Voter Suppression and the Major Parties
By Marcia Ford | Related entries in IndependentsCall it what you will — vote suppression, vote discouragement, vote manipulation — efforts to keep citizens from voting are nothing new. Despite a host of laws against tampering with elections, you can be sure that someone, somewhere is hard at work devising new schemes to prevent voters from casting their ballots.
This is hardly an issue of interest only to independents. During every election season either major party can come up with ample evidence that the other party is guilty of dirty tricks like vote caging and phone jamming. But vote suppression becomes a specifically independent issue when the two parties collude to discourage the vote by creating laws and regulations that make it difficult for citizens to cast their vote — or have any assurance that their vote was counted once it was cast. That’s not to say that many partisan voters aren’t affected or incensed by these tactics; it is to say that independent activists* have adopted the following issues related to vote discouragement as pet political reform projects:
Voter ID laws. This sounds like a no-brainer; of course we should produce ID at the polls. Some states, though, are trying to require voters who don’t have a license or other official identification — usually the poor, the disabled, and the elderly — to obtain state-issued photo IDs, which can be costly and available only at specific and inconvenient sites, especially in rural areas. NYU’s Brennan Center for Justice offers a wealth of information on this issue.
Voter registration. The lack of uniformity in voter registration deadlines creates unnecessary problems for voters when they move from one state to another; in fact, 84 percent of Americans don’t know their state’s deadline. One solution is same-day voter registration, which is popular among independent activists largely because voter turnout is generally much higher in states that allow it — Maine, Minnesota, New Hampshire, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. (North Dakota doesn’t require registration; Connecticut’s deadline is the day before an election.) I’ve said this before but it bears repeating: in an age when a credit card scanner can decide in roughly 3 seconds whether I can charge a purchase, surely the local election board can figure out in a few minutes if I’m qualified to vote — or provide me with a provisional ballot until they can figure it out.
Faulty voting machines. When electronic machines lose thousands of votes, count each vote multiple times, or break down on Election Day with no repair technician in sight, you have to wonder why state legislatures, with their overwhelmingly partisan memberships, find it so hard to pass laws requiring a paper trail, creating a system for auditing every vote, or allowing citizen access to the computer’s source code. Not only do we have to be concerned about blatant attempts to keep voters from the polls, we also have to be concerned about whether our votes will count once we cast our ballots. Groups pushing for greater ballot accountability include Voters Unite, Verified Voting, and National Voting Rights Institute.
Add to these three issues the myriad other election problems, like inadequate training for poll workers — who have mistakenly turned away voters without photo ID when no such ID is required, opened polling places late or closed them early, or found themselves at a complete loss when voting machines break down — you can see how these issues can discourage people from voting.
These are clearly issues that impact partisans and independents alike. But they are particularly important to politically active independents for this reason: when partisan officials make it harder for people to vote rather than easier, that’s a form of voter suppression. And ending voter suppression in every form is a high-priority independent activist issue.
* Note: I am not attempting to speak for all independent voters and never have claimed to do so. I’m referring to the many independent activists who focus on and work together for political reform. If you’re an independent and this isn’t a pet issue, so be it. Besides, I’m fond of footnotes and needed an excuse to insert one here.
Marcia Ford is the author of We the Purple: Faith, Politics and the Independent Voter.
This entry was posted on Wednesday, April 23rd, 2008 and is filed under Independents. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.








April 23rd, 2008 at 1:58 pm
How easy ought it to be to vote? That’s the question. While it’s worthwhile to encourage folks to vote, and ideally everyone ought to vote as a civic duty, there has to be some balance between that ideal and the equally worthwhile goal of preventing fraud. And I mean both fraud by overt campaign chicanery and fraud by allowing folls to vote who are not entitled to vote, such as illegal undocumented immigrants.[And I'm not anti-immigrant, I just think it's reasonable that only official US citizens be allowed to vote. Allowing them to vote without getting legal status would be another perverse incentive making it easier for undocumented illegals to stay that way.]
So I don’t mind that there are some reasonable thresholds and deadlines. If you don’t take voting seriously and don’t bother to be informed as to the local civic mechanics, it’s fair to say that’s at least in part your own bad.
I think it’s pretty clear why some folks favor same-day registration. Like you said, turnout. But I don’t think the highest possible turnout is necessarily the greatest good. If people who don’t care and aren’t informed don’t get to vote, that’s not exactly the end of the world in my opinion.
Of course, it is INDEED regrettable that some folks who want to be involved and want to register their choice find themselves closed out when circumstances conspire against them. Not saying that’s a GOOD thing per se. And it would be nice to do some things to mitigate this, and to standardize procedures. But in general, I don’t see why it ought to be so easy that folks don’t even have to lift a finger.
Within 4 years, folks will probably be demanding that they be able to vote using their cell phones, and that they have a week or a month to do so. And that the state is negligent if people don’t get repeated reminders. That’s a bit of a joke, but I think it illustrates nicely that there IS something to be said for putting some honus upon citizens themselves.
April 24th, 2008 at 10:34 am
Read Deliberative Democracy.
http://www.amazon.com/Deliberative-Democracy-Essays-Reason-Politics/dp/0262522411
April 24th, 2008 at 10:49 am
I find the post interesting, Marcia.
Most interesting is how you appear to me to be talking in circles.
You note your distrust of electronic voting machines (a agree there should be a paper trail, though). Meanwhile, you are advocating an electronic means of voter registration and/or voter elegibility verification (similar to a credit card swipe). You don’t think there could be problems with the voter verification “card swipe” device??? Electronic devices should be either all good or all bad. Make up your mind…
How would the voters get their electronic voter registration card to swipe? I’d guess they have to register, wouldn’t they?? They would also have to present the vaild card at the poll in order to vote, right??
Sounds kinda’ like requiring a valid form of identification in order to vote….something you seem to think is a bad idea according to your post…again - make up your mind!!
April 24th, 2008 at 12:19 pm
The law requires people to be citizens before they can vote. It was a good idea before I became one and it’s continues to be a great idea.
No type of ID is so costly or so inconvenient to prevent the poor, disabled and elderly to be able to cast their vote.
That’s the disingenous argument of people bent on securing the vote of illegals, felons and dead people.
One sure way to prove people who vote do it so legally is by proof of residence and ID.
Massachusetts requires both. Once a year we get a census form that we have to inspect, correct (if necessary) and send back in. Without it, you are removed from voters’ list.
You bring your ID on voting day. Nothing complicated about it.
April 24th, 2008 at 12:22 pm
Correction: (it’s) it continues to be a great idea.