<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New, New, New Metric For Hillary Victory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/03/24/the-new-new-metric-for-hillary-victory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/24/the-new-new-metric-for-hillary-victory/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:03:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck C</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/24/the-new-new-metric-for-hillary-victory/comment-page-2/#comment-395033</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/24/the-new-new-metric-for-hillary-victory/#comment-395033</guid>
		<description>TC

A Republican goat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TC</p>
<p>A Republican goat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TerenceC</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/24/the-new-new-metric-for-hillary-victory/comment-page-2/#comment-395023</link>
		<dc:creator>TerenceC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/24/the-new-new-metric-for-hillary-victory/#comment-395023</guid>
		<description>What type of goat?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What type of goat?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck C</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/24/the-new-new-metric-for-hillary-victory/comment-page-2/#comment-395000</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 03:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/24/the-new-new-metric-for-hillary-victory/#comment-395000</guid>
		<description>TC

Does it count if he&#039;s caught with a goat? Because I&#039;ve heard rumors.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TC</p>
<p>Does it count if he&#8217;s caught with a goat? Because I&#8217;ve heard rumors&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mw</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/24/the-new-new-metric-for-hillary-victory/comment-page-2/#comment-394998</link>
		<dc:creator>mw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 03:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/24/the-new-new-metric-for-hillary-victory/#comment-394998</guid>
		<description>Chuck C,
I hear you. They are getting pretty strident. Almost like they are getting worried about something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chuck C,<br />
I hear you. They are getting pretty strident. Almost like they are getting worried about something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TerenceC</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/24/the-new-new-metric-for-hillary-victory/comment-page-2/#comment-394996</link>
		<dc:creator>TerenceC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 02:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/24/the-new-new-metric-for-hillary-victory/#comment-394996</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s over - get used to it. She lost but just hasn&#039;t had time to sing with her dodging bullets, swords, knights and their pikes, and of course sarcasm and what not. As one of her supporters you should be royally pissed she and her seven dwarves screwed up such a sure thing. The goal posts haven&#039;t moved - maybe you&#039;re just seeing them clearly finally. She&#039;ll win PA, lose NC, and trade victories back and forth until June - netting nothing and damaging the process for the Dem&#039;s. Despite her ridiclous insistence, it&#039;s still over - and she still loses. Short of Obama being caught with &quot;a live boy or a dead woman&quot; - she&#039;s done - now get that fork ready, maybe you can use it to eat that crow JG&#039;s getting ready to serve up for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s over &#8211; get used to it. She lost but just hasn&#8217;t had time to sing with her dodging bullets, swords, knights and their pikes, and of course sarcasm and what not. As one of her supporters you should be royally pissed she and her seven dwarves screwed up such a sure thing. The goal posts haven&#8217;t moved &#8211; maybe you&#8217;re just seeing them clearly finally. She&#8217;ll win PA, lose NC, and trade victories back and forth until June &#8211; netting nothing and damaging the process for the Dem&#8217;s. Despite her ridiclous insistence, it&#8217;s still over &#8211; and she still loses. Short of Obama being caught with &#8220;a live boy or a dead woman&#8221; &#8211; she&#8217;s done &#8211; now get that fork ready, maybe you can use it to eat that crow JG&#8217;s getting ready to serve up for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck C</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/24/the-new-new-metric-for-hillary-victory/comment-page-2/#comment-394988</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 02:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/24/the-new-new-metric-for-hillary-victory/#comment-394988</guid>
		<description>MW

Not long ago Obama supporters were wringing their hands saying if Clinton didn&#039;t drop out of the race the sky would fall. Now twenty-two percent of Democrats want him to drop out and eighty-five percent think it&#039;s going to be deceided by super delegates, and the sky is sill there. I think we&#039;re starting to see some buyer&#039;s remorse with Obama or his supporters are just getting used to the idea that she&#039;s going to take the nomination from him. Who knows, in a couple of weeks maybe we can count on their support for Clinton.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MW</p>
<p>Not long ago Obama supporters were wringing their hands saying if Clinton didn&#8217;t drop out of the race the sky would fall. Now twenty-two percent of Democrats want him to drop out and eighty-five percent think it&#8217;s going to be deceided by super delegates, and the sky is sill there. I think we&#8217;re starting to see some buyer&#8217;s remorse with Obama or his supporters are just getting used to the idea that she&#8217;s going to take the nomination from him. Who knows, in a couple of weeks maybe we can count on their support for Clinton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mw</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/24/the-new-new-metric-for-hillary-victory/comment-page-2/#comment-394949</link>
		<dc:creator>mw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 16:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/24/the-new-new-metric-for-hillary-victory/#comment-394949</guid>
		<description>TC - I see goal posts moving.

BTW - Obama winning more delegates than Clinton in states that she won the Primary (like TX) just proves what a travesty the caucus process is and how undemocratic the pledged delegates are. The will of the people was thwarted by Obama and his supporters in Tx (and MI and FL and...). I can only hope that the superdelegates understand that they need to  restore some integrity to this process, side with the will of the people and vote to overturn the pledged delegates. The will of the people demand it. Otherwise the will of the people may become disgusted with the Democrats and  turn against them in November. Fortunately we have a real fighter with Clinton, who will keep fighting hard for the will of the people.  She is the one hope for the will of the people to be recognized in the democratic party process, and with such an important principle at stake (the will of the people), the right thing for her to do is keep fighting and scrambling to the bitter end to defend the will of the people. I am really surprised to find Obama and his supporters to be so undemocratic and opposed to the will of the people. Its shocking really. 

JG - Current odds on Intrade are 5-1.  Nothing is going to happen to change the dynamic of this race until PA, and I hate to take advantage of you with those odds. Maybe Clinton will get a bit of a bump when she mops the floor with him in the debate again - that might improve the odds. 

I think a wager should be blog related in some way. Maybe a directed post where the winner directs the loser to write a post on a specific subject and also specifies which side to take. For example I might ask you to write a post defending the use of superdelegates in the Democratic Party nomination process. At current odds you would have to risk five directed posts to my one. What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TC &#8211; I see goal posts moving.</p>
<p>BTW &#8211; Obama winning more delegates than Clinton in states that she won the Primary (like TX) just proves what a travesty the caucus process is and how undemocratic the pledged delegates are. The will of the people was thwarted by Obama and his supporters in Tx (and MI and FL and&#8230;). I can only hope that the superdelegates understand that they need to  restore some integrity to this process, side with the will of the people and vote to overturn the pledged delegates. The will of the people demand it. Otherwise the will of the people may become disgusted with the Democrats and  turn against them in November. Fortunately we have a real fighter with Clinton, who will keep fighting hard for the will of the people.  She is the one hope for the will of the people to be recognized in the democratic party process, and with such an important principle at stake (the will of the people), the right thing for her to do is keep fighting and scrambling to the bitter end to defend the will of the people. I am really surprised to find Obama and his supporters to be so undemocratic and opposed to the will of the people. Its shocking really. </p>
<p>JG &#8211; Current odds on Intrade are 5-1.  Nothing is going to happen to change the dynamic of this race until PA, and I hate to take advantage of you with those odds. Maybe Clinton will get a bit of a bump when she mops the floor with him in the debate again &#8211; that might improve the odds. </p>
<p>I think a wager should be blog related in some way. Maybe a directed post where the winner directs the loser to write a post on a specific subject and also specifies which side to take. For example I might ask you to write a post defending the use of superdelegates in the Democratic Party nomination process. At current odds you would have to risk five directed posts to my one. What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TerenceC</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/24/the-new-new-metric-for-hillary-victory/comment-page-2/#comment-394924</link>
		<dc:creator>TerenceC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/24/the-new-new-metric-for-hillary-victory/#comment-394924</guid>
		<description>Well WM,  Clinton lost in delegates in NH and TX, and OH is currently involved in investigations of voter fraud - so your little &quot;fork thing&quot; indicates something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well WM,  Clinton lost in delegates in NH and TX, and OH is currently involved in investigations of voter fraud &#8211; so your little &#8220;fork thing&#8221; indicates something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Gardner</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/24/the-new-new-metric-for-hillary-victory/comment-page-1/#comment-394906</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 02:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/24/the-new-new-metric-for-hillary-victory/#comment-394906</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Ok. You drop the â€œwill of the peopleâ€ canard as it relates to pledged delegates, and Iâ€™ll drop the â€œfighterâ€ meme. Deal?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Actually, I was talking to Chuck. So I&#039;m not dropping anything. Sorry. :-)

However, I will place a wager that Obama gets the nomination. What are you in for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Ok. You drop the â€œwill of the peopleâ€ canard as it relates to pledged delegates, and Iâ€™ll drop the â€œfighterâ€ meme. Deal?</p></blockquote>
<p>Actually, I was talking to Chuck. So I&#8217;m not dropping anything. Sorry. :-)</p>
<p>However, I will place a wager that Obama gets the nomination. What are you in for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mw</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/24/the-new-new-metric-for-hillary-victory/comment-page-1/#comment-394904</link>
		<dc:creator>mw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/24/the-new-new-metric-for-hillary-victory/#comment-394904</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;&quot;Stick a fork in herâ€¦â€¦â€¦itâ€™s over.&quot;&lt;/i&gt; - tc&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Heh. You know, the most reliable metric I have found to be an indicator of an impending Clinton win, is when I start seeing Obama supporters using the phrase &lt;i&gt;&quot;stick a fork in her&quot;&lt;/i&gt;. The last two times this happened was immediately before New Hampshire and immediately before Ohio/Texas. 

Really. I noted the phenomena in &lt;a href=&quot;http://donklephant.com/2008/02/25/is-the-clinton-campaign-undead/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; this post&lt;/a&gt;

If I see this two or three more times, I&#039;ll know it is a lock for Clinton.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><i>&#8220;Stick a fork in herâ€¦â€¦â€¦itâ€™s over.&#8221;</i> &#8211; tc</p></blockquote>
<p>Heh. You know, the most reliable metric I have found to be an indicator of an impending Clinton win, is when I start seeing Obama supporters using the phrase <i>&#8220;stick a fork in her&#8221;</i>. The last two times this happened was immediately before New Hampshire and immediately before Ohio/Texas. </p>
<p>Really. I noted the phenomena in <a href="http://donklephant.com/2008/02/25/is-the-clinton-campaign-undead/" > this post</a></p>
<p>If I see this two or three more times, I&#8217;ll know it is a lock for Clinton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnnaL-G</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/24/the-new-new-metric-for-hillary-victory/comment-page-1/#comment-394850</link>
		<dc:creator>AnnaL-G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 13:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/24/the-new-new-metric-for-hillary-victory/#comment-394850</guid>
		<description>More like Hillary the spurned wife. Is it just me, or is this the first time anyone&#039;s dared bring up Bill&#039;s Lewinsky debacle up in reference to the present political climate - asking if he&#039;s the &quot;biggest pig?&quot;: http://www.wowowow.com/poll/who-biggest-pig</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More like Hillary the spurned wife. Is it just me, or is this the first time anyone&#8217;s dared bring up Bill&#8217;s Lewinsky debacle up in reference to the present political climate &#8211; asking if he&#8217;s the &#8220;biggest pig?&#8221;: <a href="http://www.wowowow.com/poll/who-biggest-pig" >http://www.wowowow.com/poll/who-biggest-pig</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TerenceC</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/24/the-new-new-metric-for-hillary-victory/comment-page-1/#comment-394845</link>
		<dc:creator>TerenceC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 10:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/24/the-new-new-metric-for-hillary-victory/#comment-394845</guid>
		<description>Hillary....the war hero, the stateswoman, the legislator? OK that was unfair......she has been losing, will continue to lose  overall, and doesn&#039;t have the structure to win now or in Nov.  Stick a fork in her.........it&#039;s over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary&#8230;.the war hero, the stateswoman, the legislator? OK that was unfair&#8230;&#8230;she has been losing, will continue to lose  overall, and doesn&#8217;t have the structure to win now or in Nov.  Stick a fork in her&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;it&#8217;s over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mw</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/24/the-new-new-metric-for-hillary-victory/comment-page-1/#comment-394841</link>
		<dc:creator>mw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 04:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/24/the-new-new-metric-for-hillary-victory/#comment-394841</guid>
		<description>Ok. You drop the &quot;will of the people&quot; canard as it relates to pledged delegates, and I&#039;ll drop the &quot;fighter&quot; meme. Deal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok. You drop the &#8220;will of the people&#8221; canard as it relates to pledged delegates, and I&#8217;ll drop the &#8220;fighter&#8221; meme. Deal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Gardner</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/24/the-new-new-metric-for-hillary-victory/comment-page-1/#comment-394837</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 03:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/24/the-new-new-metric-for-hillary-victory/#comment-394837</guid>
		<description>Hey, all fair points on the superdelegates. We&#039;re strenuously agreeing. :-)

