Why Haven’t They Called Ohio For Hillary?

By Justin Gardner | Related entries in 2008 Election, Barack, Hillary, Ohio

Actually I know the answer to this one, or at least I think I do.

It’s because the polls haven’t closed yet and it’s possible they’ll stay open quite late in some parts of the weather beaten state.

But right now, with 21% reporting, she’s up 59% to 39%. I don’t see how Obama can make up enough ground to actually beat her. I mean, I do know that Cleveland is one of the locales that won’t close polls until late, but still…there’s no way.

Put Ohio in Hill’s column. It’s done.

UPDATE:
Josh Marshall concurs…

So here’s a question. Almost 40% of the votes are in in Ohio. And Hillary Clinton has a big 16 point margin which really hasn’t budged much all evening. So why haven’t they called this thing yet? According to Chuck Todd on MSNBC a number of big cities, which are supposed to be Obama strongholds, still haven’t reported yet. Still, he’d have to manage something pretty extraordinary in those jurisdictions to even get this one close.

Just call it already folks. Obama is not going to get 65% of the vote in the big cities. It ain’t gonna happen. I applaud the fact that they don’t want to discourage people from voting since polls are still open, but it’s almost 11 on the east coast. Call it a night.

UPDATE 2:
Here’s some spin from the Obama campaign…

Obama campaign advisers are privately urging the networks and media figures to consider, as they evaluate the incoming results, that in Ohio there are areas where as much as 15% of the vote is provisional ballots. [...]

In conversations with media figures, Obama aides are pointing out that the nets erroneously called Missouri for Hillary before the provisional ballots came in and were later forced to reverse the results when those ballots came in from the St. Louis area and put Obama over the top.

Sure, they did get Missouri wrong, but it was much closer by this time, wasn’t it? Honestly, I can’t remember now, but I do remember I called it for Obama before the nets did.

Still, I think Hill has Ohio locked up.


This entry was posted on Tuesday, March 4th, 2008 and is filed under 2008 Election, Barack, Hillary, Ohio. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

2 Responses to “Why Haven’t They Called Ohio For Hillary?”

  1. Swatty Says:

    To prevent a repeat of what happened in Missouri. They called it for Hillary without taking into consideration that the early percentages were from the rural areas.

    Swatty

  2. mw Says:

    MSNBC says none of the big cities have reported.

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: