<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Bad Is It For Hillary?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/05/05/how-bad-is-it-for-hillary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/05/how-bad-is-it-for-hillary/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:03:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kranky kritter</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/05/how-bad-is-it-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-404143</link>
		<dc:creator>kranky kritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 16:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5466#comment-404143</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s about the right ballpark, and the way I&#039;ve been approaching it for some time. If HC and BO roughly split the remaining delegates, then Clinton will need to carry somewhere between 5 out of every 8 and 2 out  of every 3 superdelegates. That&#039;s pretty uphill. 

Carrying 55% is the sort of threshold for reasonability that I&#039;ve based my reasoning on. If you win by 10%, 55-45, you&#039;re getting one person out of 20 to swing away from 50-50, giving 11-9 instead of 10-10. To carry 2/3 of the voters, that means you are getting one person out of THREE to switch away from the 50-50 count.

Now I don&#039;t dismiss the possibility, as these superdelegates are undoubtedly eager to broker the power they&#039;ve been granted, and they are after all politicians. But 2 out of 3 is a very high bar when you&#039;re talking politics and voting.

Obama is running out the clock. If the upcoming results are as expected, and Obama wins the more delegate-rich NC while Hillary carries the less-delegate rich IN, then Obama is all that much closer to running out that clock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s about the right ballpark, and the way I&#8217;ve been approaching it for some time. If HC and BO roughly split the remaining delegates, then Clinton will need to carry somewhere between 5 out of every 8 and 2 out  of every 3 superdelegates. That&#8217;s pretty uphill. </p>
<p>Carrying 55% is the sort of threshold for reasonability that I&#8217;ve based my reasoning on. If you win by 10%, 55-45, you&#8217;re getting one person out of 20 to swing away from 50-50, giving 11-9 instead of 10-10. To carry 2/3 of the voters, that means you are getting one person out of THREE to switch away from the 50-50 count.</p>
<p>Now I don&#8217;t dismiss the possibility, as these superdelegates are undoubtedly eager to broker the power they&#8217;ve been granted, and they are after all politicians. But 2 out of 3 is a very high bar when you&#8217;re talking politics and voting.</p>
<p>Obama is running out the clock. If the upcoming results are as expected, and Obama wins the more delegate-rich NC while Hillary carries the less-delegate rich IN, then Obama is all that much closer to running out that clock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Gardner</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/05/how-bad-is-it-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-404127</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 16:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5466#comment-404127</guid>
		<description>Fixed. Thanks for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fixed. Thanks for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob in Denver</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/05/how-bad-is-it-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-404057</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob in Denver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 15:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5466#comment-404057</guid>
		<description>The link to the NYT delegate widget is malformed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The link to the NYT delegate widget is malformed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

