<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michael Gerson: Partisan Hack</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/03/19/michael-gerson-partisan-hack/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/19/michael-gerson-partisan-hack/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:08:28 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kashif ali</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/19/michael-gerson-partisan-hack/comment-page-1/#comment-398625</link>
		<dc:creator>kashif ali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 12:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/19/michael-gerson-partisan-hack/#comment-398625</guid>
		<description>just a reminder to everyone here

mccain might not have a &quot;pastor&quot; for 20 years

but

mccain himself said &quot;i hate gooks&quot;

out of his own mouth

so its ok for the candidate mccain himself to be racist
but its not ok for obama&#039;s pastor to say some racist things.
not obama mind you, obama has never himself said anything close

but mccain... wow &quot;gooks&quot; &quot;tar babies&quot; obviously is against homosexuality and voted against the ability to fight for equal wages

sounds like a great leader for america</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just a reminder to everyone here</p>
<p>mccain might not have a &#8220;pastor&#8221; for 20 years</p>
<p>but</p>
<p>mccain himself said &#8220;i hate gooks&#8221;</p>
<p>out of his own mouth</p>
<p>so its ok for the candidate mccain himself to be racist<br />
but its not ok for obama&#8217;s pastor to say some racist things.<br />
not obama mind you, obama has never himself said anything close</p>
<p>but mccain&#8230; wow &#8220;gooks&#8221; &#8220;tar babies&#8221; obviously is against homosexuality and voted against the ability to fight for equal wages</p>
<p>sounds like a great leader for america</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Americaneocon</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/19/michael-gerson-partisan-hack/comment-page-1/#comment-394521</link>
		<dc:creator>Americaneocon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 02:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/19/michael-gerson-partisan-hack/#comment-394521</guid>
		<description>McCain not a member of an extremist church.

You&#039;re almost as bad as Wright!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain not a member of an extremist church.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re almost as bad as Wright!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/19/michael-gerson-partisan-hack/comment-page-1/#comment-394461</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/19/michael-gerson-partisan-hack/#comment-394461</guid>
		<description>One week the line is, &quot;Barack HUSSEIN Obama is a secret Muslim who fakes Christian belief as part of a plot to take over the country.&quot; The next week it&#039;s Gerson-style suggestions that &quot;Barack Obama has attended the same Christian church for 20 years, and is thus responsible for every statement of his pastor that he has not specifically repudiated &lt;i&gt;in the past&lt;/i&gt;, because present repudiations &lt;i&gt;don&#039;t count&lt;/i&gt;&quot; It would be easier to stomach this stuff if the anti-Obama attack machine were doing something apart from throwing mud to see what sticks.

&quot;none&quot;, falsely suggesting that McCain has only spent an hour, total, with his religious extremist supporters doesn&#039;t exactly inspire me to believe that you are interested in the facts. You&#039;re aware that Rod Parsley is McCain&#039;s &lt;i&gt;spiritual advisor&lt;/i&gt;, aren&#039;t you? Or don&#039;t you care? Hagee? That endorsement was actively solicited. McCain&#039;s been making overtures to him &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.talk2action.org/story/2007/2/23/9556/02805/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;for at least a year&lt;/a&gt;.

There is a difference, of course, with attending a church where the minister periodically says absurd and inflammatory things over the course of two decades, and actively soliciting the endorsement of an extremist minister whose record you know from day one. Who is of the type you have previously condemned as an &quot;agent of intolerance.&quot; In the former context, you may come to understand the minister as man and to appreciate his other teachings, even as you reject his extremism. In the latter case, you walk in with your eyes wide open. In the former case you may at some time feel you have to move on from your church, or you may decide that the minister&#039;s positive side and your participation in the church community outweigh the negative. In the latter case it&#039;s the minister&#039;s large fan base, a population that largely accepts and endorses the extremist message, that makes the minister attractive - and that&#039;s all you care about.

There is no indication that Wright was seeking to aggrandize himself, profit, or inject his views into public policy through his association with Obama. There&#039;s every indication that ministers like Robertson, Hagee and Parsley not only want that, they make it a prerequisite for their support.