As far as &quot;fighters&quot; go, I&#039;ve been extremely impressed with both candidates&#039; tenacity in this race. But just because Hillary is behind doesn&#039;t mean she&#039;s a better fighter. Obama has quickly and efficiently responded to attack after attack in this campaign and has never backed down. So let&#039;s drop the hacky &quot;fighter&quot; meme, shall we?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, all fair points on the superdelegates. We&#8217;re strenuously agreeing. :-)</p>
<p>As far as &#8220;fighters&#8221; go, I&#8217;ve been extremely impressed with both candidates&#8217; tenacity in this race. But just because Hillary is behind doesn&#8217;t mean she&#8217;s a better fighter. Obama has quickly and efficiently responded to attack after attack in this campaign and has never backed down. So let&#8217;s drop the hacky &#8220;fighter&#8221; meme, shall we?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck C</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/24/the-new-new-metric-for-hillary-victory/comment-page-1/#comment-394836</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 02:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/24/the-new-new-metric-for-hillary-victory/#comment-394836</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s going to be sticky either way. If things stay as close as they are nobody is going to drop out. So hang on Obama. You&#039;re in for a ride. Seems like Obama fears this, Clinton says &quot;bring it on&quot;. His stand is that it will disenfranchise voters. So be it. It doesn&#039;t seem to bother him that Florida and Michigan voters are disenfranchised. Oh, that&#039;s right, we&#039;re just following the rules. Well, the rules say the super delegates are the tie breaker. When the first ballot is over and there is no winner than it&#039;s center stage for them.
When it come to flight or fight, I&#039;ll take the fighter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s going to be sticky either way. If things stay as close as they are nobody is going to drop out. So hang on Obama. You&#8217;re in for a ride. Seems like Obama fears this, Clinton says &#8220;bring it on&#8221;. His stand is that it will disenfranchise voters. So be it. It doesn&#8217;t seem to bother him that Florida and Michigan voters are disenfranchised. Oh, that&#8217;s right, we&#8217;re just following the rules. Well, the rules say the super delegates are the tie breaker. When the first ballot is over and there is no winner than it&#8217;s center stage for them.<br />
When it come to flight or fight, I&#8217;ll take the fighter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Gardner</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/24/the-new-new-metric-for-hillary-victory/comment-page-1/#comment-394835</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 01:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/24/the-new-new-metric-for-hillary-victory/#comment-394835</guid>
		<description>Obamamania is a right-wing troll. Ignore it.

Chuck, that&#039;s correct, but the superdelegates have to decide if they want to overturn the will of the people. If they do, it&#039;ll be sticky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obamamania is a right-wing troll. Ignore it.</p>
<p>Chuck, that&#8217;s correct, but the superdelegates have to decide if they want to overturn the will of the people. If they do, it&#8217;ll be sticky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck C</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/24/the-new-new-metric-for-hillary-victory/comment-page-1/#comment-394831</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 00:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/24/the-new-new-metric-for-hillary-victory/#comment-394831</guid>
		<description>Justin,

Both you and I know that if Obama wins it&#039;s because of the super delegates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justin,</p>
<p>Both you and I know that if Obama wins it&#8217;s because of the super delegates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mw</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/24/the-new-new-metric-for-hillary-victory/comment-page-1/#comment-394830</link>
		<dc:creator>mw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 00:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/24/the-new-new-metric-for-hillary-victory/#comment-394830</guid>
		<description>I have no sour grapes about the rules. It is Obama supporters that are always whining about superdelegates deciding this, which are - in fact - the rules of the game that everyone agreed to. The problem with Obama supporters is that there are some rules that they like, even if it disenfranchises voters, and other rules they don&#039;t like, because that is how Clinton is going to win. 

