<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MSNBC Just Changed Indiana To &#8220;Too Close To Call&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/05/06/msnbc-just-changed-indiana-to-too-close-to-call/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/06/msnbc-just-changed-indiana-to-too-close-to-call/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:59:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mw</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/06/msnbc-just-changed-indiana-to-too-close-to-call/comment-page-1/#comment-405965</link>
		<dc:creator>mw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 01:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5508#comment-405965</guid>
		<description>Despite the fact that the leaked Feb 5th Obama campaign strategy memo said that Obama expected to win Indiana by 7 points, despite the fact that Obama called Indiana a tiebreaker two weeks ago, it is clear that:

1) Clinton failed to do what she needed to do tonight.
2) The Clinton campaign badly mismanaged the &quot;expectation&quot; game (including Hillary herself with the &quot;game-changing&quot; comment&quot;)
3) The fact that late breaking votes went to Obama, may mean that Dems are finally ready to end this. 

If you are right, Justin, and he pulls a victory out of Indiana, this is certainly over. But even if it is within a couple of points, the Clinton campaign may have been dealt a mortal blow. The Clinton story unwinds, as the popular vote will be out of reach, even with MI and FL. Obama may have finally &quot;closed the deal&quot; tonight and answered that question also.  There is not enough meat in this outcome tonight to hold the super delegates for Clinton. 

Most shocking of all,  I may have finally called a primary incorrectly. This invokes a frightening specter that I may not be infallible. I am going to have to into seclusion and consider the meaning of this disturbing possibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite the fact that the leaked Feb 5th Obama campaign strategy memo said that Obama expected to win Indiana by 7 points, despite the fact that Obama called Indiana a tiebreaker two weeks ago, it is clear that:</p>
<p>1) Clinton failed to do what she needed to do tonight.<br />
2) The Clinton campaign badly mismanaged the &#8220;expectation&#8221; game (including Hillary herself with the &#8220;game-changing&#8221; comment&#8221;)<br />
3) The fact that late breaking votes went to Obama, may mean that Dems are finally ready to end this. </p>
<p>If you are right, Justin, and he pulls a victory out of Indiana, this is certainly over. But even if it is within a couple of points, the Clinton campaign may have been dealt a mortal blow. The Clinton story unwinds, as the popular vote will be out of reach, even with MI and FL. Obama may have finally &#8220;closed the deal&#8221; tonight and answered that question also.  There is not enough meat in this outcome tonight to hold the super delegates for Clinton. </p>
<p>Most shocking of all,  I may have finally called a primary incorrectly. This invokes a frightening specter that I may not be infallible. I am going to have to into seclusion and consider the meaning of this disturbing possibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
