<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Sins</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/03/10/new-sins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/10/new-sins/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rich Horton</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/10/new-sins/#comment-393345</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Horton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/10/new-sins/#comment-393345</guid>
		<description>I guess I'm not sure what is new here, except maybe in giving certain sinful actions "brand names," so to speak.  Of course, I went to high school at a Catholic seminary where we got a bit more of the theology than your average Catholic gets, especially these days.  Maybe the Vatican brought in some consultants who found the new sins scored real high with their target demographic.

&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3f72CTDe4-0" rel="nofollow"&gt;Their head demographer thinks it all sounds swell.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I&#8217;m not sure what is new here, except maybe in giving certain sinful actions &#8220;brand names,&#8221; so to speak.  Of course, I went to high school at a Catholic seminary where we got a bit more of the theology than your average Catholic gets, especially these days.  Maybe the Vatican brought in some consultants who found the new sins scored real high with their target demographic.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3f72CTDe4-0" rel="nofollow">Their head demographer thinks it all sounds swell.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TerenceC</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/10/new-sins/#comment-393340</link>
		<dc:creator>TerenceC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/10/new-sins/#comment-393340</guid>
		<description>I can't think of another institution that has managed to survive for nearly 2000 years - mostly on donations - and to have had such an unbelievable impact on human history. You have to hand it to he Catholic Church - it is consistent with it's pro-life message. Fortunately they have all those buildings that were built long before the invention of electricity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t think of another institution that has managed to survive for nearly 2000 years - mostly on donations - and to have had such an unbelievable impact on human history. You have to hand it to he Catholic Church - it is consistent with it&#8217;s pro-life message. Fortunately they have all those buildings that were built long before the invention of electricity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kritter</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/10/new-sins/#comment-393335</link>
		<dc:creator>kritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/10/new-sins/#comment-393335</guid>
		<description>And I'm sure the church will think globally while also acting locally.

So  I guess it's safe to assume that the church will immediately desist with all that air-polluting incense burning. And I'm eagerly awaiting their guidance on alternatives to Christmas lights, since they'll obviously have to be right out. Unless  of course they're solar-powered. 

Boy the carbon footprint for the burning of Christmas lights is sure to be a big scandal come next December.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I&#8217;m sure the church will think globally while also acting locally.</p>
<p>So  I guess it&#8217;s safe to assume that the church will immediately desist with all that air-polluting incense burning. And I&#8217;m eagerly awaiting their guidance on alternatives to Christmas lights, since they&#8217;ll obviously have to be right out. Unless  of course they&#8217;re solar-powered. </p>
<p>Boy the carbon footprint for the burning of Christmas lights is sure to be a big scandal come next December.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.499 seconds -->