It is simply a false statement that Clinton can&#039;t win.  Playing exactly by the rules of the Dem nomination process, If she continues to fight hard, I think it is likely, even probable that she will win. She owes it to her supporters (of which every poll shows there are as many as Obama supporters), to fight as hard as she can for the nomination.   

Obama has failed to deliver a knockout blow even outspending her 4-1 and having all the momentum going into TX and OH. I think he very well  may have already peaked, and is on a slow downward slide now.  She does better than him in every debate, and there are two more coming up. 

The only way  to reply to this abject nonsense that Clinton should stop trying to win the nomination, because &quot;the Democratc party suffers&quot; is to just flip the names and play it back:

So TerrenceC:
Barack hurts everyone the longer he staysâ€¦..and he couldnâ€™t care less if the Democratic party suffers because of it.

Get over it. It is still a very real contest. May the best woman win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no sour grapes about the rules. It is Obama supporters that are always whining about superdelegates deciding this, which are &#8211; in fact &#8211; the rules of the game that everyone agreed to. The problem with Obama supporters is that there are some rules that they like, even if it disenfranchises voters, and other rules they don&#8217;t like, because that is how Clinton is going to win. </p>
<p>It is simply a false statement that Clinton can&#8217;t win.  Playing exactly by the rules of the Dem nomination process, If she continues to fight hard, I think it is likely, even probable that she will win. She owes it to her supporters (of which every poll shows there are as many as Obama supporters), to fight as hard as she can for the nomination.   </p>
<p>Obama has failed to deliver a knockout blow even outspending her 4-1 and having all the momentum going into TX and OH. I think he very well  may have already peaked, and is on a slow downward slide now.  She does better than him in every debate, and there are two more coming up. </p>
<p>The only way  to reply to this abject nonsense that Clinton should stop trying to win the nomination, because &#8220;the Democratc party suffers&#8221; is to just flip the names and play it back:</p>
<p>So TerrenceC:<br />
Barack hurts everyone the longer he staysâ€¦..and he couldnâ€™t care less if the Democratic party suffers because of it.</p>
<p>Get over it. It is still a very real contest. May the best woman win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TerenceC</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/24/the-new-new-metric-for-hillary-victory/comment-page-1/#comment-394829</link>
		<dc:creator>TerenceC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 23:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/24/the-new-new-metric-for-hillary-victory/#comment-394829</guid>
		<description>Mr Cheadle


&quot;If the delegate count was reversed would they be screaming for Obama to quit. Hell, no. So itâ€™s in the interests of their canidate that they want Clinton to quit. Not that they give a damn about the Democratic Party. What hypocrisy.&quot;

If the delegate count were reversed virtually everyone would be asking for Obama to step down - Clinton, the Media, both right and left wing news, everyone - and you know what........he&#039;d do it.  It is because who her husband is, and what the Clinton&#039;s are in the Dem party that she is still considered active in this race - no other reason. The facts are right before us. She can&#039;t win on any matrices....she lost, and it&#039;s her fault. 

The longer the loser stays in and launches attacks at her primary opponent the greater the chances the opposition going unchallenged will win. I didn&#039;t write these Primary/caucus rules....I didn&#039;t agree to these rules.....I didn&#039;t even know about most of these rules - but the people involved all did, and they all agreed. Sour grapes and revisionist history won&#039;t cut it - she needs to go quickly and quietly.  Game over...she and her seven dwarves team took it all for granted........it&#039;s endemic of America actually - arrogance, hubris, the big fall, then all the dust up as her team of cartoon characters point fingers and try and shift blame figuring out what the hell just happened. 