Even if we hold the statements of Obama&#039;s minister equivalent with those of the likes of Hagee, Robertson and Parsley, by what measure wouldn&#039;t McCain&#039;s choices reflect far worse judgment than Obama&#039;s?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One week the line is, &#8220;Barack HUSSEIN Obama is a secret Muslim who fakes Christian belief as part of a plot to take over the country.&#8221; The next week it&#8217;s Gerson-style suggestions that &#8220;Barack Obama has attended the same Christian church for 20 years, and is thus responsible for every statement of his pastor that he has not specifically repudiated <i>in the past</i>, because present repudiations <i>don&#8217;t count</i>&#8221; It would be easier to stomach this stuff if the anti-Obama attack machine were doing something apart from throwing mud to see what sticks.</p>
<p>&#8220;none&#8221;, falsely suggesting that McCain has only spent an hour, total, with his religious extremist supporters doesn&#8217;t exactly inspire me to believe that you are interested in the facts. You&#8217;re aware that Rod Parsley is McCain&#8217;s <i>spiritual advisor</i>, aren&#8217;t you? Or don&#8217;t you care? Hagee? That endorsement was actively solicited. McCain&#8217;s been making overtures to him <a href="http://www.talk2action.org/story/2007/2/23/9556/02805/" rel="nofollow">for at least a year</a>.</p>
<p>There is a difference, of course, with attending a church where the minister periodically says absurd and inflammatory things over the course of two decades, and actively soliciting the endorsement of an extremist minister whose record you know from day one. Who is of the type you have previously condemned as an &#8220;agent of intolerance.&#8221; In the former context, you may come to understand the minister as man and to appreciate his other teachings, even as you reject his extremism. In the latter case, you walk in with your eyes wide open. In the former case you may at some time feel you have to move on from your church, or you may decide that the minister&#8217;s positive side and your participation in the church community outweigh the negative. In the latter case it&#8217;s the minister&#8217;s large fan base, a population that largely accepts and endorses the extremist message, that makes the minister attractive &#8211; and that&#8217;s all you care about.</p>
<p>There is no indication that Wright was seeking to aggrandize himself, profit, or inject his views into public policy through his association with Obama. There&#8217;s every indication that ministers like Robertson, Hagee and Parsley not only want that, they make it a prerequisite for their support.</p>
<p>Even if we hold the statements of Obama&#8217;s minister equivalent with those of the likes of Hagee, Robertson and Parsley, by what measure wouldn&#8217;t McCain&#8217;s choices reflect far worse judgment than Obama&#8217;s?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C Stanley</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/19/michael-gerson-partisan-hack/comment-page-1/#comment-394440</link>
		<dc:creator>C Stanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/19/michael-gerson-partisan-hack/#comment-394440</guid>
		<description>I also see in michael&#039;s argument the tendency to think of the Dems as the &#039;good guys&#039; who won&#039;t fall prey to the same foibles as the GOP. It&#039;s as though some think we don&#039;t have to worry about Democratic politicians pandering to, or closely associating with, black supremacists the same way we&#039;d worry about a white conservative doing the same with white supremacists, because, you know, wink, wink, we know that the Dems don&#039;t really buy into all of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also see in michael&#8217;s argument the tendency to think of the Dems as the &#8216;good guys&#8217; who won&#8217;t fall prey to the same foibles as the GOP. It&#8217;s as though some think we don&#8217;t have to worry about Democratic politicians pandering to, or closely associating with, black supremacists the same way we&#8217;d worry about a white conservative doing the same with white supremacists, because, you know, wink, wink, we know that the Dems don&#8217;t really buy into all of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C Stanley</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/19/michael-gerson-partisan-hack/comment-page-1/#comment-394439</link>
		<dc:creator>C Stanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/19/michael-gerson-partisan-hack/#comment-394439</guid>
		<description>michael, I&#039;d submit to you that what you are doing is excusing things on the Dem side in a way that will easily lead to the same problems you see in the GOP. Wright isn&#039;t influential? First off, he&#039;s more so than you admit- but even leaving that aside, Obama not only had a personal relationship but a political one (until last week, Wright was head of the religious outreach part of Obama&#039;s campaign.) So, do you want to hold your party accountable to make sure that the same cancer doesn&#039;t take root that you see in the GOP, or do you want to keep telling everyone that we&#039;re wrong to point out the problem here?

