Virtually Impossible Clinton Can Get More Pledged Delegates

By Justin Gardner | Related entries in 2008 Election, Barack, Democrats, Hillary, Super Delegates!!!, Video

Howard Fineman has the scoop…

Listen, if her camp really thinks they can use the super delegates to capture the nomination, they’re fooling themselves. That is pure political fantasy. Is it technically possible? Sure, but there would be an upheaval in the Democratic party the likes of which can not even be imagined. Would she really do that to her party? I think the answer will ultimately prove to be no, but I guess we’ll see.

On the other hand, this is big, big, big news for Obama because what it suggests, barring any big mistakes, is that he has a very clear and credible path to the nomination. Hillary’s camp took their eye off the ball in these post Super Tuesday states and it looks very likely to kill her chances at becoming the Democratic nominee.

More as it develops…


This entry was posted on Tuesday, February 12th, 2008 and is filed under 2008 Election, Barack, Democrats, Hillary, Super Delegates!!!, Video. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

4 Responses to “Virtually Impossible Clinton Can Get More Pledged Delegates”

  1. James Says:

    Hillary is toast…

  2. Below The Beltway » Blog Archive » Howard Fineman: Hillary Can’t Win Says:

    [...] agree with Justin Gardner, if Hillary thinks she can use the superdelegates to steal this nomination, she’s kidding [...]

  3. Bubbles Says:

    Hillary getting the nomination via superdelegate votes would not look good. It would make her look like a politician desperate to do anything it takes to win. Having the Democratic nominee chosen in such a non-democratic way would effectively keep the White House in Republican hands for another four years. I can’t see how a Hillary superdelegate victory could avoid being spun in the worst way possible.

  4. Elisabetta Says:

    Bubbles says: Hillary getting the nomination via superdelegate votes…would make her look like a politician desperate to do anything it takes to win. Having the Democratic nominee chosen in such a non-democratic way would effectively keep the White House in Republican hands for another four years.”
    I can’t see how a Hillary superdelegate victory could avoid being spun in the worst way possible.”

    Agree with that take. Now, are you spinning? Because if you are not, neither will the republicans.
    They will merely point out the obvious. Same as you are doing.

    I find it amusing the same party that constantly cries ‘disenfranchiment’ and touts ‘fairness’ employs such a method to arrive at their nominee, making null everybody else’s vote.
    Blatant hypocrisy and double talk.

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: