<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Would Pick Republicans For Cabinet?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/03/02/obama-would-pick-republicans-for-cabinet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/02/obama-would-pick-republicans-for-cabinet/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:58:18 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bob Aman</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/02/obama-would-pick-republicans-for-cabinet/comment-page-1/#comment-392566</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Aman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/02/obama-would-pick-republicans-for-cabinet/#comment-392566</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m all for it.  I highly doubt we&#039;d see Hagel as a VP, but SecDef makes a lot of sense.  Bill Gates may have been a good choice, but I&#039;m inclined to say Hagel would be a better one, if for no other reason than that it removes all doubt that we&#039;ll get &quot;more of the same&quot;.  As for S.W. Anderson&#039;s concern about Hagel being set up for a presidential run in 8 years, well, frankly, I&#039;d love to see Hagel run.  I&#039;m voting for Obama because I think character and judgement are more important than ideology, and I would vote for Hagel for the exact same reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m all for it.  I highly doubt we&#8217;d see Hagel as a VP, but SecDef makes a lot of sense.  Bill Gates may have been a good choice, but I&#8217;m inclined to say Hagel would be a better one, if for no other reason than that it removes all doubt that we&#8217;ll get &#8220;more of the same&#8221;.  As for S.W. Anderson&#8217;s concern about Hagel being set up for a presidential run in 8 years, well, frankly, I&#8217;d love to see Hagel run.  I&#8217;m voting for Obama because I think character and judgement are more important than ideology, and I would vote for Hagel for the exact same reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mw</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/02/obama-would-pick-republicans-for-cabinet/comment-page-1/#comment-392511</link>
		<dc:creator>mw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 03:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/02/obama-would-pick-republicans-for-cabinet/#comment-392511</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t believe it for a minute, but if Obama were to commit to putting Hagel in the SecDef role, I&#039;d jump on the bandwagon. Hagel fills in Obama&#039;s experience gap nicely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t believe it for a minute, but if Obama were to commit to putting Hagel in the SecDef role, I&#8217;d jump on the bandwagon. Hagel fills in Obama&#8217;s experience gap nicely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S.W. Anderson</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/02/obama-would-pick-republicans-for-cabinet/comment-page-1/#comment-392505</link>
		<dc:creator>S.W. Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 02:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/02/obama-would-pick-republicans-for-cabinet/#comment-392505</guid>
		<description>Pdx632, looking back over the last almost eight years, this country would be a lot better off it &lt;i&gt;was&lt;/i&gt; the United States of Democrats.

Republicans&#039;  record of lying, cheating, trampling the Constitution, violating statutory law, corruption, cover-ups and the grossest incompetence in U.S. history cause me and many others to think intelligent choices based in part on party make good sense.

It never ceases to amaze me, in our current situation, when people talk up putting an end to partisanship. Now that we have screwups, setbacks and messes as far as the eye can see, all of them made by the most rabidly partisan pack of jackals in a century, we&#039;re all supposed to join hands and march together toward some middle-of-the-road Utopia where never is heard a discouraging or partisan word. 

That&#039;s not going to happen because most Americans are smarter than that. They know they&#039;ve been screwed over and they know who did it. 

This sudden insistence on  bipartisanship comes off the way it would have if Hitler, when the Red Army and Allied forces were closing in on his underground bunker, had proposed just stopping the fighting and letting bygones be bygones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pdx632, looking back over the last almost eight years, this country would be a lot better off it <i>was</i> the United States of Democrats.</p>
<p>Republicans&#8217;  record of lying, cheating, trampling the Constitution, violating statutory law, corruption, cover-ups and the grossest incompetence in U.S. history cause me and many others to think intelligent choices based in part on party make good sense.</p>
<p>It never ceases to amaze me, in our current situation, when people talk up putting an end to partisanship. Now that we have screwups, setbacks and messes as far as the eye can see, all of them made by the most rabidly partisan pack of jackals in a century, we&#8217;re all supposed to join hands and march together toward some middle-of-the-road Utopia where never is heard a discouraging or partisan word. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s not going to happen because most Americans are smarter than that. They know they&#8217;ve been screwed over and they know who did it. </p>
<p>This sudden insistence on  bipartisanship comes off the way it would have if Hitler, when the Red Army and Allied forces were closing in on his underground bunker, had proposed just stopping the fighting and letting bygones be bygones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pdx632</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/02/obama-would-pick-republicans-for-cabinet/comment-page-1/#comment-392495</link>
		<dc:creator>Pdx632</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 22:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/02/obama-would-pick-republicans-for-cabinet/#comment-392495</guid>
		<description>The job of the President is to put in place the most qualified person for the job. Party be damned. By having a bi-partisan cabinet, Barack would move this country by leaps and bounds forward in our efforts to eliminate partisan politics. We are the United States of America, not the United States of Democrats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The job of the President is to put in place the most qualified person for the job. Party be damned. By having a bi-partisan cabinet, Barack would move this country by leaps and bounds forward in our efforts to eliminate partisan politics. We are the United States of America, not the United States of Democrats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S.W. Anderson</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/02/obama-would-pick-republicans-for-cabinet/comment-page-1/#comment-392491</link>
		<dc:creator>S.W. Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 20:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/02/obama-would-pick-republicans-for-cabinet/#comment-392491</guid>
		<description>More recently, President Clinton appointed moderate Republican William Cohen as Defense secretary, a very good choice as it turned out. 

