Comments on: Richardson Endorses Obama http://donklephant.com/2008/03/21/4974/ Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable. Tue, 14 Feb 2012 03:59:13 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: SFG http://donklephant.com/2008/03/21/4974/comment-page-1/#comment-394586 SFG Fri, 21 Mar 2008 21:04:54 +0000 http://donklephant.com/2008/03/21/4974/#comment-394586 Obama has no credibility. He initially went on the record stating he had not heard the offensive statements by pastor Wright. He stated he "knew about one of them". During his "historic speech" he admits that indeed he did heard these "controversial" comments by Rev. Wright. I always knew something was not quite wright when someone does not take PAC money just as he announces to run for president. What a political savy move by Axel Rod but it won't work. Obama is a typical polticial who took thousands from special interests like the pharmeceutical companies and nuclear industry. To make matters worse, he introduced legislation that was appealing to these special interests. Axel Rod, not everyone drank the Obama cool-aid (except for the "educated" latte drinking liberals) Thats right, despite the media's efforts to turn your candidate into a saint not everyone fell for it. John Edwards should have been our nominee. He NEVER took PAC money. And for all you Obama followers no matter how you try to spin the Pastor's comments, they were at the very least divisive and anti-American. One more thing: BILL RICHARDSON IS A JUDAS! Obama has no credibility. He initially went on the record stating he had not heard the offensive statements by pastor Wright. He stated he “knew about one of them”. During his “historic speech” he admits that indeed he did heard these “controversial” comments by Rev. Wright.

I always knew something was not quite wright when someone does not take PAC money just as he announces to run for president. What a political savy move by Axel Rod but it won’t work. Obama is a typical polticial who took thousands from special interests like the pharmeceutical companies and nuclear industry. To make matters worse, he introduced legislation that was appealing to these special interests.

Axel Rod, not everyone drank the Obama cool-aid (except for the “educated” latte drinking liberals) Thats right, despite
the media’s efforts to turn your candidate into a saint not everyone fell for it.
John Edwards should have been our nominee. He NEVER took PAC money.
And for all you Obama followers no matter how you try to spin the Pastor’s comments, they were at the very least divisive and anti-American.

One more thing: BILL RICHARDSON IS A JUDAS!

]]> By: philip kagan http://donklephant.com/2008/03/21/4974/comment-page-1/#comment-394583 philip kagan Fri, 21 Mar 2008 19:59:30 +0000 http://donklephant.com/2008/03/21/4974/#comment-394583 It seems coincidental that with obama being hit from all sides who question - who is obama? in re: Rev. Wright, hamas supporter malley, "this is the first day of my life that i am proud to be an american, and God knows what is coming down the pike, that Gov. Richardson makes his endorsement. Is he Obama's white (no pun intended) knight? And what can he expect as recompense? It seems coincidental that with obama being hit from all sides who question – who is obama? in re: Rev. Wright, hamas supporter malley, “this is the first day of my life that i am proud to be an american, and God knows what is coming down the pike, that Gov. Richardson makes his endorsement. Is he Obama’s white (no pun intended) knight? And what can he expect as recompense?

]]> By: wj http://donklephant.com/2008/03/21/4974/comment-page-1/#comment-394578 wj Fri, 21 Mar 2008 18:16:46 +0000 http://donklephant.com/2008/03/21/4974/#comment-394578 Maybe he just, you know, decided that Obama would make a better President? Radical reason for an endorsement, of course. But it might happen. Not every endorsement is the result of a job/favor promise. Maybe he just, you know, decided that Obama would make a better President? Radical reason for an endorsement, of course. But it might happen. Not every endorsement is the result of a job/favor promise.

]]> By: realist http://donklephant.com/2008/03/21/4974/comment-page-1/#comment-394573 realist Fri, 21 Mar 2008 17:18:28 +0000 http://donklephant.com/2008/03/21/4974/#comment-394573 i donno why hes endorsing the black guy. Hilarry-Richardson is more plausible. two minorities.. hmm. But obama might need him to get the hispanic vote, also kind of ruins his Libertarian-democrat credentials with the now increasingly lefty obama. But obama might see the fiscal conservativeness as a positive. who knows these things.. no one. i donno why hes endorsing the black guy. Hilarry-Richardson is more plausible. two minorities.. hmm. But obama might need him to get the hispanic vote, also kind of ruins his Libertarian-democrat credentials with the now increasingly lefty obama. But obama might see the fiscal conservativeness as a positive. who knows these things.. no one.

]]>