<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ted Kennedy Will Endorse Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/01/27/ted-kennedy-will-endorse-obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/01/27/ted-kennedy-will-endorse-obama/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:39:23 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Polimom</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/01/27/ted-kennedy-will-endorse-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-389789</link>
		<dc:creator>Polimom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 19:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/01/27/ted-kennedy-will-endorse-obama/#comment-389789</guid>
		<description>I had to go consult with Dear Husband on this one.  He thinks that a Ted Kennedy endorsement indicates the Democratic &quot;establishment&quot; is coming apart in the background, and that the Clinton&#039;s can no longer count on those Super Delegates in their back pockets.   That strikes me as a pretty decent analysis, actually.

You may very well be right about an impact on &quot;the base&quot;, too.  Dunno, since I&#039;m totally disengaged from it (on either side).   Which would mean I&#039;m the one misreading.    All very interesting, regardless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had to go consult with Dear Husband on this one.  He thinks that a Ted Kennedy endorsement indicates the Democratic &#8220;establishment&#8221; is coming apart in the background, and that the Clinton&#8217;s can no longer count on those Super Delegates in their back pockets.   That strikes me as a pretty decent analysis, actually.</p>
<p>You may very well be right about an impact on &#8220;the base&#8221;, too.  Dunno, since I&#8217;m totally disengaged from it (on either side).   Which would mean I&#8217;m the one misreading.    All very interesting, regardless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Gardner</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/01/27/ted-kennedy-will-endorse-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-389784</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 18:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/01/27/ted-kennedy-will-endorse-obama/#comment-389784</guid>
		<description>Oh, there&#039;s no doubt that Obama has an uphill climb, but the base loves Kennedy and I don&#039;t think he&#039;ll have the wet blanket effect you&#039;re thinking he will. Still, I could be misreading it. Wouldn&#039;t be the first time. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, there&#8217;s no doubt that Obama has an uphill climb, but the base loves Kennedy and I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;ll have the wet blanket effect you&#8217;re thinking he will. Still, I could be misreading it. Wouldn&#8217;t be the first time. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polimom</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/01/27/ted-kennedy-will-endorse-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-389783</link>
		<dc:creator>Polimom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 18:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/01/27/ted-kennedy-will-endorse-obama/#comment-389783</guid>
		<description>Hi Justin --   Not to sound like a wet blanket or anything, but the Ted Kennedy endorsement may weigh Obama down a tad.  There&#039;s a certain polarizing aura around him that doesn&#039;t really match with Obama&#039;s message.

Also -- The win feels really really good -- I&#039;m with ya! -- and there&#039;s some real energy to be tapped coming out of such a massive win.  BUT, Obama&#039;s road still points pretty much straight uphill against the Clinton lead on Super Tuesday.  I&#039;m hoping, but I&#039;m also kind of holding my breath...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Justin &#8212;   Not to sound like a wet blanket or anything, but the Ted Kennedy endorsement may weigh Obama down a tad.  There&#8217;s a certain polarizing aura around him that doesn&#8217;t really match with Obama&#8217;s message.</p>
<p>Also &#8212; The win feels really really good &#8212; I&#8217;m with ya! &#8212; and there&#8217;s some real energy to be tapped coming out of such a massive win.  BUT, Obama&#8217;s road still points pretty much straight uphill against the Clinton lead on Super Tuesday.  I&#8217;m hoping, but I&#8217;m also kind of holding my breath&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
