78% North Carolina: Obama 56%, Clinton 42%

By Justin Gardner | Related entries in 2008 Election, Barack, Democrats, Hillary, Indiana, North Carolina

These numbers from MSNBC:

Obama – 725,161 – 56%
Clinton – 543,476 – 42%

These numbers have been fairly steady for the past hour.

By the way, Zogby predicted it would be a 14% win.

He also thought Obama would win by 2% in Indiana.

We shall see…


This entry was posted on Tuesday, May 6th, 2008 and is filed under 2008 Election, Barack, Democrats, Hillary, Indiana, North Carolina. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

2 Responses to “78% North Carolina: Obama 56%, Clinton 42%”

  1. TheMiddle Says:

    Obama’s near 200K vote win in NC should pretty much end any debate about Hillary winning the popular vote – as always, barring a total meltdown, or the wildly unlikely event of Michigan and Flordia’s votes counting as is.

  2. TheMiddle Says:

    86% in – 39K votes lead. Down 2K from 85% reporting (41K).

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: