<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Haven&#8217;t MSNBC And CNN Called Indiana Yet?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/05/06/why-havent-msnbc-and-cnn-called-indiana-yet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/06/why-havent-msnbc-and-cnn-called-indiana-yet/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:03:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bubbles</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/06/why-havent-msnbc-and-cnn-called-indiana-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-405938</link>
		<dc:creator>bubbles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 00:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5505#comment-405938</guid>
		<description>Only a 6 point spread now... interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only a 6 point spread now&#8230; interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim S</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/06/why-havent-msnbc-and-cnn-called-indiana-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-405929</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 00:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5505#comment-405929</guid>
		<description>CBS called Indiana for Clinton and NC for Obama a while ago. Their commentary at that point was completely insipid because it consisted only of how that left everything the same as it was yesterday. In no way did it address what the level of victory in each state might mean to the delegate count. Incredibly shallow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CBS called Indiana for Clinton and NC for Obama a while ago. Their commentary at that point was completely insipid because it consisted only of how that left everything the same as it was yesterday. In no way did it address what the level of victory in each state might mean to the delegate count. Incredibly shallow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

