<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lawrence Lessig On Why He Supports Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/03/10/lawrence-lessig-on-why-he-supports-obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/10/lawrence-lessig-on-why-he-supports-obama/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:08:28 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ChrisO</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/10/lawrence-lessig-on-why-he-supports-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-393509</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/10/lawrence-lessig-on-why-he-supports-obama/#comment-393509</guid>
		<description>&quot;The only thing I do not understand is how any intelligent person could vote for Clinton in 2008 instead of Obama.&quot;

Boy, did you just capture Obama supporters in a nutshell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The only thing I do not understand is how any intelligent person could vote for Clinton in 2008 instead of Obama.&#8221;</p>
<p>Boy, did you just capture Obama supporters in a nutshell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/10/lawrence-lessig-on-why-he-supports-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-393506</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/10/lawrence-lessig-on-why-he-supports-obama/#comment-393506</guid>
		<description>Excellent.

The only thing I do not understand is how any intelligent person could vote for Clinton in 2008 instead of Obama.


Obama is 1000 times....   1,000,000 times...      infinitely preferable as President of the USA.

Remaining States: please vote for Obama!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent.</p>
<p>The only thing I do not understand is how any intelligent person could vote for Clinton in 2008 instead of Obama.</p>
<p>Obama is 1000 times&#8230;.   1,000,000 times&#8230;      infinitely preferable as President of the USA.</p>
<p>Remaining States: please vote for Obama!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kritter</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/10/lawrence-lessig-on-why-he-supports-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-393384</link>
		<dc:creator>kritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 04:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/10/lawrence-lessig-on-why-he-supports-obama/#comment-393384</guid>
		<description>I thought the technique of audio backed by printed buzzwords for emphasis was both creative and borderline propagandistic.

He weakens his presentation, at least in my eyes, by using demon terms like &quot;swiftboating&quot; and &quot;Rovean.&quot; He&#039;d be better off using more familiar terms that actually describe the tactics in ways anyone could understand, without the background context. This practice makes it easier for his lengthy work to be dismissed.

Additionally, unless he does it at the very end (I got thru about 3/4), he doesn&#039;t speak to whether the sort of fundamental change Obama describes is realistic. I&#039;ve reached the age where I know well just how deeply  &quot;fundamental reform&quot; warms the hearts of progressives. I&#039;m pretty agnostic on it myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the technique of audio backed by printed buzzwords for emphasis was both creative and borderline propagandistic.</p>
<p>He weakens his presentation, at least in my eyes, by using demon terms like &#8220;swiftboating&#8221; and &#8220;Rovean.&#8221; He&#8217;d be better off using more familiar terms that actually describe the tactics in ways anyone could understand, without the background context. This practice makes it easier for his lengthy work to be dismissed.</p>
<p>Additionally, unless he does it at the very end (I got thru about 3/4), he doesn&#8217;t speak to whether the sort of fundamental change Obama describes is realistic. I&#8217;ve reached the age where I know well just how deeply  &#8220;fundamental reform&#8221; warms the hearts of progressives. I&#8217;m pretty agnostic on it myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Chusid</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/10/lawrence-lessig-on-why-he-supports-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-393378</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Chusid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 04:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/10/lawrence-lessig-on-why-he-supports-obama/#comment-393378</guid>
		<description>It is an excellent video. I also have the transcript of the video posted here:

http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2852</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is an excellent video. I also have the transcript of the video posted here:</p>
<p><a href="http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2852" rel="nofollow">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2852</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swatty</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/10/lawrence-lessig-on-why-he-supports-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-393373</link>
		<dc:creator>Swatty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 03:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/10/lawrence-lessig-on-why-he-supports-obama/#comment-393373</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t get it loud enough to hear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t get it loud enough to hear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
