<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mitt Romney&#8217;s Speech At CPAC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/02/07/mitt-romneys-speech-at-cpac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/02/07/mitt-romneys-speech-at-cpac/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:05:09 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pdx632</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/02/07/mitt-romneys-speech-at-cpac/comment-page-1/#comment-390704</link>
		<dc:creator>Pdx632</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 20:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/02/07/mitt-romneys-speech-at-cpac/#comment-390704</guid>
		<description>Now that Mitt has dropped out of the race, I am sure that his five sons will be enlisting in the Army or the Marine Corps any day now so that they can fight those evil terrorists that endanger our country. 

If you remember, when asked why his sons weren&#039;t fighting in the war on terror, Mitt replied, that his sons were more valuable to our country serving his campaign and helping him get elected.

If asked now, I am sure Mitt would say that his sons can do more to protect our country by working to prevent the Dems from being elected. You know, if the Dems win in November, then Osama WINS!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that Mitt has dropped out of the race, I am sure that his five sons will be enlisting in the Army or the Marine Corps any day now so that they can fight those evil terrorists that endanger our country. </p>
<p>If you remember, when asked why his sons weren&#8217;t fighting in the war on terror, Mitt replied, that his sons were more valuable to our country serving his campaign and helping him get elected.</p>
<p>If asked now, I am sure Mitt would say that his sons can do more to protect our country by working to prevent the Dems from being elected. You know, if the Dems win in November, then Osama WINS!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: We&#8217;re Looking Through You, Mitt &#171; Liberty Street</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/02/07/mitt-romneys-speech-at-cpac/comment-page-1/#comment-390660</link>
		<dc:creator>We&#8217;re Looking Through You, Mitt &#171; Liberty Street</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 03:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/02/07/mitt-romneys-speech-at-cpac/#comment-390660</guid>
		<description>[...] Through You,&#160;Mitt  Posted on February 8, 2008 by Kathy   I left out of my Romney Roundup this great comment from Justin Gardner, about the Romney speech: If Mitt keeps going, the terrorists [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Through You,&nbsp;Mitt  Posted on February 8, 2008 by Kathy   I left out of my Romney Roundup this great comment from Justin Gardner, about the Romney speech: If Mitt keeps going, the terrorists [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/02/07/mitt-romneys-speech-at-cpac/comment-page-1/#comment-390637</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 01:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/02/07/mitt-romneys-speech-at-cpac/#comment-390637</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;By the way, did you notice how the people at CPAC just donâ€™t like McCain?&lt;/i&gt;

More of those &quot;suicide Republicans&quot;, maybe?

Speaking of which, in response to your earlier post about new words/terms that have cropped up in the campaign, I&#039;ve started to see the phrase &quot;McCain Derangement Syndrome&quot; (MDS) bandied about on the right side of the blogosphere. Unlike its precursor of &quot;Bush Derangement Syndrome&quot; though, MDS is a term conservative bloggers/commentators are using to describe fellow conservatives - and in a few cases, even themselves.

It seems that MDS has already taken hold at CPAC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>By the way, did you notice how the people at CPAC just donâ€™t like McCain?</i></p>
<p>More of those &#8220;suicide Republicans&#8221;, maybe?</p>
<p>Speaking of which, in response to your earlier post about new words/terms that have cropped up in the campaign, I&#8217;ve started to see the phrase &#8220;McCain Derangement Syndrome&#8221; (MDS) bandied about on the right side of the blogosphere. Unlike its precursor of &#8220;Bush Derangement Syndrome&#8221; though, MDS is a term conservative bloggers/commentators are using to describe fellow conservatives &#8211; and in a few cases, even themselves.</p>
<p>It seems that MDS has already taken hold at CPAC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
