<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s Going On With Michigan&#8217;s Revote?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/03/19/whats-going-on-with-michigans-revote/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/19/whats-going-on-with-michigans-revote/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: gerryf</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/19/whats-going-on-with-michigans-revote/#comment-394441</link>
		<dc:creator>gerryf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/19/whats-going-on-with-michigans-revote/#comment-394441</guid>
		<description>Whether or not a redo should occur is a debate for another time...but here's my question--why should either Hilary or Obama get to approve or dispapprove a new primary.

They have the right to participate or not, but if Michigan and Florida come up with a plan that is acceptable to the DNC, then the candidates should only get to say if they are in or out.

As far as the DNC is concerned the primary never occured, so whatever occurred  in the past primary doesn't give either candidate veto power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether or not a redo should occur is a debate for another time&#8230;but here&#8217;s my question&#8211;why should either Hilary or Obama get to approve or dispapprove a new primary.</p>
<p>They have the right to participate or not, but if Michigan and Florida come up with a plan that is acceptable to the DNC, then the candidates should only get to say if they are in or out.</p>
<p>As far as the DNC is concerned the primary never occured, so whatever occurred  in the past primary doesn&#8217;t give either candidate veto power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.259 seconds -->