Hagel might be good in that job, too. I&#039;ve already said the next president should consider keeping Bill Gates on at Defense. He&#039;s the one really good appointment Bush ever made, and is doing a good job under very trying circumstances. If he&#039;d be willing, Sen. John Warner would also be a natural in that post.

As far as choosing Hagel for vice president, no, no, no. Nothing doing,  unless Hagel is willing to switch parties, which seems unlikely. Hagel as V.P. might set Obama&#039;s good friend up for a presidential run in eight years. If he was successful, we would have another GOP administration and all the never-ending crap that goes with it â€” even if Hagel himself is a basically decent guy. 

Besides, that&#039;s no way for Obama to treat all the loyal Democrats who are supporting him with everything they&#039;ve got. There are plenty of topnotch Democrats who would make an excellent vice president. The names Edwards, Dodd and Daschle spring to mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More recently, President Clinton appointed moderate Republican William Cohen as Defense secretary, a very good choice as it turned out. </p>
<p>Hagel might be good in that job, too. I&#8217;ve already said the next president should consider keeping Bill Gates on at Defense. He&#8217;s the one really good appointment Bush ever made, and is doing a good job under very trying circumstances. If he&#8217;d be willing, Sen. John Warner would also be a natural in that post.</p>
<p>As far as choosing Hagel for vice president, no, no, no. Nothing doing,  unless Hagel is willing to switch parties, which seems unlikely. Hagel as V.P. might set Obama&#8217;s good friend up for a presidential run in eight years. If he was successful, we would have another GOP administration and all the never-ending crap that goes with it â€” even if Hagel himself is a basically decent guy. </p>
<p>Besides, that&#8217;s no way for Obama to treat all the loyal Democrats who are supporting him with everything they&#8217;ve got. There are plenty of topnotch Democrats who would make an excellent vice president. The names Edwards, Dodd and Daschle spring to mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An Obama Presidency Likely To Include Republicans In High Places</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/02/obama-would-pick-republicans-for-cabinet/comment-page-1/#comment-392489</link>
		<dc:creator>An Obama Presidency Likely To Include Republicans In High Places</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 19:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/02/obama-would-pick-republicans-for-cabinet/#comment-392489</guid>
		<description>[...] Also (H/T to MemeOrandum): The Moderate Voice; Donklephant; Polimom Says; Sadly, No!; Open Left Tags: Politics, State Politics, National Politics, Think, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Also (H/T to MemeOrandum): The Moderate Voice; Donklephant; Polimom Says; Sadly, No!; Open Left Tags: Politics, State Politics, National Politics, Think, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/02/obama-would-pick-republicans-for-cabinet/comment-page-1/#comment-392486</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 16:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/02/obama-would-pick-republicans-for-cabinet/#comment-392486</guid>
		<description>Good on several levels:

1) The best person should get the job, period.
2) He&#039;d be backing up his message of bipartisanship and unity.
3) Plucking popular Republican senators out of Congress could help build a majority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good on several levels:</p>
<p>1) The best person should get the job, period.<br />
2) He&#8217;d be backing up his message of bipartisanship and unity.<br />
3) Plucking popular Republican senators out of Congress could help build a majority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
