<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Obama Double Hillary&#8217;s Vote Count?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/01/26/will-obama-double-hillarys-vote-count/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/01/26/will-obama-double-hillarys-vote-count/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:03:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/01/26/will-obama-double-hillarys-vote-count/comment-page-1/#comment-389772</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 08:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/01/26/will-obama-double-hillarys-vote-count/#comment-389772</guid>
		<description>Tony, why should the LA caucus, which has super low turnout, which did not decide any national delegates get any coverage?

Anyway, people are congratulating Obama, which is fine, I congratulate him too, but the exit polls is not looking good for Obama. When you do the math, 81% of the people that voted for Obama was African-American&#039;s, while 19% was white. That is a HUGE racial divide and the media is ignoring that. The SC win may change this. Compare this to Clinton, 60% was white and 40% was black. Edwards, 94% was white and 6% was black. That is not a diverse coalition as Obama claims, it is a losing coalition going into February 5. He cannot win with this type of breakdown and the &quot;race wars&quot; in the last three weeks was the most disgusting yet most brilliant thing I have seen thus far in this campaign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony, why should the LA caucus, which has super low turnout, which did not decide any national delegates get any coverage?</p>
<p>Anyway, people are congratulating Obama, which is fine, I congratulate him too, but the exit polls is not looking good for Obama. When you do the math, 81% of the people that voted for Obama was African-American&#8217;s, while 19% was white. That is a HUGE racial divide and the media is ignoring that. The SC win may change this. Compare this to Clinton, 60% was white and 40% was black. Edwards, 94% was white and 6% was black. That is not a diverse coalition as Obama claims, it is a losing coalition going into February 5. He cannot win with this type of breakdown and the &#8220;race wars&#8221; in the last three weeks was the most disgusting yet most brilliant thing I have seen thus far in this campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Lambiris</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/01/26/will-obama-double-hillarys-vote-count/comment-page-1/#comment-389749</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Lambiris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 01:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/01/26/will-obama-double-hillarys-vote-count/#comment-389749</guid>
		<description>Good. I&#039;m not the biggest supporter of any of the democrat candidates, but as far as the top three, Obama is the only one to not have attended any Bilderberg meetings.

No coverage on Ron Paul apparently placing 2nd in Louisiana?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good. I&#8217;m not the biggest supporter of any of the democrat candidates, but as far as the top three, Obama is the only one to not have attended any Bilderberg meetings.</p>
<p>No coverage on Ron Paul apparently placing 2nd in Louisiana?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