There must be a good line from Casablanca that would wrap this up properly for Hillary -- how about this exchange

Hill: You understand how I feel. How long was it we had Bill?
Bill: (Bill on the verge of tears) I didn&#039;t count the days.
Hill: Well, I did. Every one of &#039;em. Mostly I remember the last one. The wild finish. A lady standing on a station platform in the rain with a comical look in her face because her insides have been kicked out. (remembering super Tuesday and having &quot;it&quot; handed to her in Wisconsin)

Hillary hurts everyone the longer she stays.....and she&#039;s couldn&#039;t care less if the Democratic party suffers because of it. President McCain and Vice President Clinton - what&#039;s next?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr Cheadle</p>
<p>&#8220;If the delegate count was reversed would they be screaming for Obama to quit. Hell, no. So itâ€™s in the interests of their canidate that they want Clinton to quit. Not that they give a damn about the Democratic Party. What hypocrisy.&#8221;</p>
<p>If the delegate count were reversed virtually everyone would be asking for Obama to step down &#8211; Clinton, the Media, both right and left wing news, everyone &#8211; and you know what&#8230;&#8230;..he&#8217;d do it.  It is because who her husband is, and what the Clinton&#8217;s are in the Dem party that she is still considered active in this race &#8211; no other reason. The facts are right before us. She can&#8217;t win on any matrices&#8230;.she lost, and it&#8217;s her fault. </p>
<p>The longer the loser stays in and launches attacks at her primary opponent the greater the chances the opposition going unchallenged will win. I didn&#8217;t write these Primary/caucus rules&#8230;.I didn&#8217;t agree to these rules&#8230;..I didn&#8217;t even know about most of these rules &#8211; but the people involved all did, and they all agreed. Sour grapes and revisionist history won&#8217;t cut it &#8211; she needs to go quickly and quietly.  Game over&#8230;she and her seven dwarves team took it all for granted&#8230;&#8230;..it&#8217;s endemic of America actually &#8211; arrogance, hubris, the big fall, then all the dust up as her team of cartoon characters point fingers and try and shift blame figuring out what the hell just happened. </p>
<p>There must be a good line from Casablanca that would wrap this up properly for Hillary &#8212; how about this exchange</p>
<p>Hill: You understand how I feel. How long was it we had Bill?<br />
Bill: (Bill on the verge of tears) I didn&#8217;t count the days.<br />
Hill: Well, I did. Every one of &#8216;em. Mostly I remember the last one. The wild finish. A lady standing on a station platform in the rain with a comical look in her face because her insides have been kicked out. (remembering super Tuesday and having &#8220;it&#8221; handed to her in Wisconsin)</p>
<p>Hillary hurts everyone the longer she stays&#8230;..and she&#8217;s couldn&#8217;t care less if the Democratic party suffers because of it. President McCain and Vice President Clinton &#8211; what&#8217;s next?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Cheadle</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/03/24/the-new-new-metric-for-hillary-victory/comment-page-1/#comment-394827</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Cheadle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 22:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2008/03/24/the-new-new-metric-for-hillary-victory/#comment-394827</guid>
		<description>TerenceC

You bet Clinton is trying to wreck Obama&#039;s chances in 2008. Isn&#039;t he trying to wreck her chances. Don&#039;t canidates try to win elections over opponents? 
50% of Democrats disagree with you and think Hilary would make the best canidate.
One theme I&#039;ve noticed among Obama followers is that they fear the primaries running their course. They want to quit while they&#039;re ahead. If the delegate count was reversed would they be screaming for Obama to quit. Hell, no. So it&#039;s in the interests of their canidate that they want Clinton to quit. Not that they give a damn about the Democratic Party. What hypocrisy.
They say you can&#039;t judge a book by it&#039;s cover. That&#039;s true. A lot of Obama followers judged him before they opened the book and looked at the pages. Turns out it was a work or fiction.

A question for Obamaites. What do you think of reparations?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TerenceC</p>
<p>You bet Clinton is trying to wreck Obama&#8217;s chances in 2008. Isn&#8217;t he trying to wreck her chances. Don&#8217;t canidates try to win elections over opponents?<br />
50% of Democrats disagree with you and think Hilary would make the best canidate.<br />
One theme I&#8217;ve noticed among Obama followers is that they fear the primaries running their course. They want to quit while they&#8217;re ahead. If the delegate count was reversed would they be screaming for Obama to quit. Hell, no. So it&#8217;s in the interests of their canidate that they want Clinton to quit. Not that they give a damn about the Democratic Party. What hypocrisy.<br />
They say you can&#8217;t judge a book by it&#8217;s cover. That&#8217;s true. A lot of Obama followers judged him before they opened the book and looked at the pages. Turns out it was a work or fiction.</p>
<p>A question for Obamaites. What do you think of reparations?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

