's what you got, the &lt;i&gt;Trek&lt;/i&gt; trailer, which is arguably even more cryptic than the ones for &lt;i&gt;Cloverfield&lt;/i&gt;, can be seen &lt;a href="http://www.paramount.com/startrek/" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than one blogger has referred to this movie along the lines of &#8220;<i>Godzilla</i> meets <i>Blair Witch Project</i>&#8220;. That sounds about right. Spectacular, intense, and <b>short</b> - only about 90 minutes or so. No bloated eye-candy marathon like so many other movies of this genre are.</p>
<p>As for Lovecraft, you may recall a lot of speculation that the monster in this film was going to be none other than The Big C himself. Even the film&#8217;s generic title (and lack of an official title at all until around November) and mystery-shrouded marketing campaign subtly allude to this. (In Lovecraftian lore, just mentioning the creature by name is a big no-no, which is why so many alternate spellings have appeared over the years.)</p>
<p>It should also be noted that <i>Cloverfield</i> has attached the first trailer for J.J. Abrams&#8217; next film, the upcoming <i>Star Trek</i> &#8220;reboot&#8221; movie, so called because it will reportedly eschew the massive cumulative backstory developed over the years and begin basically anew - a smart move considering how uninspired the last couple of series and movies have been. (Some bloggers have reported a trailer for <i>10,000 B.C.</i> being shown in place of the <i>Star Trek</i> trailer. If that&#8217;s what you got, the <i>Trek</i> trailer, which is arguably even more cryptic than the ones for <i>Cloverfield</i>, can be seen <a href="http://www.paramount.com/startrek/" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agnostick</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/01/22/go-see-cloverfield/#comment-389395</link>
		<dc:creator>Agnostick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/01/22/go-see-cloverfield/#comment-389395</guid>
		<description>I had a great seat for the very, very first showing in town on Friday afternoon.  I was hyped up about this film from the get-go, because I'm a lifelong "kaiju fan"--I'm one of those nerdy kids who sat in front of the TV many a Friday night and Saturday afternoon during the 1970s, watching every bad Godzilla and Gamera movie that was featured (along with scores of other "horror" flicks).  I still have a soft spot for the first Godzilla film I ever saw, "Gojira tai Hedorâ" ("Godzilla vs. The Smog Monster").

I've since "grown up" a bit, and have built up a nice collection of DVDs of the "Millenium Series," a few of the Heisei Series, and of course, Shusuke Kaneko's groundbreaking "Gamera" trilogy from the late '90s.

So I guess my big response here is "9/11?  What 9/11?  Was that in Cloverfield?  Where?  When?"

Honestly, I never once saw it.  I was far too sucked in by the fact that after watching people scurry down the streets of one Japanese city or another for more than 50 years (the original "Godzilla" was released in 1954), somebody finally wised up and said "HEY!!  Wouldn't it be great if we gave one of the evacuees a HANDICAM?"

There are little splashes of comic relief splashed throughout the movie, but they dry up @ 20 minutes from the end of the movie; it was about 10 minutes from the end when I had a brief realization, "Wow, it sure has gotten quite in here!"

I still haven't really convinced my wife to take the plunge (shaky cameras tend to bring on the barf), but I'm sure she'll weather the storm once it comes out on DVD.

For the rest of you, don't wait for home theater... go see this one on the BIG SCREEN!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a great seat for the very, very first showing in town on Friday afternoon.  I was hyped up about this film from the get-go, because I&#8217;m a lifelong &#8220;kaiju fan&#8221;&#8211;I&#8217;m one of those nerdy kids who sat in front of the TV many a Friday night and Saturday afternoon during the 1970s, watching every bad Godzilla and Gamera movie that was featured (along with scores of other &#8220;horror&#8221; flicks).  I still have a soft spot for the first Godzilla film I ever saw, &#8220;Gojira tai Hedorâ&#8221; (&#8221;Godzilla vs. The Smog Monster&#8221;).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve since &#8220;grown up&#8221; a bit, and have built up a nice collection of DVDs of the &#8220;Millenium Series,&#8221; a few of the Heisei Series, and of course, Shusuke Kaneko&#8217;s groundbreaking &#8220;Gamera&#8221; trilogy from the late &#8217;90s.</p>
<p>So I guess my big response here is &#8220;9/11?  What 9/11?  Was that in Cloverfield?  Where?  When?&#8221;</p>
<p>Honestly, I never once saw it.  I was far too sucked in by the fact that after watching people scurry down the streets of one Japanese city or another for more than 50 years (the original &#8220;Godzilla&#8221; was released in 1954), somebody finally wised up and said &#8220;HEY!!  Wouldn&#8217;t it be great if we gave one of the evacuees a HANDICAM?&#8221;</p>
<p>There are little splashes of comic relief splashed throughout the movie, but they dry up @ 20 minutes from the end of the movie; it was about 10 minutes from the end when I had a brief realization, &#8220;Wow, it sure has gotten quite in here!&#8221;</p>
<p>I still haven&#8217;t really convinced my wife to take the plunge (shaky cameras tend to bring on the barf), but I&#8217;m sure she&#8217;ll weather the storm once it comes out on DVD.</p>
<p>For the rest of you, don&#8217;t wait for home theater&#8230; go see this one on the BIG SCREEN!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.278 seconds -->
