<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michael Steele For Republican VP?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/01/28/michael-steele-for-republican-vp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/01/28/michael-steele-for-republican-vp/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:07:11 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: denny</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/01/28/michael-steele-for-republican-vp/comment-page-1/#comment-394394</link>
		<dc:creator>denny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/01/28/michael-steele-for-republican-vp/#comment-394394</guid>
		<description>Michael Steele is far more qualified than Obama was to be a senator. &lt;a href=&quot;http://dirtyelection.com/michael-steele-as-john-mccains-running-mate-top-ten-reasons/mccain/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
Steele is extremely Qualified to be a VICE president. &lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Steele is far more qualified than Obama was to be a senator. <a href="http://dirtyelection.com/michael-steele-as-john-mccains-running-mate-top-ten-reasons/mccain/" rel="nofollow"><br />
Steele is extremely Qualified to be a VICE president. </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donklephant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why Doesn&#8217;t Michael van der Galien Support Obama?</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/01/28/michael-steele-for-republican-vp/comment-page-1/#comment-390046</link>
		<dc:creator>Donklephant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why Doesn&#8217;t Michael van der Galien Support Obama?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/01/28/michael-steele-for-republican-vp/#comment-390046</guid>
		<description>[...] incongruity, at least in terms of experience, was especially evident when Michael thought that the grossly underqualified Michael Steele would make a good GOP VP nominee. Quick background [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] incongruity, at least in terms of experience, was especially evident when Michael thought that the grossly underqualified Michael Steele would make a good GOP VP nominee. Quick background [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shanester</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/01/28/michael-steele-for-republican-vp/comment-page-1/#comment-390006</link>
		<dc:creator>shanester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 03:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/01/28/michael-steele-for-republican-vp/#comment-390006</guid>
		<description>The VP position is more a figure than anything else (unless we elect McCain....). 

Steele is an excellent speaker, even Reagan-like in that department. Plus, he&#039;s head of GOPAC, so he has ties all over the conservative land. He&#039;d make sure that all troops are working (at least) to defeat Hillary/Obama. 

I think it would be a pretty good choice -- better than what&#039;s out there. He&#039;d be MORE conservative than anybody who is running for President (now). 

After 8 years of Steele as VP, what better experienced (and REALLY conservative) candidate would there be? None. Look what we have now. Sheesh. I would actually volunteer 8 years from now after he had that experience - - a real conservative. No... nobody will be Reagan, but at least we&#039;d have someone who is truthful (NOT McCain) and a true conservative (NOT anybody currently running).   

So there!   ;0)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The VP position is more a figure than anything else (unless we elect McCain&#8230;.). </p>
<p>Steele is an excellent speaker, even Reagan-like in that department. Plus, he&#8217;s head of GOPAC, so he has ties all over the conservative land. He&#8217;d make sure that all troops are working (at least) to defeat Hillary/Obama. </p>
<p>I think it would be a pretty good choice &#8212; better than what&#8217;s out there. He&#8217;d be MORE conservative than anybody who is running for President (now). </p>
<p>After 8 years of Steele as VP, what better experienced (and REALLY conservative) candidate would there be? None. Look what we have now. Sheesh. I would actually volunteer 8 years from now after he had that experience &#8211; - a real conservative. No&#8230; nobody will be Reagan, but at least we&#8217;d have someone who is truthful (NOT McCain) and a true conservative (NOT anybody currently running).   </p>
<p>So there!   ;0)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim S</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/01/28/michael-steele-for-republican-vp/comment-page-1/#comment-389903</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 03:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/01/28/michael-steele-for-republican-vp/#comment-389903</guid>
		<description>Michael van der Galien is not a moderate. He&#039;s a conservative. It&#039;s part of why he left The Moderate Voice, IMO. He tried to claim to be a moderate even as all of his positions supported Republicans, and not the ones that Republicans call RINOs, either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael van der Galien is not a moderate. He&#8217;s a conservative. It&#8217;s part of why he left The Moderate Voice, IMO. He tried to claim to be a moderate even as all of his positions supported Republicans, and not the ones that Republicans call RINOs, either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