And same goes for black racism. The point isn&#039;t that there&#039;s some sort of equivalence between white on black vs. black on white racism, in terms of harm done. But what are you really saying? That until we equal the score we can&#039;t get over racism? No, the point is that racism doesn&#039;t cure racism- it has to stop, on both sides. If Obama and his supporters won&#039;t hold blacks accountable for that, then there&#039;s absolutely no way that we&#039;re ready for a postracist society.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>michael, I&#8217;d submit to you that what you are doing is excusing things on the Dem side in a way that will easily lead to the same problems you see in the GOP. Wright isn&#8217;t influential? First off, he&#8217;s more so than you admit- but even leaving that aside, Obama not only had a personal relationship but a political one (until last week, Wright was head of the religious outreach part of Obama&#8217;s campaign.) So, do you want to hold your party accountable to make sure that the same cancer doesn&#8217;t take root that you see in the GOP, or do you want to keep telling everyone that we&#8217;re wrong to point out the problem here?</p>
<p>And same goes for black racism. The point isn&#8217;t that there&#8217;s some sort of equivalence between white on black vs. black on white racism, in terms of harm done. But what are you really saying? That until we equal the score we can&#8217;t get over racism? No, the point is that racism doesn&#8217;t cure racism- it has to stop, on both sides. If Obama and his supporters won&#8217;t hold blacks accountable for that, then there&#8217;s absolutely no way that we&#8217;re ready for a postracist society.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phin</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/19/michael-gerson-partisan-hack/comment-page-1/#comment-394421</link>
		<dc:creator>phin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 05:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/19/michael-gerson-partisan-hack/#comment-394421</guid>
		<description>&quot;White racism caused millions of human beings to be held in slavery. It caused them to be whipped, shackled, worked to death. It caused children to be torn from the arms of their mothers. It allowed rape on a wide scale of women who could not defend themselves.&quot;

I don&#039;t know what history you think I&#039;m talking about, but whatever.  Of course white racism caused millions of human beings to be held in slavery.  Did I somehow argue otherwise?  I don&#039;t have a problem with history as it was, both ugly and at times good.  Human beings have been, over and over again, extremely nasty and brutal to each other, regardless of race, religion, tribe, nationality, etc I might add.  Nor will I pretend that it doesn&#039;t matter today..to an extent.  I should hasten to add that whites did a remarkable job throughout history in enslaving other whites as well.  Slavery was not solely a white-black affair.  The Greeks, Romans, Arabs, Persians come to mind, among many many others.  And the African slave trade would not have been so successful without the eager aid of Africans themselves btw.  

But you know what?  It wasn&#039;t me that enslaved millions of other human beings including blacks, other whites or miscellaneous.  The year is 2008.  From my perspective, the idea of judging another human being solely on the basis of his skin or any other characteristic determined by his genetic makeup is completely and utterly nonsensical and illogical, not to mention disgusting and vile.  It makes no friggin&#039; sense to judge someone on things (inherited physical characteristics for example) that they had absolutely no control over.  That includes their sexuality btw.  

Now if we are to say that indeed we are striving for a real post racial world, then every human being should be judged by the same standards,  by his/her actions, his/her words, his/her deeds regardless of race, gender, religion, color, etc.  And you don&#039;t do that by using one standard for whites, another standard for blacks, another standard for browns, another one for friggin red, blue and green people for all I care.

I don&#039;t friggin care that Obama is black.  I really don&#039;t, other than it would be really cool that an American who happens of black descent (and hopefully Hispanic,  Asian or whatever down the line) is running for POTUS and has a real chance to win.  It would be also cool if, sorry *when* that eventually happens in Canada, provided he/she deserves the job based on merit.

But I do care about what his policies are and I do think that his judgment, which he has made such an issue of, is even more important, given his very real inexperience, especially in governing.  And don&#039;t forget, if a Dem wins, he&#039;s likely to have a fully Dem Congress.  Given the disaster in the 6 years of full GOP governance and the disarray in the Dem primaries (which frankly should scare the crap out of anyone when these incompetents *try* to govern), a full Dem control of the government seems to me a disaster waiting to happen.  And that judgment, given his long association with Wright, has, I&#039;m sorry to say, been piss poor, at best.  And you know what, he does use race to his advantage, even though he and his supporters pretend he doesn&#039;t.  And I find that unseemly, especially as his campaign is supposed to be post-racial and post-partisan.  I call bullshit on that.

The fact remains that if he was white, and he had that kind of an association, he would be finished by now.  Period.  And God forbid if he was a conservative.  The media and the liberal establishment would be crucifying him until he became political poison...and then some  And you know what, rightly so.  But because he is black, and because the media love the narrative, he gets a pass, and liberals, who have been busy demonizing conservatives for over a generation at the slightest bit of racism (whether real or not and I might add regardless of the context or circumstances)  have been swooning all over him, marveling at his courage and bravery?!?!  Seriously!?!  It&#039;s a load of shit, reeks of identity politics and is actually condescending to blacks as a whole, holding them to a lower standard than you would whites.  It&#039;s the soft bigotry of low expectations.  Period.    

&quot;Racism, whether black or white is wrong. Period. But white racism was a centuries-long atrocity. Black racism is a tiny echo.&quot;

Human beings are human beings, regardless of race, religion, language, whatever.  At their core, blacks are no more or less racist than whites and vice-versa or anybody else for that matter.  The determining factor is power (which virtually all human beings crave, regardless of race, religion, color, nationality) to feed their ego, their &quot;immortality&quot;.  Self-preservation is at the core of every human being and the best way to enhance ones chances in life is through the achievement of power.  It just so happens that Europeans were far more successful in achieving and maintaining power (for any number of reasons) than most of their contemporaries.  The manner with which they did so appears barbaric to us, obviously, but that&#039;s relative within the context of their eras.  But, on the hole, they were no better and no worse than most of their contemporaries, only more successful.  And they happen to be Caucasians, and like virtually all of their contemporary human beings at various stages in their history, thought that their beliefs, their &quot;race&quot;, their religion, their &quot;tribes&quot;, their ideologies were superior to everyone else&#039;s (including between themselves; after all Europeans were most efficient in slaughtering their fellow Europeans).  Universal human rights are a relatively recent, modern and I might add Western phenomenon, obviously.  

So while black racism is an &quot;echo&quot; (primarily because blacks have never really been in a position of power relative to whites, historically, for any number of reasons), it doesn&#039;t diminish its potential damage, nor does it somehow make it any less contemptible, poisonous and morally reprehensible than white racism or racism of any kind for that matter.  Not too mention that the people it hurts the most are blacks themselves.

Sorry for the long post...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;White racism caused millions of human beings to be held in slavery. It caused them to be whipped, shackled, worked to death. It caused children to be torn from the arms of their mothers. It allowed rape on a wide scale of women who could not defend themselves.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what history you think I&#8217;m talking about, but whatever.  Of course white racism caused millions of human beings to be held in slavery.  Did I somehow argue otherwise?  I don&#8217;t have a problem with history as it was, both ugly and at times good.  Human beings have been, over and over again, extremely nasty and brutal to each other, regardless of race, religion, tribe, nationality, etc I might add.  Nor will I pretend that it doesn&#8217;t matter today..to an extent.  I should hasten to add that whites did a remarkable job throughout history in enslaving other whites as well.  Slavery was not solely a white-black affair.  The Greeks, Romans, Arabs, Persians come to mind, among many many others.  And the African slave trade would not have been so successful without the eager aid of Africans themselves btw.  </p>
<p>But you know what?  It wasn&#8217;t me that enslaved millions of other human beings including blacks, other whites or miscellaneous.  The year is 2008.  From my perspective, the idea of judging another human being solely on the basis of his skin or any other characteristic determined by his genetic makeup is completely and utterly nonsensical and illogical, not to mention disgusting and vile.  It makes no friggin&#8217; sense to judge someone on things (inherited physical characteristics for example) that they had absolutely no control over.  That includes their sexuality btw.  </p>
<p>Now if we are to say that indeed we are striving for a real post racial world, then every human being should be judged by the same standards,  by his/her actions, his/her words, his/her deeds regardless of race, gender, religion, color, etc.  And you don&#8217;t do that by using one standard for whites, another standard for blacks, another standard for browns, another one for friggin red, blue and green people for all I care.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t friggin care that Obama is black.  I really don&#8217;t, other than it would be really cool that an American who happens of black descent (and hopefully Hispanic,  Asian or whatever down the line) is running for POTUS and has a real chance to win.  It would be also cool if, sorry *when* that eventually happens in Canada, provided he/she deserves the job based on merit.</p>
<p>But I do care about what his policies are and I do think that his judgment, which he has made such an issue of, is even more important, given his very real inexperience, especially in governing.  And don&#8217;t forget, if a Dem wins, he&#8217;s likely to have a fully Dem Congress.  Given the disaster in the 6 years of full GOP governance and the disarray in the Dem primaries (which frankly should scare the crap out of anyone when these incompetents *try* to govern), a full Dem control of the government seems to me a disaster waiting to happen.  And that judgment, given his long association with Wright, has, I&#8217;m sorry to say, been piss poor, at best.  And you know what, he does use race to his advantage, even though he and his supporters pretend he doesn&#8217;t.  And I find that unseemly, especially as his campaign is supposed to be post-racial and post-partisan.  I call bullshit on that.</p>
<p>The fact remains that if he was white, and he had that kind of an association, he would be finished by now.  Period.  And God forbid if he was a conservative.  The media and the liberal establishment would be crucifying him until he became political poison&#8230;and then some  And you know what, rightly so.  But because he is black, and because the media love the narrative, he gets a pass, and liberals, who have been busy demonizing conservatives for over a generation at the slightest bit of racism (whether real or not and I might add regardless of the context or circumstances)  have been swooning all over him, marveling at his courage and bravery?!?!  Seriously!?!  It&#8217;s a load of shit, reeks of identity politics and is actually condescending to blacks as a whole, holding them to a lower standard than you would whites.  It&#8217;s the soft bigotry of low expectations.  Period.    </p>
<p>&#8220;Racism, whether black or white is wrong. Period. But white racism was a centuries-long atrocity. Black racism is a tiny echo.&#8221;</p>
<p>Human beings are human beings, regardless of race, religion, language, whatever.  At their core, blacks are no more or less racist than whites and vice-versa or anybody else for that matter.  The determining factor is power (which virtually all human beings crave, regardless of race, religion, color, nationality) to feed their ego, their &#8220;immortality&#8221;.  Self-preservation is at the core of every human being and the best way to enhance ones chances in life is through the achievement of power.  It just so happens that Europeans were far more successful in achieving and maintaining power (for any number of reasons) than most of their contemporaries.  The manner with which they did so appears barbaric to us, obviously, but that&#8217;s relative within the context of their eras.  But, on the hole, they were no better and no worse than most of their contemporaries, only more successful.  And they happen to be Caucasians, and like virtually all of their contemporary human beings at various stages in their history, thought that their beliefs, their &#8220;race&#8221;, their religion, their &#8220;tribes&#8221;, their ideologies were superior to everyone else&#8217;s (including between themselves; after all Europeans were most efficient in slaughtering their fellow Europeans).  Universal human rights are a relatively recent, modern and I might add Western phenomenon, obviously.  </p>
<p>So while black racism is an &#8220;echo&#8221; (primarily because blacks have never really been in a position of power relative to whites, historically, for any number of reasons), it doesn&#8217;t diminish its potential damage, nor does it somehow make it any less contemptible, poisonous and morally reprehensible than white racism or racism of any kind for that matter.  Not too mention that the people it hurts the most are blacks themselves.</p>
<p>Sorry for the long post&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim S</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/19/michael-gerson-partisan-hack/comment-page-1/#comment-394412</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 04:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/19/michael-gerson-partisan-hack/#comment-394412</guid>
		<description>none keeps trying to create a false argument, completely ignoring what people like Robertson and Dobson mean to the Republican Party, which McCain hopes to lead. He keeps mentioning one hour, ignoring the praise that McCain gives Hagee while (Gasp, shock!) not actually in the same room with him. McCain says once that he doesn&#039;t agree with all of Hagee&#039;s statements and doesn&#039;t have the fortitude to address anything concerning the two men in detail as Obama has. And if we&#039;re going to discuss judgment let&#039;s discuss McCain&#039;s unquestioning acceptance of the Iraq war and the claims concerning terrorism and Iraq. Now &lt;b&gt;that&#039;s&lt;/b&gt; a lack of judgment. Let&#039;s also discuss the claims that McCain makes that the most important thing we can do for the economy&#039;s current problems is to make Bush&#039;s tax cuts permanent and eliminate the estate tax. Anyone who thinks that any of those things shows good judgment has judgment issues of their own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>none keeps trying to create a false argument, completely ignoring what people like Robertson and Dobson mean to the Republican Party, which McCain hopes to lead. He keeps mentioning one hour, ignoring the praise that McCain gives Hagee while (Gasp, shock!) not actually in the same room with him. McCain says once that he doesn&#8217;t agree with all of Hagee&#8217;s statements and doesn&#8217;t have the fortitude to address anything concerning the two men in detail as Obama has. And if we&#8217;re going to discuss judgment let&#8217;s discuss McCain&#8217;s unquestioning acceptance of the Iraq war and the claims concerning terrorism and Iraq. Now <b>that&#8217;s</b> a lack of judgment. Let&#8217;s also discuss the claims that McCain makes that the most important thing we can do for the economy&#8217;s current problems is to make Bush&#8217;s tax cuts permanent and eliminate the estate tax. Anyone who thinks that any of those things shows good judgment has judgment issues of their own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: none</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/19/michael-gerson-partisan-hack/comment-page-1/#comment-394406</link>
		<dc:creator>none</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 03:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/19/michael-gerson-partisan-hack/#comment-394406</guid>
		<description>The 2008 Presidential candidates are Obama, McCain, and Clinton. I don&#039;t believe Robertson and Dobson are running.

