The truth is Barack Obama is very qualified to be President without the baggage the Clintons bring to the table and the Clintons know it too.

Barack is a man of high moral integrity/courage, vast experience as a state legislator for 8 years and US senator since 2004, sound judgment on many issues and his desire for a working majority to move the country forward.

People please set your fears aside and take the time to learn about Barack Obama before it’s too late. Many are doing so, republicans, independents and democrats alike. Let’s not repeat our mistakes of the past, playing to politics of smear and fear. It tears us down and we pay dearly each time.

We’re talking about Hill not Bill. However, since you are so adamant about comparing and contrasting Bush and Bill - how about this:

“I don’t recall; President Clinton ever trampling or ignoring the Constitution, or thumbing his nose at statutory law, whereas with Bush & Co., that is standard operating procedure.—–Your kidding right - he was impeached for perjury remember - and thdere were lot’s of other things too.

“……Terry Schiavo” - Bill signed the Defense of Marriage act…not quite the same but still allowing the federal govt to stick it’s political nose into your private life.

Trust me when I tell you how well I know recent history, as well as not so recent history for that matter. I am always accurate, although I struggle with fairness for anything “Clinton” because history tells us that if you give any Clinton an inch they’ll take a mile - so “I think you would do well to review recent history and rethink this thing”.

And don’t forget these uncut hits too…..
Allowed the sale of advanced technology to China
Never did get Bin laden although he knew very well that he would kill Americans
The only sitting president ever to have been accused of rape
NAFTA
The Telecommunications Act of 1996
I could go on for quite some time about this - but it isn’t worth it because the Clintons are from the last century…..not this one-

So get off your high horse—-Bill Clinton was no saint, and Hillary isn ‘t either - and don’t forget that when it comes to Bill and Hill (Beavis and Butthead) co-dependency knows no bounds and you won’t get one without the other - and that’s the real danger, so don’t forget it.

“The Clintons do not believe you should be governing yourselves…..they believe they should be governing you, your behavior, your life.”

I don’t recall; President Clinton ever trampling or ignoring the Constitution, or thumbing his nose at statutory law, whereas with Bush & Co., that is standard operating procedure.

I don’t recall the Clintons perpetrating anything like what Republicans did in the tragic Terri Schiavo situation.

I think you would do well to review recent history and rethink this thing. I’m not trying to get you to support Hillary Clinton. For the reasons stated above, I’ve had it with her. I do think it’s important to be fair and accurate, however.

I believe the Obama campaign is different than anything we have seen because it has it’s roots in neighborhood grass roots organization. The labor movement is nothing like it once was…organized religion in the big cities doesn’t have the same “local” attachment that it once did….what will replace these 2 powerful local organizations? There isn’t anything, unless someone wants to invent it…..many people are hungry at a grass roots level for such a representative organization. Is the Obama campaign the beginnings of that “reach out” for a better society type of organization? I have no idea, but I do believe that any Clinton represents the polar opposite when it comes to “of the people, by the people, for the people” type of politics.

The Clintons do not believe you should be governing yourselves…..they believe they should be governing you, your behavior, your life. Do we really want to be told that pro war conservatives are in the best interest of the majority of Americans?