<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are We Done Yet?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/05/07/are-we-done-yet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/07/are-we-done-yet/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:59:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lynn Espinoza</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/07/are-we-done-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-406324</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynn Espinoza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5528#comment-406324</guid>
		<description>If youâ€™ve spent some time on my blog, you know that I believe that tone is one of the greatest tools of speech communication.  While mine is not a political blog, I find that the political season provides an incredible speech-making laboratory.  So I strapped myself in last night for what I knew would be a good night of speech-making, and a night when tone would necessarily rule.

Pundits had hedged their bets on the outcome of the races in Indiana and North Carolina. If Senator Clinton won both, sheâ€™d come out swinging. If Senator Obama won both, he would wear the mantle of victory and need to be humble and concillatory.  In the end, he almost got what he needed, and she didnâ€™t come close. Niether got what was required to (pardon what has become so cliche) â€œclose the dealâ€.  So the time had come for both to walk the tight-rope of tone.

I was struck by how similar the tones were. Because he didnâ€™t say he won, and she didnâ€™t say she lost, they landed in the middle and - for the first time in months - they sounded like they were on the same team.  As a communications coach, I am always listening for the hidden incendiary words; the veiled threats.  I heard none.  Itâ€™s been a long time since both sounded respectful of the other. Both attempted to inspire, while not over-promise.   In both speeches, the tone was appropriate.  Both candidates used the powerful tool of tone to convey that the party really does have a chance to heal. 

Did you hear it too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If youâ€™ve spent some time on my blog, you know that I believe that tone is one of the greatest tools of speech communication.  While mine is not a political blog, I find that the political season provides an incredible speech-making laboratory.  So I strapped myself in last night for what I knew would be a good night of speech-making, and a night when tone would necessarily rule.</p>
<p>Pundits had hedged their bets on the outcome of the races in Indiana and North Carolina. If Senator Clinton won both, sheâ€™d come out swinging. If Senator Obama won both, he would wear the mantle of victory and need to be humble and concillatory.  In the end, he almost got what he needed, and she didnâ€™t come close. Niether got what was required to (pardon what has become so cliche) â€œclose the dealâ€.  So the time had come for both to walk the tight-rope of tone.</p>
<p>I was struck by how similar the tones were. Because he didnâ€™t say he won, and she didnâ€™t say she lost, they landed in the middle and &#8211; for the first time in months &#8211; they sounded like they were on the same team.  As a communications coach, I am always listening for the hidden incendiary words; the veiled threats.  I heard none.  Itâ€™s been a long time since both sounded respectful of the other. Both attempted to inspire, while not over-promise.   In both speeches, the tone was appropriate.  Both candidates used the powerful tool of tone to convey that the party really does have a chance to heal. </p>
<p>Did you hear it too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donklephant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; All the king&#8217;s horses and all the king&#8217;s men&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/07/are-we-done-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-406316</link>
		<dc:creator>Donklephant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; All the king&#8217;s horses and all the king&#8217;s men&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 14:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5528#comment-406316</guid>
		<description>[...] &#171; Are We Done Yet? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &laquo; Are We Done Yet? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TerenceC</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/07/are-we-done-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-406308</link>
		<dc:creator>TerenceC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 13:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5528#comment-406308</guid>
		<description>Alan

You can look as hard as you want for positive McCain things, but for every positive there is an equally positive negative to exploit, that&#039;s part of the problem with being a fence straddling, life-time government employee,  BS artist. If things stay as they are, McCain is going to be taken apart in the next 6 months - and then beaten within an inch of his political life in November. Remember these words - &quot;Democratic Super Majority&quot;. It&#039;s inevitable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan</p>
<p>You can look as hard as you want for positive McCain things, but for every positive there is an equally positive negative to exploit, that&#8217;s part of the problem with being a fence straddling, life-time government employee,  BS artist. If things stay as they are, McCain is going to be taken apart in the next 6 months &#8211; and then beaten within an inch of his political life in November. Remember these words &#8211; &#8220;Democratic Super Majority&#8221;. It&#8217;s inevitable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
