<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Virtually Impossible Clinton Can Get More Pledged Delegates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/02/12/virtually-impossible-clinton-can-get-more-pledged-delegates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/02/12/virtually-impossible-clinton-can-get-more-pledged-delegates/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:33:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Elisabetta</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/02/12/virtually-impossible-clinton-can-get-more-pledged-delegates/comment-page-1/#comment-390989</link>
		<dc:creator>Elisabetta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/02/12/virtually-impossible-clinton-can-get-more-pledged-delegates/#comment-390989</guid>
		<description>Bubbles says: Hillary getting the nomination via superdelegate votes...would make her look like a politician desperate to do anything it takes to win. Having the Democratic nominee chosen in such a non-democratic way would effectively keep the White House in Republican hands for another four years.&quot;
I canâ€™t see how a Hillary superdelegate victory could avoid being spun in the worst way possible.&quot;

Agree with that take. Now, are you spinning? Because if you are not, neither will the republicans. 
They will merely point out the obvious. Same as you are doing.

I find it amusing the same party that constantly cries &#039;disenfranchiment&#039; and touts &#039;fairness&#039; employs such a method to arrive at their nominee, making null everybody else&#039;s vote.
Blatant hypocrisy and double talk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bubbles says: Hillary getting the nomination via superdelegate votes&#8230;would make her look like a politician desperate to do anything it takes to win. Having the Democratic nominee chosen in such a non-democratic way would effectively keep the White House in Republican hands for another four years.&#8221;<br />
I canâ€™t see how a Hillary superdelegate victory could avoid being spun in the worst way possible.&#8221;</p>
<p>Agree with that take. Now, are you spinning? Because if you are not, neither will the republicans.<br />
They will merely point out the obvious. Same as you are doing.</p>
<p>I find it amusing the same party that constantly cries &#8216;disenfranchiment&#8217; and touts &#8216;fairness&#8217; employs such a method to arrive at their nominee, making null everybody else&#8217;s vote.<br />
Blatant hypocrisy and double talk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bubbles</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/02/12/virtually-impossible-clinton-can-get-more-pledged-delegates/comment-page-1/#comment-390972</link>
		<dc:creator>Bubbles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/02/12/virtually-impossible-clinton-can-get-more-pledged-delegates/#comment-390972</guid>
		<description>Hillary getting the nomination via superdelegate votes would not look good. It would make her look like a politician desperate to do anything it takes to win. Having the Democratic nominee chosen in such a non-democratic way would effectively keep the White House in Republican hands for another four years. I can&#039;t see how a Hillary superdelegate victory could avoid being spun in the worst way possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary getting the nomination via superdelegate votes would not look good. It would make her look like a politician desperate to do anything it takes to win. Having the Democratic nominee chosen in such a non-democratic way would effectively keep the White House in Republican hands for another four years. I can&#8217;t see how a Hillary superdelegate victory could avoid being spun in the worst way possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Below The Beltway &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Howard Fineman: Hillary Can&#8217;t Win</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/02/12/virtually-impossible-clinton-can-get-more-pledged-delegates/comment-page-1/#comment-390967</link>
		<dc:creator>Below The Beltway &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Howard Fineman: Hillary Can&#8217;t Win</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/02/12/virtually-impossible-clinton-can-get-more-pledged-delegates/#comment-390967</guid>
		<description>[...] agree with Justin Gardner, if Hillary thinks she can use the superdelegates to steal this nomination, she&#8217;s kidding [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] agree with Justin Gardner, if Hillary thinks she can use the superdelegates to steal this nomination, she&#8217;s kidding [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/02/12/virtually-impossible-clinton-can-get-more-pledged-delegates/comment-page-1/#comment-390957</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 07:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/02/12/virtually-impossible-clinton-can-get-more-pledged-delegates/#comment-390957</guid>
		<description>Hillary is toast...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary is toast&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
