<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video: Bill Clinton Says Democratic Primary System Not Fair</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/04/21/video-bill-clinton-says-democratic-primary-system-not-fair/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/04/21/video-bill-clinton-says-democratic-primary-system-not-fair/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 10:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rich Horton</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/04/21/video-bill-clinton-says-democratic-primary-system-not-fair/#comment-396788</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Horton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5302#comment-396788</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I prefer to think instead that in such a hypothetical situation Obama could still have worked within different rules to still be in the lead.&lt;/i&gt;

So Obama wasn't &lt;i&gt;trying&lt;/i&gt; to win New York, Texas and California?

Heh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I prefer to think instead that in such a hypothetical situation Obama could still have worked within different rules to still be in the lead.</i></p>
<p>So Obama wasn&#8217;t <i>trying</i> to win New York, Texas and California?</p>
<p>Heh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pajamas Media &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Pennsylvanians (Finally) Head to the Polls</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/04/21/video-bill-clinton-says-democratic-primary-system-not-fair/#comment-396776</link>
		<dc:creator>Pajamas Media &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Pennsylvanians (Finally) Head to the Polls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5302#comment-396776</guid>
		<description>[...] Bill Clinton Says the Primary System Isn&#8217;t Fair (Donklephant) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bill Clinton Says the Primary System Isn&#8217;t Fair (Donklephant) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Required</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/04/21/video-bill-clinton-says-democratic-primary-system-not-fair/#comment-396757</link>
		<dc:creator>Required</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 02:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5302#comment-396757</guid>
		<description>Rich Horton hypothesizes that "a system that more closely resembled the Electoral College would have Clinton in a commanding lead."

I prefer to think instead that in such a hypothetical situation Obama could still have worked within different rules to still be in the lead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich Horton hypothesizes that &#8220;a system that more closely resembled the Electoral College would have Clinton in a commanding lead.&#8221;</p>
<p>I prefer to think instead that in such a hypothetical situation Obama could still have worked within different rules to still be in the lead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Horton</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/04/21/video-bill-clinton-says-democratic-primary-system-not-fair/#comment-396744</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Horton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5302#comment-396744</guid>
		<description>I'll agree that this isn't a question of "fairness", but Clinton does have a point that the way the Democratic primary is set up will influence the eventual outcome.  He's also right that a system that more closely resembled the Electoral College would have Clinton in a commanding lead.

And when you are in a situation where Denver might roll around without either candidate having enough votes for a first ballot nomination, I'm not sure what arguments count as "delegitimizing" as once you have a SECOND ballot at a convention the popular vote counts for exactly nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll agree that this isn&#8217;t a question of &#8220;fairness&#8221;, but Clinton does have a point that the way the Democratic primary is set up will influence the eventual outcome.  He&#8217;s also right that a system that more closely resembled the Electoral College would have Clinton in a commanding lead.</p>
<p>And when you are in a situation where Denver might roll around without either candidate having enough votes for a first ballot nomination, I&#8217;m not sure what arguments count as &#8220;delegitimizing&#8221; as once you have a SECOND ballot at a convention the popular vote counts for exactly nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.347 seconds -->