Presidential candidates meet many people in the course of campaigning for an electorate of 300 million.

McCain met with Hagee and Parsley for 1 hour

Obama met with Wright for 20 years

Judgement, not religion</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 2008 Presidential candidates are Obama, McCain, and Clinton. I don&#8217;t believe Robertson and Dobson are running.</p>
<p>Presidential candidates meet many people in the course of campaigning for an electorate of 300 million.</p>
<p>McCain met with Hagee and Parsley for 1 hour</p>
<p>Obama met with Wright for 20 years</p>
<p>Judgement, not religion</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael reynolds</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/19/michael-gerson-partisan-hack/comment-page-1/#comment-394400</link>
		<dc:creator>michael reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/19/michael-gerson-partisan-hack/#comment-394400</guid>
		<description>Phin:
And I want to add one thing:  Gerson, as big a hack as he is, would be among the first to denounce your interpretation of history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phin:<br />
And I want to add one thing:  Gerson, as big a hack as he is, would be among the first to denounce your interpretation of history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael reynolds</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/19/michael-gerson-partisan-hack/comment-page-1/#comment-394399</link>
		<dc:creator>michael reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/19/michael-gerson-partisan-hack/#comment-394399</guid>
		<description>Phin:

White racism caused millions of human beings to be held in slavery.  It caused them to be whipped, shackled, worked to death.  It caused children to be torn from the arms of their mothers.  It allowed rape on a wide scale of women who could not defend themselves.

Black racism has thus far caused . . . what exactly?  Some discomfort?

Racism, whether black or white is wrong.  Period.  But white racism was a centuries-long atrocity.  Black racism is a tiny echo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phin:</p>
<p>White racism caused millions of human beings to be held in slavery.  It caused them to be whipped, shackled, worked to death.  It caused children to be torn from the arms of their mothers.  It allowed rape on a wide scale of women who could not defend themselves.</p>
<p>Black racism has thus far caused . . . what exactly?  Some discomfort?</p>
<p>Racism, whether black or white is wrong.  Period.  But white racism was a centuries-long atrocity.  Black racism is a tiny echo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phin</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/19/michael-gerson-partisan-hack/comment-page-1/#comment-394397</link>
		<dc:creator>phin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/19/michael-gerson-partisan-hack/#comment-394397</guid>
		<description>&quot;Wright is a fringe figure with no role in the Democratic party.&quot;

Yes, a fringe figure who happens to be a vile, anti-American, anti-Semitic, racist demagogue, who teeny tiny detail also happens to be Obama&#039;s chosen preacher/mentor for the past 20 years, a very influential figure per Obama himself.  No biggie.

Nothing to see here, move along.  Black racism ok, sorta (at the very least &quot;understandable&quot; dontcha know *wink, wink*)...white racism, especially coming from conservatives, The Greatest Evil In The History Of The Universe...off with their heads, no mercy.  

Gotta love liberal hypocrisy and double standards.  Liberal identity politics at their finest or worst. 

&quot;The Republican party is in hock to religious nuts. No equivalence at all.&quot;

Of course, because it&#039;s *known* that conservatives are racist at their core.  It&#039;s just a fact...as opposed to the innate goodness, love and brotherhood of liberals.

And you have the audacity to call Gershon a hack.  Pot meet kettle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wright is a fringe figure with no role in the Democratic party.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, a fringe figure who happens to be a vile, anti-American, anti-Semitic, racist demagogue, who teeny tiny detail also happens to be Obama&#8217;s chosen preacher/mentor for the past 20 years, a very influential figure per Obama himself.  No biggie.</p>
<p>Nothing to see here, move along.  Black racism ok, sorta (at the very least &#8220;understandable&#8221; dontcha know *wink, wink*)&#8230;white racism, especially coming from conservatives, The Greatest Evil In The History Of The Universe&#8230;off with their heads, no mercy.  </p>
<p>Gotta love liberal hypocrisy and double standards.  Liberal identity politics at their finest or worst. </p>
<p>&#8220;The Republican party is in hock to religious nuts. No equivalence at all.&#8221;</p>
<p>Of course, because it&#8217;s *known* that conservatives are racist at their core.  It&#8217;s just a fact&#8230;as opposed to the innate goodness, love and brotherhood of liberals.</p>
<p>And you have the audacity to call Gershon a hack.  Pot meet kettle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/19/michael-gerson-partisan-hack/comment-page-1/#comment-394396</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/19/michael-gerson-partisan-hack/#comment-394396</guid>
		<description>Pretty much everyone in the nation knows who Jerry Falwell is and what he stands for. Somebody... who was it again... once called him an &quot;agent of intolerance&quot; and decried Falwell and Pat Robertson as &quot;corrupting influences on religion and politics&quot;. ( http://www.iht.com/articles/2000/02/29/bush.2.t_9.php )

Now McCain&#039;s openly embraces the likes of John Hagee and Rod Parsley.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty much everyone in the nation knows who Jerry Falwell is and what he stands for. Somebody&#8230; who was it again&#8230; once called him an &#8220;agent of intolerance&#8221; and decried Falwell and Pat Robertson as &#8220;corrupting influences on religion and politics&#8221;. ( <a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/2000/02/29/bush.2.t_9.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.iht.com/articles/2000/02/29/bush.2.t_9.php</a> )</p>
<p>Now McCain&#8217;s openly embraces the likes of John Hagee and Rod Parsley.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael reynolds</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/19/michael-gerson-partisan-hack/comment-page-1/#comment-394390</link>
		<dc:creator>michael reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/19/michael-gerson-partisan-hack/#comment-394390</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right, there&#039;s no equivalence.  Wright is a fringe figure with no role in the Democratic party.  Robertson is a former GOP presidential candidate and he, Falwell (RIP) and Dobson are central to the GOP.

The Republican party is in hock to religious nuts.  No equivalence at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, there&#8217;s no equivalence.  Wright is a fringe figure with no role in the Democratic party.  Robertson is a former GOP presidential candidate and he, Falwell (RIP) and Dobson are central to the GOP.</p>
<p>The Republican party is in hock to religious nuts.  No equivalence at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: none</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/19/michael-gerson-partisan-hack/comment-page-1/#comment-394385</link>
		<dc:creator>none</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 22:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/19/michael-gerson-partisan-hack/#comment-394385</guid>
		<description>There is no Falwell/Robertson/Wright equivalence.

McCain met with Falwell/Robertson/Hagee etc for 1 hour.

Obama met with Wright for 20 years.

It is not a question of religion, but of judgement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no Falwell/Robertson/Wright equivalence.</p>
<p>McCain met with Falwell/Robertson/Hagee etc for 1 hour.</p>
<p>Obama met with Wright for 20 years.</p>
<p>It is not a question of religion, but of judgement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
