If Obama still has more delegates after losing three big states in a row, but is still within a 150-200 delegates, then its a tie. The Superdelegates can, will and should decide. that is there job. That is why they exist, to make the best decision for the Democratic Party.

Clinton will have a great argument to make to the superdelegates, that she is the best candidate for the Dems in November, based on that finish. You can agree with it or not, but it is a good argument. If she takes those three states, I think she wins that argument and the nomination.

If I thought Clinton was the best choice, I wouldn’t give Bill’s extracurricular activities a second thought. After all, I supported him back in 1992 even after he admitted to having affairs. So why wouldn’t I back someone who’s never been credibly charged with adultery?

Do you really believe the Clinton’s are so stupid as to think that publishing that picture would change votes?

Well, they thought that their ridiculous plagiarism charge would work, so I’d have to say yes, they are that stupid. Tellingly, the Clinton campaign failed to issue a denial.

And I don’t know if you could say I was offering advice. I was pointing out that an ethical person would not use the tactics that the Clinton campaign has stooped to in recent days. So in this case, I’m using “should” to make a point about ethics, which isn’t the same thing as giving advice.

“Hillary Clinton is also getting a lot of advice. Gordo advises that “Clinton should back off” and Jonathon Alter at Newsweek wants her to “get out now“. “

… is completely consistent with your statement. I did not say you were calling for her to drop out. I did say that Alter was calling for her to drop out.

That said, you did use the “stick a fork in her campaign” phrase in that post.

Also I’d point you to my comment on Justin’s “give Clinton the benefit of the doubt” post regarding bloggers buying hook, line, and sinker into the Obama campaign’s much more effective smear of the Clinton campaign over this truly stupid picture. Do you really believe the Clinton’s are so stupid as to think that publishing that picture would change votes? On the other hand, smearing the Clinton campaign as sleazy will change votes.

I can only imagine the honeypots that would be dangled in front of Bill by Republicans, let alone any country that wants to embarrass the USA. Or is that an issued that isn’t of concern?

Clinton’s tactics are very divisive, and they’ll greatly hurt the party if she continues. If she wins the nomination with her Swift Boat tactics, then she’ll have a much harder time fighting for the changes that we need to make in order to clean up the mess left behind by the Bush administration. So if she can win on the issues, fine. But she should back off from the strategy of using unfounded attacks and backroom deals to win the nomination.

Rob,
I thought about doing a “Bob the Builder” mash-up but no need, several you-tubers beat me to it. There are some variations on the theme out there.

It would be funny as hell if Obama adopted “Bob the Builder” theme music for the campaign.

But what about Saudi Arabia and all the $$$ they have given to the Bush-Clinton??