Comments on: Clinton “Wins” Indiana http://donklephant.com/2008/05/06/clinton-wins-indiana/ Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable. Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:24:43 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Grant Gould http://donklephant.com/2008/05/06/clinton-wins-indiana/comment-page-1/#comment-406315 Grant Gould Wed, 07 May 2008 14:48:05 +0000 http://donklephant.com/?p=5527#comment-406315 Hm, looks like Obama adds between 17 and 21 delegates in NC, Clinton 1 or 2 in IN, for a net gain of 15 to 20 for Obama for the day. That looks like a fairly sound thumping. Hm, looks like Obama adds between 17 and 21 delegates in NC, Clinton 1 or 2 in IN, for a net gain of 15 to 20 for Obama for the day. That looks like a fairly sound thumping.

]]> By: Avinash_Tyagi http://donklephant.com/2008/05/06/clinton-wins-indiana/comment-page-1/#comment-406313 Avinash_Tyagi Wed, 07 May 2008 14:22:21 +0000 http://donklephant.com/?p=5527#comment-406313 Rich you idiot, if you actually followed the polls you'd see that the pollsters all got the demographics wrong, the demographics in the end were more like Obama's wins than his previous losses. Get your head out of the ground, this was aided, Hill took the morning off to thank all of her GOP pals for saving her last night Rich you idiot, if you actually followed the polls you’d see that the pollsters all got the demographics wrong, the demographics in the end were more like Obama’s wins than his previous losses. Get your head out of the ground, this was aided, Hill took the morning off to thank all of her GOP pals for saving her last night

]]> By: Grant Gould http://donklephant.com/2008/05/06/clinton-wins-indiana/comment-page-1/#comment-406305 Grant Gould Wed, 07 May 2008 13:11:10 +0000 http://donklephant.com/?p=5527#comment-406305 Does anyone have numbers for what this means in terms of pledged delegate numbers? Who "won" or "lost" a state overall is just headline-fodder; it's the delegates that count. Does anyone have numbers for what this means in terms of pledged delegate numbers? Who “won” or “lost” a state overall is just headline-fodder; it’s the delegates that count.

]]> By: Rich http://donklephant.com/2008/05/06/clinton-wins-indiana/comment-page-1/#comment-406304 Rich Wed, 07 May 2008 13:05:04 +0000 http://donklephant.com/?p=5527#comment-406304 Don't give me that crap. Hillary was in the lead in Indiana all along - by much bigger margins than the couple of percentage points she actually won by. The fact that she eeked a win in Indiana when she was forcasted to win by an easy margin shows that "Operation Chaos" had no effect in Indiana. You may be a mindless, kool-aid drinking follower, Avinash, and the way that you burp up of obviously flawed dem talking points readily showns that. Most people aren't, though. Why don't you try coming up with a unique idea. Don’t give me that crap. Hillary was in the lead in Indiana all along – by much bigger margins than the couple of percentage points she actually won by.

The fact that she eeked a win in Indiana when she was forcasted to win by an easy margin shows that “Operation Chaos” had no effect in Indiana.

You may be a mindless, kool-aid drinking follower, Avinash, and the way that you burp up of obviously flawed dem talking points readily showns that. Most people aren’t, though.

Why don’t you try coming up with a unique idea.

]]> By: Avinash_Tyagi http://donklephant.com/2008/05/06/clinton-wins-indiana/comment-page-1/#comment-406192 Avinash_Tyagi Wed, 07 May 2008 06:49:56 +0000 http://donklephant.com/?p=5527#comment-406192 Her margin is small enough that the Limbaugh effect does seem possible Her margin is small enough that the Limbaugh effect does seem possible

]]> By: Justin Gardner http://donklephant.com/2008/05/06/clinton-wins-indiana/comment-page-1/#comment-406167 Justin Gardner Wed, 07 May 2008 06:04:01 +0000 http://donklephant.com/?p=5527#comment-406167 I put it in quotes because there are still a lot of votes left to be counted, and I stated as much. Also, I would have the same thing to say if Obama eeked out a win in North Carolina. It would have seen as a loss, much like Clinton's "win" in Indiana tonight will be seen as. A cheap shot would have been, "Hillary only won because of Limbaugh's scheme," which, by the way, I don't believe. I put it in quotes because there are still a lot of votes left to be counted, and I stated as much. Also, I would have the same thing to say if Obama eeked out a win in North Carolina. It would have seen as a loss, much like Clinton’s “win” in Indiana tonight will be seen as.

A cheap shot would have been, “Hillary only won because of Limbaugh’s scheme,” which, by the way, I don’t believe.

]]> By: TheMiddle http://donklephant.com/2008/05/06/clinton-wins-indiana/comment-page-1/#comment-406143 TheMiddle Wed, 07 May 2008 05:27:45 +0000 http://donklephant.com/?p=5527#comment-406143 Kind of a cheap shot to put that in quotes isn't it? She won and deserves credit for it. Without quotes, or an asterisk. And hey, if Democrats were Republicans (chuckle) she would've won this thing already! Kind of a cheap shot to put that in quotes isn’t it? She won and deserves credit for it. Without quotes, or an asterisk. And hey, if Democrats were Republicans (chuckle) she would’ve won this thing already!

]]>